MI DIFS Bulletin 2019-06-INS

2020 Form and Rate Filing Requirements for Medical Plans Bulletin 2019-06-INS

Year: 2019Length: 3,918 wordsOfficial source
- 1 - STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES In the matter of 2020 Form and Rate Filing Requirements for Medical Plans Bulletin 2019-06-INS / Issued and entered this 25th day of April 2019 by Anita G. Fox Director This bulletin supersedes Bulletin 2019-04-INS, issued on March 21, 2019. Please note: the only changes between Bulletin 2019-04-INS and this bulletin are: 1) the elimination of the ability for plans to adopt mid-year formulary changes; and 2) differences in the maximum out-of-pocket limits. These changes were necessitated by the issuance of the federal Final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2020. SECTION 1: CERTIFICATION AND RECERTIFICATION FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAL PLANS ON- AND OFF-MARKETPLACE General Information DIFS will continue to perform Plan Management Functions for PY20. Plan Management functions are part of DIFS’ regulatory role for products offered on- and off-Marketplace. Issuers will work directly with DIFS to submit all Qualified Health Plan (QHP) application data in accordance with federal and state guidelines. SERFF will be used by issuers to transmit information to DIFS, and DIFS will use SERFF to transmit information to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Many of the same guidelines apply to issuers filing plans offered off-Marketplace and these items are referenced in this Bulletin. Issuers will again be required by CMS to register for the CCIIO Plan Management Community (PM Community). This platform will be utilized to issue all notices, including corrections and notifications. New Plans and Recertification of QHPs For PY20, DIFS’ process for certification and recertification of a QHP is consistent with the process used in prior plan year. Issuers submitting previously-approved - 2 - plans for recertification will be required to submit much of the same information as for prior plan years. Issuers submitting plans for certification for the first time should review the pertinent federal and state guidance. The omission of any federal or state requirement from this Bulletin should not be construed to mean that compliance with those requirements is not necessary. For additional guidance, issuers are urged to refer to the 2020 Final Letter to Issuers in the Federallyfacilitated Exchanges (Final Letter). Per the Final Letter, QHP issuers will no longer need to demonstrate meaningful difference. PY20 Submission Timelines DIFS has established the following submission dates for Michigan issuers to file their proposed Forms, Rates and Binders for PY20 for small group and individual markets: Small Group Small group issuers submit Forms, Rates and Binders for all on- and off- Marketplace plans in SERFF by May 15, 2019. Rate filing justifications must also be submitted into the URR Module of HIOS by this date. See Exhibit 1 and 2 for the list of required templates and documents. Individual Individual issuers submit Forms, Rates and Binders for all on- and off- Marketplace plans in SERFF by June 12, 2019. Rate filing justifications must also be submitted into the URR Module of HIOS by this date. See Exhibit 1 and 2 for the list of required templates and documents Please note with regard to small group and individual rates, these are to be the issuers’ final rates, with the Rate Filing Justification Parts I, II and III, and related supporting documents. Please note: DIFS will not accept changes to the Rates Table Template after the submission deadline, unless the changes are required by DIFS as part of the rate review process. - 3 - All Small Group and Individual Products: on- and off-Marketplace Activity Small Group Dates Individual Dates DIFS Submission (Exhibit 1) Filing Deadline – Forms & Rates and Binder 5/15/19 6/12/19 DIFS 1st transfer of plan data to CMS 6/19/19 DIFS 2nd transfer of plan data to CMS 7/24/19 CMS releases 1st correction notices 8/9/19 Service Area Petition deadline 8/12/19 Final Review DIFS final transfer of plan data to CMS 8/21/19 CMS reviews final QHP applications 8/22/19 to 9/9/19 QHP Agreement/ Final Certification CMS posts QHP agreements, plan lists and sends final correction notices; Issuers send signed agreements and final Plan Crosswalks 9/16/19 to 9/24/19 Limited data correction window and last date to withdraw plans 9/19/19 to 9/20/19 DIFS sends final plan recommendations 9/16/19 to 9/24/19 CMS sends Certification Notices 10/3/19 to 10/4/19 Open Enrollment 11/1/19 to 12/15/19 - 4 - PY20 Filing Requirements A complete submission includes the SERFF Form/Rate filing and Binder, with all required validated templates and associated items, as outlined in Exhibit 1. Issuers are required to run the PY20 QHP Application Tools and the Data Integrity Tool for the initial and any subsequent template submissions. Please note: only one Business Rules Template needs to be completed and should include both individual and small group plans. However, the Business Rules