R 299.9519
R 299.9519 Modification, revocation, and suspension of operating licenses during their terms.
Cite as Mich. Admin. Code R 299.9519
Rule 519. (1) An owner or operator shall construct, operate, and maintain a facility
pursuant to part 111, these rules, and the operating license issued to the facility pursuant to
part 111. Any deviation from the conditions of a license or from approved plans requires
prior approval by the director, unless otherwise specified in this rule, and, if necessary,
modification of the license.
(2) If the director receives any information during the term of an operating license, for
example, inspects the facility, receives information submitted by the licensee as required
in the license, receives a request for modification or revocation pursuant to this rule, or
conducts a review of the license file, then the director may determine if 1 or more of the
causes listed in subrule (3) of this rule for modification or subrule (11) of this rule for
revocation, or both, exist. If cause exists, the director may commence proceedings pursuant
to act 306 to modify or revoke an operating license accordingly, subject to the limitation
of subrule (4) of this rule, and may request an updated application under R 299.9520, if
necessary. If an operating license is modified, then only the conditions subject to
modification are reopened. If an operating license modification satisfies the criteria of
subrule (5) of this rule for a minor modification, or if the director has not yet been
authorized under 40 CFR part 271, then the license may be modified pursuant to
subrule (6) of this rule. Otherwise, a draft license must be prepared, and other procedures
specified in R 299.9511 followed.
(3) Any of the following are causes for modification of an operating license:
(a) The causes listed under 40 CFR 270.41(a), except 40 CFR 270.41(a)(3).
(b) If the standards or regulations on which the license was based have been changed by
statute, through promulgation of new or amended standards or regulations, or by judicial
decision after the license was issued.
(c) To modify a monitoring program under R 299.9611 or R 299.9612.
(d) Cause exists for modification under subrule (5) of this rule and the director determines
that modification is appropriate.
(e) The director has received notification pursuant to R 299.9522 of a proposed transfer
of ownership or operation.
(4) The director shall not consider suitability of the facility location at the time of
operating license modification, suspension, or revocation, or when reviewing an operating
license for a new facility or the expansion, enlargement, or alteration of an existing facility,
unless new information or standards indicate that a threat to human health or the
environment exists that was unknown at the time of license issuance. In addition, the
director shall not modify an operating license for a new facility or the expansion,
enlargement, or alteration of an existing facility beyond what is authorized in the license.
(5) The licensee may put into effect the following minor license modifications without
following the procedures specified in R 299.9511, if the licensee complies with subrule (6)
of this rule:
(a) Any of the following general license modifications:
(i) An administrative and information change.
(ii) A correction of a typographical error.
(iii) Equipment replacement or upgrading with functionally equivalent elements, for
example pipes, valves, pumps, conveyors, or controls.
(iv) A change in the frequency of, or procedures for, monitoring, reporting, sampling, or
maintenance activities to provide for more frequent monitoring, reporting, sampling, or
maintenance.
(v) A change in the interim compliance dates in the schedule of compliance if the prior
written approval of the director is obtained.
(vi) A change in the expiration date of the license to allow earlier license termination if
the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(vii) A change in the ownership or operational control of a facility if the procedures
specified in R 299.9522 are followed and if the prior written approval of the director is
obtained.
(viii) Changes to remove operating license conditions that are no longer applicable
because the standards upon which they are based are no longer applicable to the facility if
prior written approval from the director is obtained.
(ix) Changes to remove license conditions applicable to a unit excluded under
R 299.9204.
(x) Changes in the expiration date of a license issued to a facility at which all units are
excluded under R 299.9204.
(b) Any of the following general facility modifications:
(i) A change to waste sampling or analysis methods to conform to agency guidelines or
regulations.
(ii) A change to waste sampling or analysis methods to incorporate change associated
with F039, multisource leachate sampling or analysis methods.
(iii) A change to waste sampling or analysis methods to incorporate changes associated
with underlying hazardous constituents in ignitable or corrosive wastes if the prior written
approval of the director is obtained.
(iv) A change in a sampling or analysis procedure or monitoring schedule if the prior
written approval of the director is obtained.
(v) A change to analytical quality assurance/control plans to conform to department
guidelines or rules.
(vi) A change in procedures for maintaining the operating record.
(vii) A change in the contingency plan to reflect the replacement of emergency
equipment with functionally equivalent equipment, the upgrade of emergency equipment,
or the relocation of emergency equipment listed.
(viii) A change to the training plan, other than those changes that affect the type of, or
decrease the amount of, training given to employees.
