81OAG020
81OAG020
Cite as 81 Md. Op. Att'y Gen. 20
20
1 Maryland Rule 4-102 (h) defines “petty offense” as “an offense for
which the penalty may not exceed imprisonment for a period of three
months or a fine of five hundred dollars.”
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ) DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL MAY
NOT SIGN CITATION
September 19, 1996
The Honorable Scott L. Rolle
State’s Attorney for Frederick County
You have requested our opinion concerning the authority of
deputy fire marshals to initiate criminal charges for petty offenses
that come under their jurisdiction. Specifically, you have asked
whether a deputy fire marshal would be considered a “peace officer”
and, therefore, authorized to sign a citation to initiate criminal
charges.
Our opinion is that a deputy fire marshal is not a “peace
officer” and, therefore, is not authorized to sign a citation to initiate
criminal charges.
I
Procedure for Initiating Charges
Under current procedures, a deputy fire marshal must go to a
District Court Commissioner’s office and fill out an Application for
Statement of Charges for each petty offense that comes under his or
her jurisdiction.1 This requirement is itself time-consuming, and, as
you observe in your letter, after the statement of charges is filed the
deputy fire marshal must “relocate the offender to arrest or serve
21
2 Ordinarily, the filing of a statement of charges would result in a
summons to the defendant. Rule 4-212(b). Under the circumstances
listed in Rule 4-212(d)(1), an arrest warrant would be issued. A warrant
would be executed when a “peace officer” arrested the defendant. Rule
4-102(l).
them.”2 You ask whether a deputy fire marshal may instead initiate
charges by issuing a citation.
In Maryland, an offense may be tried only on a “charging
document.” Rule 4-201(a). A “charging document” is “a written
accusation alleging that a defendant has committed an offense. It
includes a citation, an indictment, an information, and a statement of
charges.” Rule 4-102 (a). A “citation” is “a charging document,
other than an indictment, information, or statement of charges,
issued to a defendant by a peace officer or other person authorized
by law to do so.” Rule 4-202(b). A citation “shall be signed by a
person authorized by law to do so before it is issued.”
No provision of law authorizes a deputy fire marshal to issue
a citation. Therefore, a deputy fire marshal may issue a citation only
if the deputy fire marshal is a “peace officer.”
II
Authority of State Fire Marshal
The office of the State Fire Marshal is a part of the Department
of Public Safety and Correctional Services. Article 38A, §7(a)(1).
The State Fire Marshall’s “full time investigative and inspection
assistants” are deputy State fire marshals. Article 38A, §7(d). In our
opinion, a deputy fire marshal possesses the same authority as the
State Fire Marshal. See Rucker v. Harford County, 316 Md. 275,
281, 558 A.2d 399 (1989) (deputy sheriff functions as the alter ego
of the sheriff and exercises the same authority); 58 Opinions of the
Attorney General 708, 710 (1973) (deputy sheriff deemed capable
of acting for and on behalf of sheriff in every official capacity).
Accordingly, we shall use the term “fire marshal” to refer to both the
State Fire Marshal and deputy State fire marshals.
The duties of a fire marshal are to “enforce all laws of the
State” having to do with the following: the prevention of fire; the
22
storage, sale, and use of any explosive, combustible, or other
dangerous article; installation and maintenance of fire-related
equipment; the “means and adequacy of exit, in case of fire,” from
buildings; and the “suppression of arson.” Article 38A, §8(a). A
fire marshal also has the authority to “investigate as to the origin or
circumstances or attempt to cause fire or explosion occurring in the
State.” Article 38A, §8(f). In pursuit of an investigation, a fire
marshal may enter a burned building or an adjacent building and
“may in the exercise of [the fire marshal’s] discretion, take full
control and custody of the said buildings ....” Id. “If, upon
investigation the State Fire Marshall has probable cause to believe
that a person has committed or has attempted to commit a crime
involving a fire, fire bombing, or false alarm, or involving the
possession or manufacture of explosive devices or substances,
fireworks, or fire bombs, the State Fire Marshall may arrest that
person or cause him to be arrested and charged with the crime, in
accordance with the appropriate procedures provided by law.”
Article 38A, §8(g)(2).
III
Fire Marshal as Peace Officer
In considering whether a special policeman was a “peace
officer” and therefore authorized by court rule to sign a charging
document, the Court of Appeals noted that the pertinent rule, then as
now, did not define the term “peace officer.” Huger v. State, 285
Md. 347, 352, 402 A.2d 880 (1979). The Court then accepted the
argument that the term was to be given its “commonly understood
meaning ... [as] a person charged with the duty ‘to enforce and
preserve the public peace.’” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary
(4th ed. 1968)). “Public peace,” the Court continued, is defined as
“[t]he peace or tranquility of the community in general; the good
order and repose of the people ....” Id. (internal quotation marks
omitted).
