The term “public works” as used in Section 290.210(7), RSMo 1969, of the prevailing wages law means structural works having a permanent character and usefulness, such as roads, buildings, bridges, and dams. The term “maintenance work,” Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969, means the repair or restoration of that portion of an existing facility which has fallen into a state of deterioration or decay to its original condition. “Maintenance work” does not include “major” repairs or “replacement;” the latter constitute “construction.” “Replacement” entails the complete substitution of an existing facility with a new or different facility. Installing a central air conditioning unit in a public building constitutes “construction” within the meaning of Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969, if the building was formerly without such a unit. Substituting a new central air conditioning unit or furnace in a public building in place of a deteriorated or worn out unit or furnace also constitutes “construction.” However, replacing a worn out part of a central air conditioning unit or furnace in order to restore the unit or furnace to operational condition constitutes “maintenance work” within the meaning of Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969. Installing new or different partitions in a public building, either at the location of former partitions or at a different location, and rearranging present partitions constitutes “construction,” Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. However, restoring an existing partition to sound condition by repairing the deteriorated portion constitutes “maintenance work,” Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969. Tarring a roof of a public building constitutes “maintenance work,” Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969, if the roof is in a state of disrepair or deterioration, otherwise it would be “construction,” Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. Putting an entirely new roof on a public building constitutes “construction,” Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. Installing new garage doors on a public building constitutes “construction,” Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. Seal coating small cracks in the surface of an asphalt highway constitutes “maintenance work,” Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969.

·., 0 PREVAILING WAGE LAW: PUBLIC WORKS: The term "public works" as used in Section 290. 210(7), RSMo 1969, of the prevailing wages law means struc- tural works having a permanent character and usefulness, such as roads, buildings bridges, and dams. The term "maintenance work," Section 290. 210 ( ~), RSMo 1969, mea.ns the repair or restoration of that portion of an existing facility which has fallen into a state of deterioration or decay to its original condition. "Maintenance workn does not include "major" repairs or "replacement;" the latter constitute ''construction." "Replacement" entails the complete sub- stitution of an existing facility with a new or different facility. Installing a cehtral air conditioning unit in a public building constitutes "construction" within the meaning of Section 290 .210 (1), RSMo 1969, if the building was formerly without such a unit. Sub- stituting a new central air conditioning unit or furnace in a public building in place of a deteriorated or worn out unit or furnace also constitutes "construction." However, replacing a worn out part of a central air conditioning unit or furnace in order to restore the unit or furnace to operational condition consti- tutes "maintenance work" within the meaning of Section 290 . 210(4), RSMo 1969. Installing new or different partitions in a public building, either at the location of former par titions or at a different location, and rearranging present partitions constitutes "construction," Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. However, restoring an existing partition to sound condition by repairing the deteri- orated portion constitutes "maintenance work," Section 290.210(4) , RSMo 1969 . Tarring a roof of a public building constitutes "main- tenance work, 11 Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969, if the roof is in a state of disrepair or deterioration , otherwise it would be "con- struction," Section 290 . 210(1), RSMo 1969. Putting an entirely new roof on a public building constitutes "constrtiction," Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. Installing new garage doors on a public builc;ling constitutes "construction," Section 290 . 210(1 ), RSMo 1969. Seal coating small cracks in the surface of an asphalt highway constitutes "maintenance work," Section 290 . 210(4), RSMo 1969. October 20, 1970 Honorable Richard M. Marshall State Representative Forty- third District Suite 519 111 South Bemiston Avenue Clayton, Missouri 63105 Dear Representative Marshall: OPINION NO. 32 FILED ~ .._ __ .,._ __ _ This opinion is issued in response to your request for an opinion regarding the meaning of the statutory definitions of . ,, a tJ Honorable Richard M. Marshall "public works," Section 290.210(7), RSMo 1969, and "maintenance work," Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969. Speci fic reference i s made to the coverage and application of the above definiti ons with regard to the following examples: r eplacement of a central air conditioni ng unit, furnace, changing of partitions, tarring a roof or putting on a new r oof, putting on new garage doors, re- sealing a street. , Section 290.210 - 290.340, RSMo 1969, is known as the pre- bailing wages on public wdrks law . The law applies to construction of public works by private contractors under contract with a public body . It does not apply to construction of public works by a public body's own employees. Opinion of the Attorney Gener al No. 351, Vogelsmeier, August 3, 1970. (Copy attached.) Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969, defines "construction" as follows : " (1) ' Construction ' includes construction, reconstruction, improvement, enlargement, alteration, painting and decorating, or major repair." The legislature may provide that cert ain words shall be defined or construed in a particular manner, but where statutory definitions are couched in general terms, it is necessary to apply normal rules of construction to ascertain the legislative intent. 