(ix) The replacement of emergency equipment with functionally equivalent emergency
equipment, the upgrade of emergency equipment, or the relocation of emergency
equipment listed in the contingency plan.
(x) A change in the name, address, or phone number of a coordinator or another person
or agency identified in the contingency plan.
(xi) A change in the procedures used to empty hazardous waste from transport vehicles
and other containers.
(xii) A change that the construction quality assurance officer certifies will provide
equivalent or better certainty that the unit components meet the design specifications. The
certification must be provided in the facility operating record.
(c) Any of the following groundwater protection modifications:
(i) Replacement of an existing well that has been damaged or rendered inoperable
without changing the location, design, or depth of the well.
(ii) A change in groundwater sampling or analysis procedure or monitoring schedule if
the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(iii) A change in statistical procedure for determining whether a statistically significant
change in groundwater quality between upgradient and downgradient wells has occurred if
the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(d) Any of the following changes to closure plans:
(i) A change in the estimate of maximum inventory of waste on-site at any time during
the active life of the facility, not to exceed the approved process design capacity of the
facility if the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(ii) A change in the closure schedule for any unit, a change in the final closure schedule
for the facility, or extension of the closure period if the prior written approval of the director
is obtained.
(iii) A change in the expected year of final closure if other license conditions are not
changed and if the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(iv) A change in procedure for the decontamination of facility equipment or structures if
the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(v) The addition of temporary tanks used for neutralization, dewatering, phase
separation, or other separation with the prior written approval of the director.
(e) Any of the following postclosure modifications:
(i) A change in the name, address, or phone number of the contact person in the
postclosure plan.
(ii) A change in the expected year of final closure if other license conditions are not
changed.
(f) The addition of a roof to a container unit without altering the containment system.
(g) The replacement of a tank with a tank that complies with the same design standards,
has the same capacity of the replaced tank, and complies with the same conditions in the
license.
(h) The replacement of a waste pile unit with another waste pile unit of the same design
and capacity and that complies with all the waste pile conditions in the license.
(i) Any of the following land treatment modifications:
(i) A decreased rate of waste application.
(ii) A change in any condition specified in the license for a land treatment unit to reflect
the results of the land treatment demonstration if performance standards are met and if the
prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(iii) A change to allow a second land treatment demonstration to be conducted when the
results of the first demonstration have not shown the conditions under which the wastes
can be treated completely if the conditions for the second demonstration are substantially
the same as the conditions for the first demonstration and if the prior written approval of
the director is obtained.
(j) Any of the following incinerator, boiler, or industrial furnace modifications:
(i) Authorization of up to an additional 720 hours of waste burning during the
shakedown period for determining operation readiness after construction if the prior written
approval of the director is obtained.
(ii) A change in the operating requirements specified in the license for conducting a trial
burn if the change is minor and if the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(iii) A change in the ranges of the operating requirements specified in the license to
reflect the results of the trial burn, if the change is minor and if the prior written approval
of the director is obtained.
(iv) Substitution of an alternate type of nonhazardous waste fuel that is not specified in
the license if the prior written approval of the director is obtained.
(v) Technology changes necessary to meet the standards under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart EEE, if the owner or operator met the notification of intent to comply requirements
of 40 CFR 63.1210 that were in effect before October 11, 2000, and if prior written
approval is obtained from the director.
(k) Technology changes necessary to meet the standards under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart EEE, that were promulgated on October 12, 2005, if the owner or operator met the
notification of intent to comply requirements of 40 CFR 63.1210(b) and 63.1212(a) and if
prior written approval is obtained from the director.
(l) Waiver of operating and emission limits as necessary to support the transition to
40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE, if all the following requirements are met and if prior written
approval is obtained from the director:
(i) The specific operating and emission limits for which the waiver is requested must be
identified in writing.
(ii) An explanation of why the changes are necessary to minimize or eliminate conflicts
between the license and the maximum achievable control technology standards compliance
must be provided in writing.
(iii) An explanation of how the raised provisions will be sufficiently protective must be
provided in writing.
(iv) If the modification is being requested in conjunction with maximum achievable
control technology performance testing where the license limits may only be waived during
actual test events and pretesting, as defined under 40 CFR 63.1207(h)(2), for an aggregate
time not to exceed 720 hours of operation, the request must be provided at the same time
the test plans are submitted to the director. The director may approve or deny the request
contingent upon approval of the test plans.
(m) Any of the following burden reduction changes:
(i) The development of 1 contingency plan based on integrated contingency plan
guidance pursuant to 40 CFR 264.52(b).
