No. 29-76
Opinion letter to Mr. Lawrence L. Graham
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 29-76
June 18, 1976
Mr. Lawrence L. Graham
Director, Department of
Social Services
Broadway State Office Building
Jefferson City, Missouri
65101
Dear Mr. Graham:
OPINION LETTER NO . 29
Answer by Letter - K1affenbach
Fl LED
:29
This opinion letter is in response to your question asking
as follows :
nAre the employees of the Board of Probation
and Parole, including the Board Members, and
the Division of Youth Services covered by the
Section 105.710 RSt-to., since the implementa-
tion of the Omnibus State Reorganization Act
of 1974?"
You further state :
"Prior to reorganization the Board of Proba-
tion and Parole and Division of Youth Ser-
vices were under Missouri statutes, sections
of the Department of Corrections, although
autonomous.
such Department no longer exists ,
and the Board of Probation and Parole is now
a division of the Department of Social Ser-
vices.
Section 105.710 RSMo . lists among
others covered by that Section as ' ••• employ-
ees and agents of the department of correc-
tions .• • '. Prior to reorganization this did
include all employees of the Board of Pro-
bation and Parole, Division of Probation and
Parole, and the Division of Youth Services.n
Mr. Lawrence L. Graham
Section 105.710, House Bill 1734, 78th General Assembly,
does not refer to employees and agents of the Department of
Corrections but refers to employees and agents of the Division
of Corrections.
Prior to the enactment of the Omnibus State Reorganization
Act, Senate Bill No. 1 of the 77th General Assembly, First Extra-
ordinary Session, the Board of Probation and Parole, the Division
of Probation and Parole and the Division of Training Schools were
divisions of the Department of Corrections.
Section 549.300,
RSMo; Section 216.010 , RSMo; Section 219.030, RSMo.
The Reorgan-
ization Act transferred the Board of Probation and Parole to the
Department of Social Services under a type II transfer and also the
powers, duties and functions of the State Board of Training
Schools to the Division of Youth Services, Department of Social
Services under a type I transfer.
See subsections 16 and 17,
Section 13 of the Reorganization Act .
Under subsection 15 of
Section 13 the powers, duties and functions of the Department
of Corrections were transferred by type II transfer to the
Department of Social Services and a Division of Corrections was
established.
Further, we understand that the provisions of the
Department of Social Services Reorganization Plan of 1974 placed
the personnel of the Division of Probation and Parole under the
Board of Probation and Parole.
However, it is our view that the type of transfer in this
pa.rticular case is not significant.
That is, the Tort Defense
Fund, Section 105.710 was amended in 1974 (House Bill 1734, 78th
General Assembly) and it is obvious from the changes which were
made that numerous amendments to the Tort Defense Fund Act were
made to take into consideration that the executive departments
of government had been reorganized.
That is , for example, the
amendments to Section 105.710 included the director of the
Department of Social Services as well as the director of the
Division of Corrections, the director of the Division of Family
Services, the director of the Department of Mental Health, and
made other changes which indicated an awareness that the amend-
ments to Section 105.710 were intended to reflect the changes
brought about by reorganization.
However, it is significant
that the Board of Probation and Parole and the Division of
Probation and Parole were not included within the amended
coverage of such section and that the Division of Youth Services
was not included within the amended coverage of such section.
As we have indicated, the director of the Department of
Social Services is expressly covered by the Tort Defense Fund
as amended.
However, the employees of the Department, as such,
are not covered.
-
2 -
Mr. Lawrence L. Graham
It is therefore our view that the Board of Probation and
Parole, the Division of Probation and Parole, and the Division
of Youth Services are not covered under the provisions of
Section 105.710 as amended by the laws of 1974.
Very truly yours,
JOI-IN C. DANFORTH
Attorney General
-
3 -