82. C.J.S . Statutes, Section 315 . ' According to the ruled maxim of noscitur a sociis doubtful words and phrases used in statutes are constructed in connection with the words and phrases with which they are associated . 82 C.J .S. Statutes, Section 331. Under this rule the meaning of a word may be enlarged or restricted by reference to the whole clause in which it is used. O'Malley v. Continental Life Ins. Co., 75 S.W. 2d 837 (Mo . 1934). By expressly including "painting and decorating" and "major repairs" within the statutory definition of "construction" in Sec- tion 290.210(1), RSMo 1969, it is apparent that the legislature intended to enlarge the meaning of the word "construction" so as to include more than is normally comprised with the ordinary meaning of the word. Section 290.120(7), RSMo 1969, defines "public works" as follows: "(7) ' Public works' means all fixed works constr ucted for public use or benefit or paid for wholly or in part out of public - 2- .. 0 Honorable Richard M. Marshall funds. It also includes any work done directly by any public utility company when performed by it pursuant to the order of the public service commission or other public authority whether or not it be done under public supervision or direct- ion or paid for wholly or in part out of public funds when let to contract by said utility. It does not include any work done for or by any drainage or levee district." Section 1 . 090, RSMo 1969, provides that: "Words and phrases shall be taken in their plain or ordinary and usual sense, but technical words and phrases having a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law shall be understood according to their technical import." Judicial rules of statutory construction are to the same effect. State v. Hawks, 228 S.W.2d 785 (Mo . 1950) . The term "public works", as used in prevailing wage laws, has been judicially defined to embrace such things as bridges, sidewalks, traffic control signals, radio antennas, and park benches, Miele v. Joseph, 113 N. Y.S.2d 689 (1952), and railways, docks, canals, waterworks and roads~ Demeter Land Co. v. Florida Service Co., 128 So. 402 (Fla . 1930). Public In Carter v. City and County of Denver, 160 P.2d 991 (Colo. 1945), the Supreme Court of Colorado stated that the term public works as used in connection with contracts for construction of public works in the Colorado Prevailing Wage Law was meant to embrace building and other structural contracts. Services of a hospital employee were therefore not included within the term public works . Em lo ers ' Co. v. Stewart Abstract Co., 17 S.W. 2d 781 ( Comm. o ppea s, ex. , concerne he construction of the term "public works" as used in a statutory provision requiring contractors to execute a bond before entering a contract to con- struct public works. In that case the court stated that: " . .• every contract entered into, and every work undertaken by the state, county, munic- ipality, or other agency enumerated in the statute is necessarily, in the broadest sense, a 'public work,' for such agencies are public agencies and act only for the public. But - 3- Honorable Richard r~. Marshall obviously the words 'public work' were not used in that broad sense, for that would make the statute applicable to every con- tract of whatsoever character, a conclusion at once unreasonable. The 'public work' contemplated was meant to embrace those contracts akin to building contracts. This intention is not alone supported by the doc- trine of ejusdem generis, but other language of the statute itself accentuates that con- struction, for it gives the right of inter- vention and recovery upon the bond to those persons who have furnished labor or materials 'used in the construction or repair of any public building or public work.' The words 'construction or repair' have reference alike to public buildings and public works, and indicate structural work. Again , throughout the act the word 'contractor' is used. This term is apt in building, and other struc- tural, contracts but is inapt to those con- tracts which are essentially for services, supplies , equipment, and the like. The con- struction of a county road is a public work, but it could hardly be said that a contract for the purchase of a road grader would be a public work. Such grader would be in the nature of supply or equipment ••• " Id at 782 • • Thus, we believe the Legislature intended to use the term "public works" in Section 290 .210(7), RSMo 1969, to describe struc- tural works having a permanent character and usefulness, such as roads , buildings, bridges, and dams. As stated above, the Missouri Prevailing Wage Law, Sections 290.210 to 290 .340, RSMo 1969 , applies only to construction of public works by private contractors under contract with a public body. "Maintenance work'' on public works is specifically excluded from the scope of the law. Sections 290.220 , 290.230 , RSMo 1969 . Thus, employees of private contractors performing "maintenance work" on public works need not be paid prevailing wages. Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969, defines "maintenance work" as follows: "(4) ' Maintenance work' means the repair, but not the replacement, of existing facilities when the size, type or extent of the existing facilities is not thereby changed or increased." -4- n Honorable Richard M. Marshall The word "repair" contemplates restoring a structure or thing to a sound condition or keeping a structure in a state of pr eservation after decay, dilapidation, or partial destruction and necessarily presupposes that the structure has fallen into a state of deterior- ation . Gul f Ci t St . R • & R. E. Co. v. Cit of Galveston, 7 S. W. 520 (Tex. ; Travelers Indemnit Com an v. Wilkes Count , 116 S.E.2d 314 (Ga. App. 1 0 , Walker v. Dwelle, 1 5 N. W. 9 owa 1920). Wor k performed on existing facilities, or the elements or units of existing facilities, which are not in a state of dete- rioration does not constitute "maintenance work" , but comes within the statutory definition of "construction". "Maintenance work" therefore, can only be performed on that portion of an existing facility which has deteriorated from its original condition. "Major" repairs, however, constitute ''construction" not "maintenance work". Section 290 . 