In 63 Opinions of the Attorney General 502 (1978), this office
was asked whether Parole and Probation Agents were “peace
officers.” Concluding that these agents were not “peace officers,”
Attorney General Burch noted the agents’ limited law enforcement
authority:
23
The only law enforcement authority of
members of the Division of Parole and
Probation ... allows any Parole Agent ... to
execute warrants for the retaking of parole
violators. The limited authority to retake
parole violators upon warrants does not
constitute employees of the Division of Parole
and Probation as peace or law enforcement
officers. Members of the Division of Parole
and Probation have no statutory authority to
enforce and preserve the public peace, detect
and prevent the commission of a crime or to
enforce the criminal laws and ordinances of
this State, nor to apprehend and arrest
criminals. Members of the Division of Parole
and Probation are therefore not peace officers.
63 Opinions of the Attorney General at 504.
Although fire marshals have the authority to enforce the law,
detect and prevent the commission of certain crime, and apprehend
and arrest criminals, this authority is limited to one specific area:
offenses related to fire and explosives. A fire marshal does not have
broad enforcement powers concerning criminal laws generally. For
this reason, Attorney General Burch concluded that county fire
marshals, deputy fire marshals, and fire investigators were not part
of a “law enforcement” unit for purposes of the Police Training
Commission statute. 61 Opinions of the Attorney General 668, 683
(1976).
The limited scope of a fire marshal’s enforcement powers
contrasts markedly with the powers of those who have been held to
be “peace officers.” Concluding that a special policeman is a “peace
officer,” the Court of Appeals observed: “‘[A special policeman’s]
jurisdiction ... [is] quite broad, and [is] not limited only to those
offenses of some particular interest ....’” Huger, 285 Md. at 351
(quoting Gray v. State, 38 Md. App. 343, 349, 380 A.2d 1071, cert.
denied, 282 Md. 732 (1978)). See also Leach v. Penn-Mar
Merchants Ass’n, Inc., 18 Md. App. 603, 610-11, 308 A.2d 446,
24
3 An Illinois statute suggests that a statutory delineation is needed
if the term “peace officer” is to be expanded beyond its common law
scope. See Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 21-13 ( a “peace officer” is “any person who
by virtue of his office or public employment is vested by law with a duty
to maintain public order or to make arrests for offenses whether that duty
extends to all offenses or is limited to specific offenses”) (emphasis
added).
4 This office has previously advised that a deputy State fire marshal
“is trained as a police officer and is delegated the police and investigative
powers of the State Fire Marshal. These powers appear to be the exercise
of State sovereignty ...” and therefore render a fire marshal a “public
officer” for purposes of dual office-holding. Letter from Assistant
Attorney General Robert A. Zarnoch, Counsel to the General Assembly,
to Delegate James M. Harkins (May 30, 1995), at 2 n.1. “Public officer”
status, however, can be found based on the potential exercise of sovereign
powers of various kinds, including the issuance of compulsory process.
See Article 38A, §8(h). “Peace officer” status, by contrast, depends on the
generalized exercise of law enforcement authority.
cert. denied, 269 Md. 761 (1973) (private security guard not a
“peace officer” where duties were limited).3
Vandiver v. Endicott, 109 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. 1959), is illustrative.
The case involved a fire marshal’s entitlement to certain benefits
available to “peace officers.” The fire marshal’s primary duties
included fire prevention and safety and enforcing related laws and
ordinances. 109 S.E.2d at 776. The court noted that it was the
intent of the legislature in enacting the pertinent statute to exclude
from the definition of “peace officer” those public employees or
officers who, incidental to the primary duties of their employment,
occasionally perform some of the services of a police officer. 109
S.E.2d at 777. The court went on to hold: “The fact that, under the
ordinance ..., officers of the fire department are invested with the
powers of police officers and are authorized to make arrests within
the city would not constitute them “peace officers....” Id. See also
Service Employees Intern. Union v. City of Redwood City, 38 Cal.
Rptr. 2d 86, 92 (Cal. App. 1995) (the legislature did not equate
enforcing fire laws with acting in the capacity of “peace officer”).
But see People v. Jackson, 339 N.Y.S.2d 429, 434-35 (N.Y. Crim.
Ct. 1972) (fire marshal is considered a “police officer,” and therefore
a “peace officer”) (dictum).4
25
IV
Conclusion
In summary, it is our opinion that a deputy fire marshal is not
considered a “peace officer” and, therefore, is not authorized to sign
a citation to initiate criminal charges.
