ME Insurance Bulletin 405
Price Optimization and Elasticity of Demand
STATE OF MAINE
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
AND FINANCIAL REGULATION
BUREAU OF INSURANCE
34 STATE HOUSE STATION
AUGUSTA, MAINE
04333-0034
Paul R. LePage
GOVERNOR
Eric A. Cioppa
Superintendent
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
O F F IC E S L O C A T ED A T 76 N O R T H ER N AV EN U E, G A R D IN ER, M AI N E 04345
www.maine.gov/insurance
Phone: (207) 624-8475 TTY: Please call Maine Relay 711 Customer Complaint: 1-800-300-5000 Fax (207) 624-8599
Bulletin 405
Price Optimization and Elasticity of Demand
The Superintendent of Insurance directs this Bulletin to insurers required to file rates for personal
lines property and casualty insurance in Maine. It has come to the Superintendent’s attention
that some insurers’ rates include factors, unrelated to underwriting, that consider the point at
which a policyholder will look for coverage elsewhere because of increases in the premium
charged. Their ratemaking methodologies make use of data analysis techniques that have been
developed to test the willingness of individual customers to pay higher rates for coverage than
other customers with similar underwriting characteristics. Common terms used in describing this
practice are “price optimization” and “elasticity of demand.”
This Bulletin reminds insurers that their rates must comply with several important provisions of
Maine law:
• First, rates “shall not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory.”1
• Second, in making rates, insurers must give “due consideration” to, among other factors,
past and prospective loss experience; fire and catastrophe hazards; reasonable margins for
underwriting profit and contingencies; dividends, savings or unabsorbed premium
deposits allowed or returned by insurers to policyholders, members or subscribers; past
and prospective expenses; and other relevant factors.2
• Third, each “insurer shall file with the superintendent … every manual rate, minimum
premium, class rate, rating schedule or rating plan and every other rating rule, and every
modification of any of the foregoing that it proposes to use.”3
• Fourth, no property or casualty insurer “shall make or permit any unfair discrimination
between insureds or property having like insuring or risk characteristics in the premium
or rates charged for insurance, or in the dividends or other benefits payable thereon, or in
any other of the terms and conditions of the insurance.”4
1 24-A M.R.S. § 2303(1)(B)
2 24-A M.R.S. § 2303(1)(C)
3 24-A M.R.S. § 2304-A(1)
4 24-A M.R.S. § 2162(2)
– 2 –
These statutes evidence a clear purpose in Maine that insurers classify risks according to
actuarially supported considerations grounded in insurance loss and expense and disclose those
considerations fully in their rate filings. Failure to do so puts insurers at high risk of violating
Maine rating law.
The Superintendent does not intend this Bulletin to prohibit or restrict such practices as capping
or transitional pricing if applied on a group basis. Insurers should group individual policyholders
into credible risk-based classifications and treat similarly situated policyholders the same with
respect to insurance pricing. Likewise, the use of sophisticated data analysis to develop finely
tuned methodologies with a multiplicity of possible rating cells is not, in and of itself, necessarily
a violation of Maine’s rating laws as long as the classifications are based strictly on risk of loss
and not on willingness to pay or “elasticity of demand.”
Any insurer that uses price optimization to rate policies delivered or issued for delivery in Maine
should submit revised filings that remove such factors within 60 days after the date of this
Bulletin. Insurers must also disclose on the SERFF General Information page whether the
company uses non-risk-related factors such as price optimization or elasticity of demand to help
determine personal insurance premiums. Insurers with currently pending rate filings should
amend them to disclose this information. Companies that fail to do so and are later determined
to have used price optimization or elasticity of demand or failed to disclose such use to the
Superintendent may be subject to disciplinary action.
August 24, 2015
Eric A. Cioppa
Superintendent of Insurance
NOTE: This Bulletin is intended solely for informational purposes. It is not intended to set forth legal
rights, duties, or privileges, nor is it intended to provide legal advice. Readers should consult applicable
statutes and rules and contact the Bureau of Insurance if additional information is needed.