No. 30-71
Opinion letter to Mr. Joseph Jaeger, Jr.
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 30-71
October 6, 1971
Mr. Joseph Jaeger, Jr .
Director of Parks
Missouri State Park Board
1204 Jefferson Building
Jefferson City, Missouri
65101
Dear Mr. Jaeger:
OPINION LETTER NO. 30
Answer by letter-Wood
FILE D
$0
This is in response to your request for my formal opinion on
whether or not the Missouri State Park Board would be obligated to
honor a tee contract entered into between the former trustees or
the Jacob L. Babler Perpetual Endowment Trust Pund and Mr. W.
Kendall Baker, Attorney at Law, of Houston, Texas.
The subject of
the contract was representation or the trust fund 1n settlement
negotiations with the Mexican Government arising out or the expro-
priation in 1938 by the Mexican Government of certain interests in
Mexican oil leases held by Jacob L. Babler.
We understand that
the trustees agreed to compensate Mr. Baker on the basis of thirty
percent of any sum realized out of these negotiations with the
Mexican Government.
Jacob L. Babler established the Perpetual Endowment Trust
Pund through an instrument dated May 28, 1937 and recorded on
June 24, 1937 at Book 1438, page 572 with the St. Louis County re-
corder or deeds.
The assets or the tund were to be any and all
income realized from the Mexican oil leases, and were to be de-
voted to the operation, maintenance and development of the Dr.
Edmund A. Babler Memorial State Park.
The trustees were given
the option, in the event of insufficiency of the income of the
fund for the stated purposes , of terminating the trust and relin-
quishing their rights and powers thereunder to t he State or Missouri.
Jacob Babler's will , executed on July 17, 1942, and duly ad-
mitted for probate after his death on May 31, 1945 , established a
Testamentary Trust for the benefit of the Babler Memorial State Park.
Mr. Joseph Jaeger, Jr.
This Testamentary Trust was composed of the residue or his estate
and had a duration of twenty years from the date or his death.
The
Testamentary Trust and the Perpetual Endowment Trust, though having
a common purpose, were separately administered and separately funded.
Because of the governmental expropriation or Jacob Babler's interest
in the Mexican lands, the Perpetual Endowment trustees were solely
dependent upon the assets of the Testamentary Trust for development
and operation of the Park (see diesenting opinion in Mercantile Trust
Company National Ass'n v. Jaeger, 457 S.W.2d 727, 740-741 (Mo. bane
1970)) .
We understand that the Perpetual Endowment trustees, upon
termination of the Testamentary Trust and distribution of its assets
to the State of Missouri in 1965 as provided in the will, have since
that time entirely surrendered their management or the Park to the
Missouri State Park Board.
We accordingly believe that the Perpetual
Endowment Trust has been effectually terminated and that the Missouri
State Park Board has succeeded to all rights and obligation formerly
held by said Trust.
A contingent fee contract for legal services may be canceled
before the contingency occurs subject to payment of a reasonable
attorney's fee for services already performed.
"There can be no doubt or the right of a client
to discharge his lawyer, whether he be employed
on a quantum meruit basis or for a contingent
fee.
In such event, if the lawyer has a con-
tingent contract and is without fault, he has
the election to claim a reasonable fee for the
work done, as upon a mutual rescission, or to
wait until the claim is liquidated by judgment
or settlement and then sue (if necessary) for
his contract fee •••• " (In re Downs, 363
S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. bane 1963)
The Attorney General has the statutory responsibility or pro-
viding legal advice and representation to the State Park Board (Sec-
tions 27.040 and 27.060, RSMo 1969).
This responsibility is general
and unlimited; and therefore, we are of the opinion that this office
should decide whether the instant contract for legal services "in-
herited" by the Park Board should be ratified or canceled.
We be-
lieve it would be in the State's best interest not to disturb the
present arrangement with Mr. Baker.
Yours very truly,
JOHN C. DAN~ORTH
Attorney General
-2-