No. 12 (1976)
Number 12 July 22, 1975
Cite as Mass. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 12, Rep. A.G., Pub. Doc. No. 12 (1976)
Number 12
July 22, 1975
Mrs. Evvajean Mintz, Director
Division of Registration
Leverett Saltonstall Building
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02202
Dear Mrs. Mintz:
Your predecessor requested my opinion as to whether Chapter 582, Sec-
tion 3 of the Acts of 1962, which amended G. L. c. 141, §§
1 and 8, permits a
licensed journeyman electrician, who
is also a licensed instructor of the
Department of Education, to supervise electrical work performed by stu-
dents in public or nonprofit institutions if such work is performed without
financial remuneration. My opinion is that the statute permits such activity.
The students involved are enrolled at local vocational high schools and, as
part of their curriculum, do on-the-job training without pay, for example, at
the local town hall or Y.M.C.A. The journeyman electrician acts as an
instructor and supervisor of the students while on the job.
Section 3 of Chapter 582 provides as follows:
"The provisions of sections one and eight of chapter one hundred
and forty-one of the General Laws, as amended by sections one
and two, respectively, of this act, in so far as they restrict the
working by learners or apprentices with and under the direct
personal supervision of journeymen electricians shall not apply
to employees while they are engaged in an on-the-job training
program, so called, conducted in cooperation with an accredited
university, college or secondary school
.
.
.
."
The provisions of the General Laws referred to in the quoted passage limit
the number of apprentices who may work for a master electrician and a
journeyman electrician. See
13 Op. Atty. Gen. 70 (1963); 4 Op. Atty. Gen.
496 (1915). However, Chapter 582 of the Actsof 1962 created an exception to
such limitations by permitting the employment of any number of appren-
tices if they are supervised by a journeyman electrician and are engaged in
the on-the-job training program of an accredited .school. It is my opinion that
the exception applies to this situation.
Since the instructor
is licensed by the Department of Education and the
program
is presumably operated in conjunction with an accredited state
vocational high school, the only possible objection to the operation of this
84
P.D. 12
type of program would be the contention that the students are not
"employees," under Chapter 582. Since Chapter 141 itself does not require
licensure for work done without remuneration, Op. Atty. Gen., Sept. 5, 1973,
G. L. c.
141, §
1,
it would be pardoxical to require that persons covered by
Chapter 582 be employees. Therefore,
it
is my opinion that the term
"employees" does not restrict the operation of Chapter 582, as long as the
other requirements of the chapter are met.
Very truly yours,
FRANCIS X. BELLOTTI
Attorney General