J. Joseph Curran, Jr.
Attorney General
Kimberly Smith Ward
Assistant Attorney General
Jack Schwartz
Chief Counsel
Opinions and Advice
20
1 Maryland Rule 4-102 (h) defines “petty offense” as “an offense for
which the penalty may not exceed imprisonment for a period of three
months or a fine of five hundred dollars.”
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ) DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL MAY
NOT SIGN CITATION
September 19, 1996
The Honorable Scott L. Rolle
State’s Attorney for Frederick County
You have requested our opinion concerning the authority of
deputy fire marshals to initiate criminal charges for petty offenses
that come under their jurisdiction. Specifically, you have asked
whether a deputy fire marshal would be considered a “peace officer”
and, therefore, authorized to sign a citation to initiate criminal
charges.
Our opinion is that a deputy fire marshal is not a “peace
officer” and, therefore, is not authorized to sign a citation to initiate
criminal charges.
I
Procedure for Initiating Charges
Under current procedures, a deputy fire marshal must go to a
District Court Commissioner’s office and fill out an Application for
Statement of Charges for each petty offense that comes under his or
her jurisdiction.1 This requirement is itself time-consuming, and, as
you observe in your letter, after the statement of charges is filed the
deputy fire marshal must “relocate the offender to arrest or serve
21
2 Ordinarily, the filing of a statement of charges would result in a
summons to the defendant. Rule 4-212(b). Under the circumstances
listed in Rule 4-212(d)(1), an arrest warrant would be issued. A warrant
would be executed when a “peace officer” arrested the defendant. Rule
4-102(l).
them.”2 You ask whether a deputy fire marshal may instead initiate
charges by issuing a citation.
In Maryland, an offense may be tried only on a “charging
document.” Rule 4-201(a). A “charging document” is “a written
accusation alleging that a defendant has committed an offense. It
includes a citation, an indictment, an information, and a statement of
charges.” Rule 4-102 (a). A “citation” is “a charging document,
other than an indictment, information, or statement of charges,
issued to a defendant by a peace officer or other person authorized
by law to do so.” Rule 4-202(b). A citation “shall be signed by a
person authorized by law to do so before it is issued.”
No provision of law authorizes a deputy fire marshal to issue
a citation. Therefore, a deputy fire marshal may issue a citation only
if the deputy fire marshal is a “peace officer.”
II
Authority of State Fire Marshal
The office of the State Fire Marshal is a part of the Department
of Public Safety and Correctional Services. Article 38A, §7(a)(1).
The State Fire Marshall’s “full time investigative and inspection
assistants” are deputy State fire marshals. Article 38A, §7(d). In our
opinion, a deputy fire marshal possesses the same authority as the
State Fire Marshal. See Rucker v. Harford County, 316 Md. 275,
281, 558 A.2d 399 (1989) (deputy sheriff functions as the alter ego
of the sheriff and exercises the same authority); 58 Opinions of the
Attorney General 708, 710 (1973) (deputy sheriff deemed capable
of acting for and on behalf of sheriff in every official capacity).
Accordingly, we shall use the term “fire marshal” to refer to both the
State Fire Marshal and deputy State fire marshals.
22
The duties of a fire marshal are to “enforce all laws of the
State” having to do with the following: the prevention of fire; the
storage, sale, and use of any explosive, combustible, or other
dangerous article; installation and maintenance of fire-related
equipment; the “means and adequacy of exit, in case of fire,” from
buildings; and the “suppression of arson.” Article 38A, §8(a). A
fire marshal also has the authority to “investigate as to the origin or
circumstances or attempt to cause fire or explosion occurring in the
State.” Article 38A, §8(f). In pursuit of an investigation, a fire
marshal may enter a burned building or an adjacent building and
“may in the exercise of [the fire marshal’s] discretion, take full
control and custody of the said buildings ....” Id. “If, upon
investigation the State Fire Marshall has probable cause to believe
that a person has committed or has attempted to commit a crime
involving a fire, fire bombing, or false alarm, or involving the
possession or manufacture of explosive devices or substances,
fireworks, or fire bombs, the State Fire Marshall may arrest that
person or cause him to be arrested and charged with the crime, in
accordance with the appropriate procedures provided by law.”
Article 38A, §8(g)(2).
III
Fire Marshal as Peace Officer
In considering whether a special policeman was a “peace
officer” and therefore authorized by court rule to sign a charging
document, the Court of Appeals noted that the pertinent rule, then as
now, did not define the term “peace officer.” Huger v. State, 285
Md. 347, 352, 402 A.2d 880 (1979). The Court then accepted the
argument that the term was to be given its “commonly understood
meaning ... [as] a person charged with the duty ‘to enforce and
preserve the public peace.’” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary
(4th ed. 1968)). “Public peace,” the Court continued, is defined as
“[t]he peace or tranquility of the community in general; the good
order and repose of the people ....” Id. (internal quotation marks
omitted).