Template must be submitted in both the individual and small group SERFF Form/Rate filing and Binder. PY20 Quality Improvement Strategy Filing Requirement An issuer participating in the Marketplace for two or more consecutive years must implement and report on a Quality Improvement Strategy (QIS), in accordance with section 1311(g) of the Affordable Care Act. Issuers should consult the QHP Certification Application Materials for instructions on how to meet the QIS requirements for the PY20 QHP Application Period. Issuers must complete and submit a QIS Implementation Plan to DIFS. The QIS Implementation Plan and Progress Report Form must be submitted to DIFS via SERFF and included in the issuer’s Binder. The deadline for submitting this form in the small group market is May 15, 2019, and the deadline for the individual market is June 12, 2019. PY20 Checklist Requirements Checklists that must be completed and filed as shown in Exhibit 1 are: • Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans–Forms (FIS 2307); • Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans–Rates (FIS 2306); • Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans–Network Adequacy (FIS 2313). Revisions to Previously-Approved QHPs: Red-Lined Versions Issuers revising previously-approved QHP forms must provide red-lined versions, as well as clean versions. The red-lined and clean versions should both be filed under the Forms Schedule tab of the SERFF Form/Rate filing under the same document number. Please note: forms not being revised must still be submitted. Complaint and Grievance Procedures under the Patient’s Right to Independent Review Act (PRIRA), PA 251 of 2000 (MCL 550.1901 to 550.1929) must include - 5 - the DIFS PRIRA link in addition to the DIFS fax number, email address and mailing address. File Naming Certain items under the Supporting Documentation tab in the Form/Rate filing and/or Binder filing must adhere to a standard naming convention as follows: IssuerName_MIFormDescription_Version#. The purpose of adherence to a standard naming convention is to have the ability to track new versions as they are updated on the system. It is important to start with Version 1 and use the same issuer name and form description in the file name each time. In addition, all review tools must be run each time a template is revised. Items that are required to have a standard naming convention are: • DIFS Medical Forms Checklist; • DIFS Medical Rates Checklist; • DIFS Medical Network Adequacy Checklist; • MI Network Data Template; • Rates Table Template; • Actuarial Memorandum; • URRT; • MI Uniform Modification Justification form; • Justifications and Attestations; • Summary of Benefits and Coverage; • Any document that is amended from its original version that is not automatically versioned through SERFF. Transitional Plans Pursuant to prior CMS guidance, DIFS Order 18-030-M extended the transitional policy so long as policies did not remain in force beyond December 31, 2019. Issuers with active transitional programs should develop a process to end these policies and advise insureds of their options for coverage. Standardized Plans Standardized options are not available for PY20. SERFF Filings All filings submitted via SERFF (on- and/or off-Marketplace) are considered to be public immediately upon being filed in SERFF. All federal and Michigan-specific templates must be filed in the Form/Rate filing and in the Binder in Excel (xlsm) formats. Do not submit templates in PDF. Additionally, do not submit templates in the Supporting Documentation tab of the Binder, except - 6 - for the Plan ID Crosswalk and MI Network Data templates. Guaranteed Renewability All individual and small group plans offered on- and off-Marketplace must comply with federal and state law regarding guaranteed renewability, including all applicable federal regulations and guidance, and DIFS Bulletin 2011-17-INS. Product Withdrawal Plans may be withdrawn in accordance with the timeline published in the Final Letter. The final opportunity to withdraw plans will be during the plan confirmation process. Issuers opting to withdraw must submit the following in both the SERFF Form/Rate filing and Binder: 1. A completed CMS Plan Withdrawal form for plans offered either on- Marketplace or on- and off-Marketplace or a list of plans to be withdrawn for those offered off-Marketplace only. 2. A letter to the DIFS Director outlining the issuer’s intent and how it will comply with both state and federal guaranteed renewability and availability requirements. 