No. 14 (1972)
Number 14 January 5, 1972
Cite as Mass. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 14, Rep. A.G., Pub. Doc. No. 12 (1972)
Number 14
January 5, 1972
Honorable Joseph J. Higgins
Acting Commissioner of Correction
Leverett Saltonstall Building
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02202
Dear Commissioner Higgins:
You have requested my opinion whether prisoners confined
to the
various correctional institutions of the Commonwealth may be transfer-
red to the "penal facility" established at the Massachusetts Correctional
Institution,
Bridgewater, for the purposes of treatment as drug depen-
dent persons. For the reasons hereinafter stated,
I answer your question
in the negative.
On June 8,
1971,
I rendered an opinion to the Commissioner of Men-
tal Health with respect to commitments to MCI, Bridgewater under the
provisions of Chapter 123 of the General Laws. A copy of that opinion
is enclosed.
I
refer you to that opinion for a general discussion of the
P.D.
12
75
statutory provisions involved, and
I incorporate herein so much of that
opinion as
is pertinent to the resolution of your question. As
I noted in
that opinion, the recent amendment to G. L.
c.
125,
§
19 made by
St.
1970,
c.
888,
§ 6
restricts commitments
to Bridgewater to males con-
victed of drunkenness and persons committed pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 123.
You have advised me that you contemplate transferring prisoners who
have not taken advantage of the commitment and treatment provisions
of Chapter 123. That being the case, the remaining question for resolu-
tion, in view of my prior opinion, is whether the Commissioner's powers
relating to transfer of prisoners found in G. L. c.
127, § 97 supersede the
restrictions found in G. L.
c.
125,
§ 19 and the procedures for commit-
ment set out in Chapter 123.
It
is my opinion that they do not.
General Laws, Chapter 127, section 97 provides:
"The commissioner may transfer any sentenced prisoner
from one
correctional
institution of the commonwealth
to
another, and with the approval of the
sheriff of the county
from any such institution except a prisoner serving a life sen-
tence to any jail or house of correction, or a sentenced pris-
oner from any jail or house of correction to any such institu-
tion except the state prison, or from any jail or house of cor-
rection to any other jail or house of correction. Prisoners so
removed
shall be subject to the terms of their original sen-
tences and to the provisions of law governing parole from the
correctional institutions of the commonwealth."
Prior to 1958, the section restricted the transfer of prisoners sentenced
to the
state prison to the correctional institutions
at Walpole, Norfolk
and Concord. By St.
1958, c. 634, the section was amended to provide,
as the title of the chapter stated, that such prisoners could also be trans-
ferred to MCI, Bridgewater. The first sentence of section 97 was further
revised, to read as
it presently does, by St.
1968, c. 627.
In 1967, the then Commissioner of Correction requested an opinion of
my predecessor whether he might transfer prisoners from one correc-
tional institution to the "state hospital"
section of MCI, Bridgewater.
The answer was
in the negative because of the conclusion
"that the
Legislature intended the Superior Court warrant procedure
to control
the transfer of prisoners to the Hospital
.
.
." 1968 Op. Atty. Gen'l 47,
48.
In the instant situation, similar considerations govern. The Legislature
has provided the machinery for commitments to the drug treatment facil-
ity at MCI, Bridgewater in G. L. c.
123, § 48. Treatment is on a consen-
sual basis, and, in the amendment made to G. L. c.
125, §
19, the Legis-
lature has also provided that no prisoner may be committed to MCI,
Bridgewater except males convicted of drunkenness and persons com-
mitted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
123.
In my opinion, the
Legislature has evidenced an intent that treatment at Bridgewater will be
76
P.D.
12
confined
to those persons who
voluntarily request commitment and
treatment under the provisions of section 48. That intent cannot be cir-
cumvented by utilizing the transfer powers found in G. L.
c.
127, § 97.
In conclusion, then,
it
is my opinion that prisoners may not be trans-
ferred to the drug treatment
facility
at MCI,
Bridgewater from other
correctional institutions unless they have invoked the provisions of G.
L.
c.
123,
§ 48.
Very truly yours,
ROBERT H. QUINN
Attorney General