210(1), RSMo 1969. "Replacement" of existing facilities is specifically excluded from the statutory definition of "maintenance work" , and thereby included within the definition of "construction". Replacement of worn or deteriorated elements of a structure with similar or identical elements in order to restore the struc- ture to its original condition is generally considered synonymous with repairing. However, substituting all of the elements or units of a structure with new or different units is commonly construed as replacement or .recor-struction, not repair. Aro Mf~ . Co. v. Con- vertible To~ Rellacement Co., 365 U. S. 336, 81 S. t. 599, 5 L.Ed.2d 52 ( 961); Haussler v. Indemnity Co. of America, 227 Ill. App . -504 (1923); Mayer v. Morehead , 32 S.E. 349 (Ga. 1899) . You have requested our opinion concerning the coverage and application of the Missouri Prevailing Wage Law, Sections 290.210 to 290.340, RSMo 1969, with regard to the following examples: re- placement of a central air conditioning unit, furnace, changing of partitions, tarring a roof or putting on a new roof, putting on new garage doors, and resealing a street. In the absence of a detailed account of the factual setting of each example, it is difficult to provide an appropriate and responsive opinion. How- ever, by hypothesizing certain facts we are able to provide the following opinions for your guidance. Installing a central air conditioning unit in a public build- ing would constitute "construction", within the meaning of Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969 , in the event that the building was formerly without an air conditioning unit. Substituting a new central air conditioning unit in a public building in the place of a deteri- orated or worn out unit falls within the judicial definition of "replacement", and therefore also constitutes "construction" . How- -5- 0 Honorable Richard M. Marshall ever, i t i s our opinion that replacing a worn out part of a centr al air conditioning unit in a public building in order to restore the unit t o an operational condition constitutes a "repair" or "main- tenance work" . The above analysis regarding installing a central air con- ditioning unit ~n a public building applies with equal force to replaci ng a furnace. It is our opinion that installing new or di fferent partitions, eit her at the location of a former partition or at a different lo- cation, and rearranging present partitions constitutes "construction" within the meaning of Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. However, re- storing a deteriorated partition to sound condition constitutes "maintenance work" within the meani ng of Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969 . It is our opinion that tarring a roof of a public building constitutes "maintenance work" within the meaning of Section 290 . 210(4) , RSMo 1969, if the roof is in a state of disrepair or deteri orati on. Otherwise, tarring a roof of a public building would constitute "construction" within the meaning of Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. It is our opinion that putting an entire new roof on a public buildi ng falls within the above judicial definition of "replacement" or "reconstruction" , and therefore constitutes "construction" within the meaning of Section 290. 210(1), RSMo 1969. It is our opinion that putting new garage doors on a public building does not constitute "maintenance work" , but rather is "con- struction", because judicial definitions of "repair" entail restoring a deteriorated structure or article to its original condition, not substituting a new structure or article in its place . In Attorney General Opinion No. 56, Walsh, April 18, 1968, thi s offi ce expressed the opinion that seal coating small cracks in the surface of an asphalt highway did not constitute "construc- tion" within the meaning of Section 290 . 210(1), RSMo 1969, and was therefore not subject to the prevailing wages on public works law . A copy of that opinion is enclosed. CONCLUSION Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the term "public works" as used in Section 290.210(7), RSMo 1969, of the prevailing wages law means struct ural works having a permanent character and usefulness, such as roads , buildings, bridges, and dams. The term "maintenance work," Section 290.210(4), RSMo 1969, - 6- Honorable Richard M. Marshall means the repair or restoration of that portion of an exi sting facility which has fallen into a state of deterioration or decay to its original condition. "Maintenance work" does not include "major" repairs or "replacement;" the latter constitute "con- struction." "Replacement" entails the complete substitution of an existing facility with a new or different facility. Install- ing a central air conditioning unit in a public building consti- tutes 11construct1on" within the meaning of Section 290. 210(1), RSMo 1969, if the building was formerly without such a unit. Substituting a new central air conditioning unit or furnace in a public building in place of a deteriorated or worn out unit or furnace also constitutes "construction." However, replacing a worn out part of a central air conditioning unit or furnace in order to restore the unit or furnace to operational condition constitutes "maintenance work" within the meaning of Section 290. 210(4), RSMo 1969 . Installing new or different partitions in a public building, either at the location of former partitions or at a different location, and rearranging present partitions con~tutes "constru- ction," Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969. However, restoring an existing partition to sound condition by repairing the deteriorated portion constitutes "maintenance work," Section 290.210(4) , RSMo 1969. Tarring a roof of a public building constitutes "maintenance work," Section 290 . 210(~), RSMo 1969, if the roof is in a state of disrepair or deterioration, otherwise it would be "construction," Section 290 .210(1), RSMo 1969. Putting an entirely new roof on a public building constitutes "construction," Section 290.210(1), RSMo 1969 . Installing new garage doors on a public buil ding con- stitutes "construction," Section 290 . 210(1), RSMo 1969. Seal coating small.cracks in the surface of an asphalt highway constitutes "maintenance work , " Section 290.210(~), RSMo 1969. The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my Assistant, B. J . Jones. Enclosures: Op . No. 351 8- 3-70, Vogelsmeier Op . No . 56 ~ - 18-68 , Walsh -7- JOHN C. DANFORTH Attorney General