3. A copy of the proposed letter that will be sent to enrollees/consumers outlining the issuer’s intent and detailing all options available to the enrollee/consumer, including seeking coverage from a different issuer. This letter must not be sent to enrollees/consumers until approved by DIFS. Please note: Do not make changes to templates. Also, pursuant to Michigan statute, MCL 500.2213b(6), once an issuer withdraws from a nongroup or group market completely, there is a 5-year waiting period during which that issuer may not issue health coverage in the market from which it withdrew. Uniform Modification and Plan ID Crosswalk DIFS requires that the Michigan Uniform Modification Justification form FIS 2316 and Plan ID Crosswalk be submitted as shown on Exhibit 1. CMS requires that the Plan ID Crosswalk Template, together with authorization from DIFS, be submitted to CCIIO Plan Management Community for QHPs in the individual market. The deadline for this submission will be posted soon at the PM Community website. Licensure and Good Standing DIFS will review the licensure status of all issuers filing plans on- and/or off- Marketplace. Annual Limit on Cost-Sharing - 7 - The PY20 out-of-pocket maximums for Marketplace-certified QHPs are $8,150 for individuals and $16,300 for families. Changes to Cost-Sharing After the initial transfer to CMS, changes made to copay amounts and coinsurance percentages cannot be made without DIFS’ approval. Service Area An issuer may not make service area changes after the initial submission to DIFS, unless the issuer petitions CMS for a data change and receives CMS approval, even if the change is in response to direction from DIFS or CMS. Petitioning CMS requires submitting a data change request which includes a signed Data Change Request Form, justification for the change, and evidence of state authorization by August 12, 2019, to allow CMS enough time for review. Upon CMS’ approval of the petition, and prior to the final data submission deadline, issuers must submit documents and templates impacted by service area change in SERFF Binder. Please see QHP Certification Application Materials for information about what constitutes a service area change, to access required forms, and other service area related resources. CMS requires that any partial service areas (geographic areas smaller than a county) must be established without regard to racial, ethnic, language, or health status factors, or other factors that exclude specific high utilizing, high cost or medically underserved populations. Issuers with partial service areas must submit a partial service area justification in the Supporting Documentation tab of the SERFF Binder. Issuers should refer to the CMS Service Area Partial County Justification Instructions regarding acceptable reasons for partial service areas. Partial service area requests will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Network Adequacy For PY20, the standard for network adequacy review is unchanged from PY19 and the Michigan Network Adequacy Guidance reflects network sufficiency standards and requirements. See also Network Data Template Instructions and Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans – Network Adequacy. Essential Community Providers For PY20, the review of Essential Community Providers (ECP) is unchanged from PY19. For ECP requirements, see the Final Letter and the Final Notice. Patient Safety Standards As outlined in the Final Letter, issuers contracting with hospitals with more than 50 - 8 - beds must verify that the hospital (as defined in section 1861(e) of the Social Security Act) is Medicare-certified or has been issued a Medicaid-only CMS Certification Number. To comply with this requirement, issuers must include in their Binder submission, within the Supporting Documentation tab, an attestation that the issuer has collected and is maintaining the required documentation from its network hospitals. SECTION 2: CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANS) Readability Submitted forms must comply with the following readability standards found under MCL 500.2236(3): 1. The readability score must be based on the Microsoft Word Flesch Reading Ease test and have a score of 45 or higher. Forms with a Microsoft Word Flesch Reading Ease score lower than 45 will not be approved by DIFS or transferred to CMS for certification. 2. Health care policies, contracts, and certificates, dental policies and certificates, and certificates of coverage with more than 3,000 words printed on not more than three pages, or more than three pages of text regardless of the number of words, shall contain a table of contents. (This requirement does not apply to riders or endorsements.) 3. Each form must be printed in font size not less than 10 point. Each form entered in the SERFF Forms Schedule tab shall include the form’s readability score. Actuarial Value (AV) Requirements All individual and small group plans offered on- and off-Marketplace must be assigned to one of the approved “metal level” AV tiers or be classified as a catastrophic plan. Determinations of AV must conform to 45 CFR 156.140. Religious Employer Exemption DIFS will allow issuers providing benefits for religious employers, non-profit religious employers or closely held for profit companies with strong religious beliefs who qualify for contraceptive coverage exemptions under federal rules to include additional language describing the administration of these benefits. The purpose of the additional language will be to clarify for employees that: 1. The employer will not contract, arrange, or pay for contraceptive benefits for employees. 