LAC 33:I.7011

LAC 33:I.7011. New Owner

Last amended: 2026Year: 2026Length: 876 wordsOfficial source

Cite as La. Admin. Code tit. 33, pt. I, § 7011

A. Definitions 1. The following terms used in this Chapter shall have the meanings listed below, unless the context otherwise requires, or unless specifically redefined in a particular Section. Acquisition Closing Date—the date on which ownership of, or a direct or indirect majority interest in the ownership of a regulated facility or operation is acquired in an asset purchase, equity purchase, merger, or similar transaction. New Owner—any person not responsible for the environmental compliance at the time the violation(s) occurred at the facility that is the subject of the environmental audit, did not cause the violation being disclosed, and could not have prevented the occurrence. B. The new owner shall comply with all requirements listed in LAC 33:I.7009 except as listed below. 1. The new owner shall notify the department in writing of the intention to continue an audit that was initiated by the previous owner. 2. An audit shall be completed within six months after the acquisition closing date, if the new owner continues an audit that was initiated by the previous owner. 3. An audit initiated by a new owner shall be completed within a reasonable time, not to exceed nine months from the audit commencement date reported in the Notice of Audit form, unless the department grants an extension of time. 4. Failure to request and receive written approval from the department for an extension of time to complete an audit may forfeit any penalty mitigation. 5. The new owner making the disclosure must certify in the disclosure that all of the following conditions were true before the acquisition closing date of the facility that is the subject of the audit. a. The new owner was not responsible for the environmental compliance at the time the violation(s) occurred at the facility or the operation that is the subject of the audit. b. The new owner did not have the largest ownership share of the seller. c. The seller did not have the largest ownership share of the new owner. d. The new owner and seller did not have a common corporate parent or a common majority interest owner. 6. A new owner is eligible for penalty mitigation if the following are met. a. Prompt disclosure of the violations to the department. b. The conditions outlined in LAC 33:I.7011.B.5. 7. The new owner shall receive a 100 percent reduction in civil penalties for each disclosed violation that meets the following nine conditions. a. The violation was systematically discovered through an environmental audit. b. The violation was voluntarily discovered. The violation was not discovered through a federal, state, or local requirement prescribed by statute, regulation, permit, judicial or administrative order, or a consent agreement. c. The violation was disclosed to the department in writing no later than 30 calendar days after the end of the audit period, unless an existing law or regulation requires disclosure sooner, or as provided in 7009.E.1.d. d. The violation was independently discovered. Discovery of a violation will be presumed to be independent if such discovery occurs prior to, and is disclosed to the department within 72 hours following any of the circumstances below. i. Notice to the owner or operator of an inspection by the department. ii. Notice to the owner or operator of a third party complaint or whistleblower complaint filed with the department and related to the alleged violation. iii. Receipt by the owner or operator of a written information request by the department relating to the subject matter of the violation. e. The violation was corrected as expeditiously as possible, but no later than 90 calendar days from the date of discovery or as allowed under 7009.C.1.b. f. The appropriate measures to prevent a recurrence of the violation were implemented after the violation was disclosed to the department. g. The same or closely related violation has not occurred at the same facility within the past three years. h. The violation is not excluded as listed in LAC 33:I.7007.A. i. The owner or operator has cooperated by providing information as necessary and required by the department to determine eligibility. 8. Penalty mitigation will not apply if any of the following are met. a. The new owner who made the disclosure willingly or knowingly committed the violation or was responsible for the commission of the violation. b. The new owner who made the disclosure recklessly committed the violation or was responsible for the commission of the disclosed violation and the violation resulted in substantial injury or harm to one or more persons, property, or the environment on-site or off-site. c. The violation was committed willfully or knowingly by a member of the new owner’s management, or an agent of the new owner, and the new owner’s policies or lack of prevention systems contributed materially to the occurrence of the violation. d. The violation was recklessly committed by a member of the new owner’s management, by an agent of the new owner, or if the new owner’s policies or lack of prevention systems contributed materially to the occurrence of the violation resulting in substantial injury or harm to one or more persons, property, or the environment on-site or off-site. e. The violation has resulted in substantial economic benefit that gives the new owner a clear advantage over its business competitors.
LAC 33:I.7011: LAC 33:I.7011. New Owner | Justis AI