No. 16 (1973)
Number 16 January 9, 1973
Cite as Mass. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 16, Rep. A.G., Pub. Doc. No. 12 (1973)
Number 16
January 9, 1973
Honorable John F. Kehoe, Jr.
Commissioner of Public Safety
1010 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Dear Commissioner Kehoe:
You have requested my opinion whether a Detective Lieutenant In-
spector, while assigned to the Division of Fire Prevention,
is entitled to
the benefits of G.
L.
c. 41,
§
108L, as inserted by Chapter 835 of the
Acts of 1970. Since
it
is not clear whether your question refers to tem-
porary or permanent assignments,
I must answer your question
in two
parts.
First,
it
is my opinion
that a Detective Lieutenant
Inspector, while
permanently assigned to the Division of Fire Prevention,
is not entitled
to the benefits of G.
L.
c. 41,
§ 108L for the reasons hereinafter stated.
General Laws,
c. 41, § 108L, the police career incentive pay act, pro-
vides, in pertinent part:
"There
is hereby established
a career incentive pay
pro-
gram offering base salary increases to regular full-time mem-
bers of the
.
.
. division of state police
in the department of
public safety ... as a reward for furthering their education in
the field of police work."
Statutes must be construed
as
they
are enacted and each word or
phrase
is presumed to have
its ordinary meaning. Davey Bros.
Inc.
v.
Stop & Shop,
Inc., 351 Mass.
59, 63. There can be no doubt that the
Legislature intended that the police career incentive program apply only
P.D.
12
71
to policemen. There
is also no ambiguity
in regard to employees of the
Department of Public Safety. General Laws,
c. 41.
§ 108L specifically
and exclusively refers to "regular full-time members of
.
.
. the division
of state police in the department of public safety."' The statute does not
refer to any members of the Department of Public Safety who are not
assigned to the Division of State Police on a regular full-time basis. Ac-
cordingly, regular full-time employees of any other division of the De-
partment of Public Safety, including the Division of Fire Prevention, are
not eligible for benefits under c. 41,
§ 108L.
You have informed me that Detective Lieutenant Inspectors assigned
to
the
Division of Fire Prevention are charged with enforcing
all
the
laws of the Commonwealth and regulations of the Department of Public
Safety, but concentrate on fire prevention and investigating arson.
It
is
clear that the Division of State Police does not share the same primary
and inclusive responsibility for arson cases but must be concerned in the
first instance with the total crime spectrum, including fire prevention.
It
follows
that personnel assigned to the
Division of Fire Prevention do
not have the same duties and responsibilities as members of the Division
of State
Police
but have
limited
duties.
However,
you have
also
in-
formed me that perhaps 75%-85% of the State Police Detective Lieuten-
ant Inspectors are transferred to the Division of Fire Prevention at some
point
in their career and cannot refuse such an assignment.
It may appear harsh that the Legislature distinguished between Detec-
tive Lieutenant Inspectors assigned to the Division of State Police and
Detective Lieutenant
Inspectors assigned to the Division of Fire Pre-
vention
in enacting G.
L.
c. 41.
§ 108L. One arguably anomalous result
follows when a Detective Lieutenant Inspector
is barred from continu-
ing the police career incentive program by an assignment from the Divi-
sion of State Police to the Division of Fire Prevention. However, a stat-
ute cannot be interpreted to avoid hardship
if the statutory language
is
clear and unambiguous. "To stretch the meaning of a statute so as to
adjust an alleged injustice, inequity or hardship could cause a multipli-
city
of interpretations
as each
alleged
injustice,
inequity
or
hardship
arose." Town of Milton
v.
Metropolitan
District Commission.
342
Mass. 222, 227. Only the Legislature can modify the law.
Secondly,
it
is my opinion that a Detective Lieutenant Inspector per-
manently attached
to the
Division of State
Police, who
is temporarily
assigned to the Division of Fire Prevention,
is entitled to the benefits of
G.
L.
c. 41,
§ I08L.
You have informed me that State Detective Lieutenant Inspectors as-
signed to the Division of State Police are occasionally temporarily trans-
ferred
to the
Division of Fire Prevention. You have also stated that a
Detective Lieutenant
Inspector remains on the payroll, and thus under
the administrative control, of the Division of State Police. Under those
circumstances,
it
is my opinion that the Detective Lieutenant Inspector
72
P.D.
12
has not lost his status as a regular full-time employee of the Division of
State Police and
is entitled to the benefits of G.
L.
c. 41,
§ 108L.
Very truly yours,
ROBERT H. QUINN
Attorney General