04-4
Power of the Commissioner of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife to end coyote snaring
Cite as Me. Op. Att'y Gen. 04-4
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE
The following document is provided by the
LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY
at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library
http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib
Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied
(searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions)
04-4
REGIONAL OFFICES:
r',.. STEVEN ROWE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
84 HARLOW ST., 2ND FLOOR
BANGOR, MAINE 0440 i
TEL: (207) 941-3070
Telephone: (207} 826-8800
ID□: (207) 626-8865
STATE OF MAINE
OFFICE OF THE A TIORNEY GENERAL
6 STATE HOUSE STATION
AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0006
July 6, 2004
Representative Linda Rogers McKee
Walton Road
RR 1 Box 280
Wayne, Maine 04284
Dear Representative McKee:
FAX: (207) 941-3075
44 OAK STREET, 4TH FLOOR
PORTLAND, MAtNE 0410 I -30 14
TEL: (207) 822-0260
FAX: (207) 822-0259
TDD: (877) 428-8800
128 SWEDEN ST., STE. 2
CARIBOU, MAINE 04736
TEL: (207)496-3792
FAX'. (207) 496-3291
This is in response to your letter of June 29, 2004, wherein you requested that I clarify
my opinion letter of June 21, 2004 regarding the State's coyote control law. Specifically, you
asked that I clarify the final sentence in my June 29 letter, in which I stated "[W]e believe that
the law does not legally compel the Department [ of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife] to carry out a
particular coyote snaring program." You asked that I more directly address your original
question: "Does the Commissioner of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife have the power to end coyote
snaring if he sees fit, or is he mandated by the Legislature to carry out the program by the
Legislature?"
It certainly was not my intent to create any ambiguity inmy June 21 opinion. The
relevant statutes, Title 12 M.R.S.A. §§10001, 10051, 10053(8) and 10105(3), confer upon the
Commissioner discretionary authority to maintain coyote control programs. They do not,
however, require that the Commissioner maintain a particular coyote snaring program, or, for
that matter, any coyote snaring program at all. As I explained in my earlier letter, while
§ 10105(3) states that "the commissioner shall maintain a coyote control program as follows,"
what then follows is that the "commissioner may employ qualified persons to serve as agents of
the department for purposes of coyote control." The statute further grants to the commissioner
discretion regarding the determination of "where predation by coyotes is posing a threat to deer
or other wildlife_" §10105(3)(A).
As head of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, the Commissioner has the
responsibility "to preserve, protect and enhance the inland fisheries and wildlife resources of the
State; to encourage the wise use of these resources; to ensure coordinated planning for the future
use and preservation of these resources; and to provide for effective management of these
resources." 12 M.R.S.A. §10051. Wildlife management includes predator control. 12 M.R.S.A.
§ 10001 (73).
Primed on Recycled Paper
Representative Linda Rogers McKee
July 7, 2004
Page 2
The Legislature has given the Commissioner, as part of his responsibility to manage and protect
wildlife resources, the authority to initiate and maintain wildlife predator control programs,
including the coyote snaring program contemplated by § 10 I 05. However, for the reasons set
forth in this and my June 21 letter, we do not believe that these statutes require the
Commissioner to maintain a coyote snaring program.
I hope that this fully and unambiguously answers your question. Thank you for giving me
this opportunity to clarify my earlier response.
GSR/djp
G. Steven Rowe
Attorney General