2. The issuer will instead provide contraceptive benefits for employees (including notification to employee). 3. The costs for these benefits are not included in the program paid for the healthcare coverage. - 9 - Essential Health Benefits (EHB) EHB Benchmark Plan Issuers must use Michigan’s 2017 benchmark plan. Michigan has made no changes to its benchmark plan. Issuers should review the benchmark to ensure their plans on- and off-Marketplace conform to it. Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) All individual and small group plans must comply with the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and applicable regulations. In particular, issuers should carefully review the final rule implementing the MHPAEA, issued on November 13, 2013, and generally applicable to plan and policy years on or after July 1, 2014. Issuers should review the final rule to determine whether a particular plan is subject to the MHPAEA and is in compliance with that statute and regulations. Actuarially Equivalent Substitutions of EHB Actuarially equivalent substitutions of EHB are not permitted in Michigan. Anti-Discrimination in EHB DIFS will review policy and certificate forms for compliance with all provisions of federal and state anti-discrimination law, including but not limited to section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, 42 USC 18116. Issuers are encouraged to review in its entirety the Final Rule on Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities, which is set forth at 45 CFT Part 92 (Final Rule). The Final Rule prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, and disability. Regarding age limits specifically: note that, under the Final Rule, age limits that are included by statute are generally permissible (for example, in Michigan’s autism mandate), but age limits not found in statute may be prohibited. DIFS will review policy and certificate forms for impermissible age limits. Rehabilitative and Habilitative Services; Autism Spectrum Disorder All plans must cover at least 30 visits for speech therapy, plus a combined 30 visits for physical and occupational therapy for rehabilitative services. For PY20, plans must also cover at least the same number of visits for habilitative services. However, for treatment of autism spectrum disorder specifically, plans may not limit the number of visits for any mandated type of treatment, including speech therapy, physical therapy and occupational therapy. - 10 - SECTION 3: CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (APPLICABLE TO ON-MARKETPLACE PLANS ONLY) Accreditation 45 CFR 155.1045 establishes the timeline by which issuers offering plans on- Marketplace must be accredited by NCQA, URAC or AAAHC. An issuer’s accreditation status will be available to consumers at the Marketplace website. Summary of Benefits and Coverage DIFS requires the 2018 form of Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC). This form applies to individual and small group on-Marketplace plans beginning on or after April 1, 2017. Each plan must have its own unique, SBC, with the associated URL link noted in the Plans and Benefits Template. SECTION 4: RATING REQURIEMENTS (APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANS) DIFS will not accept more than one filing per market (individual or small group). Issuers that offer both PPO/EPO or HMO/POS must submit both filings in the same Form/Rate filing. Per the Final Notice, the Part II Justification remains at 15%. Issuers must use only the revised URRT. Required Cost-Sharing Variations for Individual Market Plans Only 45 CFR 156.420 requires several cost-sharing plan variations for issuers offering coverage in the individual market on-Marketplace. Issuers must submit for approval the three plan variations for each silver plan offered, and the zero and limited cost-sharing variations for each plan at the platinum, gold, silver, and bronze metal levels. Due to the lack of federal legislation appropriating CSR payments, DIFS requires issuers to submit rates assuming no CSR payments will be made (CSR load). These rates apply only to on-Marketplace silver plan premiums. The actuarial memorandum should disclose the amount of CSR load included in the silver rates and the methodology for determining the load. Support should include current and projected distribution of silver members by variant level (70/73/87/94) and the associated rate impacts that produce the overall CSR load. Rating Factors Rates may vary based only on the following factors: • Rating area; • Age (within a ratio of 3:1 for adults); • Tobacco use (within a ratio of 1.5:1). - 11 - Additional Michigan Rating Factor Determinations Michigan has made the following determinations related to the allowable rating factors, applicable to all individual and small group plans: Age Rating Michigan plans must adhere to the 3:1 ratio and federal default age curve for both individual and small group markets. The federal default age curve, applicable for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, is detailed in CMS Insurance Standards Bulletin: Guidance