No. 8-63
Regular jurors who are required to and who actually travel each day for which such mileage is claimed from their place of residence to the courthouse are entitled to mileage as well as per diem for each day of service as such jurors.
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 8-63
-JURORS :
JURY FEES:
MILEAGE:
Regular jurors who are required to and who actually
travel each day for which such mileage is claimed
from their place of residence to the courthouse are
entitled to mileage as well as per diem for each day
of service as such jurors.
January 4, 1963
Mr. Robert Devoy
Prosecuting Attorney
Linn County
Brookfield, Missouri
Dear Mr. Devoy a
Reference is made to your request for an official
opinion of this off i ce, which reads as follows:
"As Prosecuting Attorney in and for
Linn County, Missouri, I wish to re-
quest the Attorney General's opinion
construing Section 494.100, Missouri
Revised Statutes, 1959.
"The question has arisen as to whether
the Circuit Clerk is authorized to
pay members of the regular petit Jury
panel mileage in travelling from the
Juror's place of residence to the
courthouse and return for each day
that a trial may last."
Section 494.100 RSMo 1959 states as follows:
"Each grand and petit juror on the
regular panel shall receive 81x
dollars per day, for every- day he
may actually serve as such, and
seven cents tor every mile he may
necessarily travel going from his
place of residence to the courthouse
and retuming to the same, to be
paid out of the county treasury."
The foregoing statute fixes the compensation of regular
jurors at a fixed rate per day, plus mileage. Mileage is
Kr. Robert Devoy
paid onl7 ror the number ot ailea •neceaaar117 traveled. "
The word "neoea.ar117
11 1n thia context haa rete.-.nce to the
number ot milea 1t 1a neoeaaar.r to travel b7 the aoat
practicable and uB\I&llJ' traveled route. hrf®on c. llcDar1a
L'UIIber co. v. John n.ecte • co., 130 JIO.App.
, 109 ft 850.
Ia ao Uiidera£o6d, however, i11eage conat1 tutea a portion ot
the JUror•• COIIPenaat1on.
It ta a taa111ar rule or etatutol'J' ccmatruot1on that all
wor4a 1n a atatute be pven efteot, Where poaa1ble, 1n order
to ef'teotuate the lq1alat1Ye inten', 'lbe lan&UAP ot section
~.100 n1denoea the lepalat1ve tnt.nt to oa.penaate reiUlar
3\ll'on tar eYelT 4&7 thQ' "aot\lallJ' Ml"fe •• INoh." Por eaoh
web d&T, a Juror La to nce1n cQ~~~PeU&t1on at the t1Xecl rate
ot atx dollar• pel' da7 an4 111leap. !be atatute p1&1nl7 pro-
vide a that botb el..ata ot the Juror' • c<JIII)ena&t1on aball be
pa14 "tor eve17 clal' he IIQ' aotuall7 Hl"fe u
ncb." 'lbeae
WOI'da ~1aarl7 ~lJ to 1111-.p aa wll •• to Jft' 41•. otb.ar-
w1M, the wordl per daJ'" WO\Ild MI'Ye no purpoH and would
oonat1tute .urplu .....
COJICLUIIOJ.
It la our opinion that r.-eplar Jurors Wbo are required
to and who aotlaall7 travel each da7 tor whi.ch auch ld.leage 1a
olaiMd tr<a their place of residence to the courthouae are
entitled to lllleaae u well •• per 41• tor eaoh daT of Hrv1oe
aa auch Jurora.
!he toreaoina opinion. Wbich I hereb7 appl'OV'e, we prepared
b7 ., Aaa1atant, Joaeph leaaenteld.
ft(WAS .. • UALft'mJ
Attorna~ General