(ii) Changes to recordkeeping or reporting requirements under 40 CFR 264.56(i),
264.113(e)(5), 264.196(f), 264.343(a)(2), 264.1061(b)(1), 264.1062(a), or
R 299.9629(11).
(iii) Changes to the inspection frequency for tank systems under 40 CFR 264.195(b).
(iv) Changes to a detection or a compliance monitoring program under
40 CFR 264.98(d) or (g)(2) or (3), or 264.99(f) or (g).
(6) For minor license modifications, the licensee shall do both of the following:
(a) Notify the director concerning the minor modification by certified mail or other means
that establish proof of delivery. For minor modifications that do not require the prior
written approval of the director, the notification must be made within 7 calendar days after
the change is put into effect. For minor modifications that do require the prior written
approval of the director, the notification must be made before the change is put into effect.
The notification must comply with all the following provisions:
(i) Contain a minor modification request for the director's approval, if required.
(ii) Specify the exact change or changes being made or to be made to the license
conditions or supporting documents referenced by the license.
(iii) Identify that the modification is a minor modification.
(iv) Explain why the modification is necessary.
(v) Provide the applicable information required pursuant to R 299.9504 and R 299.9508,
as appropriate.
(b) Send a notice of the minor modification to all persons on the facility mailing list that
is maintained by the director pursuant to 40 CFR 124.10(c)(ix) and the appropriate units of
state and local government pursuant to 40 CFR 124.10(c)(x). The notification must be
made within 90 days after the change is put into effect. For minor modifications that
require the prior written approval of the director, the notification must made within
90 calendar days after the director approves the minor modification request.
(7) Any person may request that the director review any minor license modification. The
director may reject for cause. The director shall inform the licensee by certified mail that
a minor license modification has been rejected and explain the reasons for the rejection. If
a minor license modification is rejected, the licensee shall comply with the existing license
conditions.
(8) For minor license modifications, the licensee may elect to follow the procedures
specified in R 299.9511 instead of the license modification procedures. The licensee shall
inform the director of this decision in the notice that is required in subrule (6) of this rule.
(9) Any modification that is not specifically listed in subrule (5) of this rule is considered a
major license modification and is subject to the requirements of R 299.9511 and R 299.9520,
unless all the following conditions are met:
(a) The licensee demonstrates, to the director's satisfaction, that a modification meets the
criteria for a minor modification. In determining the appropriate classification for a
modification, the director shall consider the similarity of the modification to other
modifications listed in subrule (5) of this rule. Minor modifications apply to minor changes
that keep the license current with routine changes to the facility or its operation. These
changes do not substantially alter the license conditions or reduce the capacity of the
facility to protect human health or the environment.
(b) The modification does not authorize the physical construction of a new treatment,
storage, or disposal facility; the expansion or enlargement beyond the previously
authorized design capacity or area of a treatment, storage, or disposal facility; or the
alteration of the method of treatment or disposal previously authorized at a treatment,
storage, or disposal facility to a different method of treatment or disposal.
(c) The classification of the modification is not less stringent than that allowed under
RCRA.
(10) For major license modifications, the licensee shall submit a major modification
request to the director by certified mail or by other means that establish proof of delivery.
The request must be made before the change is put into effect. The request must comply
with all the following provisions:
(a) Describe the exact change or changes to be made to the license conditions or
supporting documents referenced by the license.
(b) Identify that the modification is a major modification.
(c) Explain why the modification is necessary.
(d) Provide the applicable information required under R 299.9504 and R 299.9508, as
appropriate.
(11) An operating license may be revoked for any of the following reasons:
(a) Noncompliance by the licensee with part 111 these rules, or any condition of the
operating license.
(b) A determination that the licensed activity endangers human health or the
environment.
(c) The owner or operator fails in the application or during the operating license issuance
process to disclose fully all relevant facts or at any time misrepresents any relevant facts.
(12) Requests for operating license modification by a licensee and updated applications
requested by the director pursuant to subrule (2) of this rule must be made on forms
provided by the director.
(13) An operating license may be suspended pursuant to act 306.
(14) 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE, and 264.52(b), 264.56(i), 264.98(d) and (g)(2) and (3),
264.99(f) and (g), 264.113(e)(5), 264.195(b), 264.196(f), 264.343(a)(2), 264.1061(b)(1),
264.1062(a), 270.41(a), except 40 CFR 270.41(a)(3), are adopted by reference in
R 299.11003.