Regarding Age Curves and State Reporting, Dec. 16, 2016. Tobacco Ratio Issuers will not be required to use a tobacco ratio less than 1.5:1. Issuers will be allowed to vary their tobacco ratio based on age, if the ratio does not exceed 1.5:1 for any specific age. Standard Family Tier Michigan will not allow the use of a standard family tier. Per-Member Rating Michigan requires per-member rating in the small group market. Issuers wishing to offer small employers the option to be billed on an equivalent1 composite premium basis must comply with the requirements set forth at 45 CFR 147.102(c)(3), including the development of separate composite premiums for individuals age 21 and older and individuals under age 21. Geographic Rating For PY20, Michigan will continue using the previously-defined 16 geographic areas for both the individual and small group market. The 16 defined geographic areas, with each of the 83 counties in Michigan, labeled A through P, can be found on the DIFS website here. 1 Equivalent means that the total group premium determined at the beginning of the plan year under the composite method is the same as the total group premium determined on a per-member basis. - 12 - Merging of Markets Pursuant to 45 CFR 156.80, Michigan requires issuers to maintain separate risk pools for the individual and small group markets. SECTION 5: WELLNESS PLANS General Guidelines Wellness plans, either participatory or health-contingent, may be offered with both individual and small group plans. Any wellness plan must: • Meet the requirements of 45 CFR 146.121 and 147.110; and • Be a part of the policy (i.e., not offered separately). Small Group Plans that Rate for Tobacco Use Issuers must include a health-contingent wellness plan in the small group market if they are rating for tobacco use. The plan must provide for a reduction or elimination of the tobacco rating if the insured participates in a tobacco cessation program. The plan must also meet the requirements stated in the General Guidelines above. The plan materials must describe the conditions and benefits of the wellness plan; simply stating that a wellness plan is offered is not sufficient. Any questions regarding this bulletin should be directed to: Department of Insurance and Financial Services Office of Insurance Rates and Forms 530 West Allegan Street, 7th Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 Toll Free: (877) 999-6442 /s/ Anita G. Fox Director Exhibit 1 – Forms PY20 Medical Plans Filing Requirements Requires Submission via SERFF Federal Required Templates On- and On-/Off- Marketplace Off-Marketplace SERFF Location: Essential Community Providers/Network Adequacy Yes No Binder only Plans and Benefits Yes Yes Binder only Service Area Yes Yes Binder only Network ID Yes Yes Binder only Prescription Drug Yes Yes Binder only Rates Table Yes Yes Form/Rate Filing & Binder Business Rules – One per Issuer, include both Individual and Small Group on the same template Yes Yes Form/Rate Filing & Binder Accreditation Yes No Binder only Plan ID Crosswalk (Individual only)* Yes Yes Binder only Michigan Required Documents Michigan Network Data Template* Yes Yes Binder only Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans – Forms Yes Yes Form/Rate Filing & Binder Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans – Network Adequacy Yes Yes Binder only MI Uniform Modification Justification Form Yes Yes Form/Rate Filing & Binder Filing Deadlines Small Group 5/15/2019 Individual 6/12/2019 NOTE: All required templates must be completed and, if applicable, validated before filing. Use of PY20 QHP Application Tools and Data Integrity Tool is required for the initial template and any subsequent template submissions. All template revisions must be uploaded to the same locations as originally filed (i.e. SERFF Form/Rate Filing, Binder or BOTH). *Except for the Plan ID Crosswalk and MI Network Data templates, do not submit templates in the Supporting Documentation tab of the Binder. * Subject to final CMS notification. Exhibit 2 – Rates PY20 Medical Plans Filing Requirements Requires Submission via SERFF Federal Required Templates On- and On-/Off- Marketplace Off- Marketplace Requires Submission via HIOS SERFF Location: Part I: Unified Rate Review (URRT) Yes Yes Yes Form/Rate Filing & Binder Part II: Written Description Justifying the Rate Increase * Yes, for plans that exceed the federal rate review threshold Yes, for plans that exceed the federal rate review threshold Yes, for plans that exceed the federal rate review threshold Form/Rate Filing & Binder Part III: Actuarial Memorandum Yes Yes Yes, for plans with any increase Form/Rate Filing & Binder Rates Table Yes Yes No Form/Rate Filing & Binder Michigan Required Templates Michigan Supplemental Health Care Exhibit Yes Yes No Form/Rate Filing & Binder Checklist for Individual and Small Group Medical Plans –Rates Yes Yes No Form/Rate Filing & Binder Filing Deadlines Small Group 5/15/2019 Individual 6/12/2019
MI DIFS Bulletin 2019-06-INS: 2020 Form and Rate Filing Requirements for Medical Plans Bulletin 2019-06-INS | Justis AI