79-161
Datatron request
Cite as Me. Op. Att'y Gen. 79-161
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE
The following document is provided by the
LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY
at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library
http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib
Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied
(searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions)
ST A TE OF MAINE
lntcr--Dcpartmental Memorandum
Date
AuguSt
~-9...! __ ~_2__79 _-
To _ ___:R:...:.o~d=n;;...;ec...y.___s..c.._,Q,._u_1_·_n_n ________ _
Dept.
Secretary of State
From
Steven F. Wright, Assistant
Dept.
Attorney General
Subject Datatron request
In response to your letter of August 9, 1979, I have reviewed
the Freedom of Access Law and would offer the following observations
with regard to your specific inquiries.
The Freedom of Access Law, 1 MRSA §401, et seq., expressly
proscribes any denial of public accessability to the records of
the Secretary of State, except those clothed with confidentiality
by statute.
1 MRSA §§402(3), 408.
None of the records requested
by Datatron in their letter of July 2, 1979, are confidential.
Therefore, their request for access to these records cannot be
refused.
It should be noted that access to and inspection of the files
of licensed drivers are not what Datatron has requested.
Datatron
seeks an actual. copy of the computer tape containing an electronic
data compilation of the names and addresses of all Maine licensees.
Section 408 provides, in pertinent part that
whenever inspection cannot be accomplished
without translation of mechanical or
electronic data compilations into some other
form, the person desiring inspection may be
required to pay the State in advance the
cost of translation.
and provided further
that the cost of copying any public record to
comply with this section shall be paid by the
person requesting the copy.
It appears clear that the Secretary of State may assess Datatron
the "c~st of translation" and the "cost of copying" the records it
· seeks._/
The statute does not further define "cost".
Neither does
it offer guidance as to what criteria should be taken into consideration
by an agency in ascertaining its cost for developing a copy of a
requested public record.
A reasonable assessment of the costs attri-
butable to translation or copying the data or information requested
by Datatron should be undertaken, and the fee charged for that in-
formation should be reflective of that assessment.
As you have stated
in your letter, past charges for similar information requests would
be relevant to any such assessment, if such charges were based on an
analysis of the costs of developing and copying the information.
29 MRSA §57-A, as last amended by P.L.1979, c. 439 §6, provides
that copies of driver record history reports and conviction data
may be furnished commercial users for a fee of $3.00 for each
request.
This statute is established for the purpose of gener-
ating revenue (See, statement of Fact, H-706, House Amendment "A"
to S.P. 586, L.D. 1651, one legislative form of P.L.1979, c. 439)
primarily from insurance companies when they seek to verify
information on policy applications.
We believe this statute
(Cont. )
-2-
The determination of departmental costs of develdping copies of
public records may be an area ripe for rules and regulations.
The
Maine Administrative Procedure Act of 5 MRSA §8051, et seq.,
anticipates the promulgation of generally applicable agency policies.
The promulgation of rules governing the determination of agency
costs in developing translations or copies of public records would
also assure those requesting the information fair and impartial cost
assessments.
Adoption of such rules would provide for public input
into the department's criteria for assessing costs.
Your expressed intention of having the entire department under-
take a comprehensive review of the subject area to establish a
detailed, broad policy appears valuable.
I would be pleased to meet
with any of your deputies to discuss in more detail their legal
obligations and to consider alternatives in establishing this policy.
If you have further questions on this topic, please contact me.
SFW: jg
(Continued)
xis
=, 1--C) ~\---
STEVEN F •. WRIGHT
}
Assistant Attorney General
is inapposite to the instant request as it appears to pertain to
the purchase of conviction data with regard to specified individuals.
The instant request seeks only a list of names and addresses of all
Maine licensees.