In 63 Opinions of the Attorney General 502 (1978), this office
was asked whether Parole and Probation Agents were “peace
officers.” Concluding that these agents were not “peace officers,”
23
Attorney General Burch noted the agents’ limited law enforcement
authority:
The only law enforcement authority of
members of the Division of Parole and
Probation ... allows any Parole Agent ... to
execute warrants for the retaking of parole
violators. The limited authority to retake
parole violators upon warrants does not
constitute employees of the Division of Parole
and Probation as peace or law enforcement
officers. Members of the Division of Parole
and Probation have no statutory authority to
enforce and preserve the public peace, detect
and prevent the commission of a crime or to
enforce the criminal laws and ordinances of
this State, nor to apprehend and arrest
criminals. Members of the Division of Parole
and Probation are therefore not peace officers.
63 Opinions of the Attorney General at 504.
Although fire marshals have the authority to enforce the law,
detect and prevent the commission of certain crime, and apprehend
and arrest criminals, this authority is limited to one specific area:
offenses related to fire and explosives. A fire marshal does not have
broad enforcement powers concerning criminal laws generally. For
this reason, Attorney General Burch concluded that county fire
marshals, deputy fire marshals, and fire investigators were not part
of a “law enforcement” unit for purposes of the Police Training
Commission statute. 61 Opinions of the Attorney General 668, 683
(1976).
The limited scope of a fire marshal’s enforcement powers
contrasts markedly with the powers of those who have been held to
be “peace officers.” Concluding that a special policeman is a “peace
officer,” the Court of Appeals observed: “‘[A special policeman’s]
jurisdiction ... [is] quite broad, and [is] not limited only to those
offenses of some particular interest ....’” Huger, 285 Md. at 351
(quoting Gray v. State, 38 Md. App. 343, 349, 380 A.2d 1071, cert.
denied, 282 Md. 732 (1978)). See also Leach v. Penn-Mar
Merchants Ass’n, Inc., 18 Md. App. 603, 610-11, 308 A.2d 446,
24
3 An Illinois statute suggests that a statutory delineation is needed
if the term “peace officer” is to be expanded beyond its common law
scope. See Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 21-13 ( a “peace officer” is “any person who
by virtue of his office or public employment is vested by law with a duty
to maintain public order or to make arrests for offenses whether that duty
extends to all offenses or is limited to specific offenses”) (emphasis
added).
4 This office has previously advised that a deputy State fire marshal
“is trained as a police officer and is delegated the police and investigative
powers of the State Fire Marshal. These powers appear to be the exercise
of State sovereignty ...” and therefore render a fire marshal a “public
officer” for purposes of dual office-holding. Letter from Assistant
Attorney General Robert A. Zarnoch, Counsel to the General Assembly,
to Delegate James M. Harkins (May 30, 1995), at 2 n.1. “Public officer”
status, however, can be found based on the potential exercise of sovereign
powers of various kinds, including the issuance of compulsory process.
See Article 38A, §8(h). “Peace officer” status, by contrast, depends on the
generalized exercise of law enforcement authority.
cert. denied, 269 Md. 761 (1973) (private security guard not a
“peace officer” where duties were limited).3
Vandiver v. Endicott, 109 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. 1959), is illustrative.
The case involved a fire marshal’s entitlement to certain benefits
available to “peace officers.” The fire marshal’s primary duties
included fire prevention and safety and enforcing related laws and
ordinances. 109 S.E.2d at 776. The court noted that it was the
intent of the legislature in enacting the pertinent statute to exclude
from the definition of “peace officer” those public employees or
officers who, incidental to the primary duties of their employment,
occasionally perform some of the services of a police officer. 109
S.E.2d at 777. The court went on to hold: “The fact that, under the
ordinance ..., officers of the fire department are invested with the
powers of police officers and are authorized to make arrests within
the city would not constitute them “peace officers....” Id. See also
Service Employees Intern. Union v. City of Redwood City, 38 Cal.
Rptr. 2d 86, 92 (Cal. App. 1995) (the legislature did not equate
enforcing fire laws with acting in the capacity of “peace officer”).
But see People v. Jackson, 339 N.Y.S.2d 429, 434-35 (N.Y. Crim.
Ct. 1972) (fire marshal is considered a “police officer,” and therefore
a “peace officer”) (dictum).4
25
IV
Conclusion
In summary, it is our opinion that a deputy fire marshal is not
considered a “peace officer” and, therefore, is not authorized to sign
a citation to initiate criminal charges.
J. Joseph Curran, Jr.
Attorney General
Kimberly Smith Ward
Assistant Attorney General
Jack Schwartz
Chief Counsel
Opinions and Advice