No. 22-77
Opinion letter to Mr. . Kenneth Carnes
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 22-77
JOHN ASHCROFT
ATTORNEY GENERAL
January 21, 1977
OPINION LETTER NO. 22
Mr. Wm. Kenneth Carnes, Director
Department of Public Safety
P. 0. Box 749
Jefferson City, Missouri
65101
Dear Mr. Carnes:
This is in response to the request by your predecessor for
an opinion of this office on the following question:
"Whether the Adjutant General may reimburse
the 11nited States Government for the value
of , litary property, lost damaged or de-
str•
:d, from appropriated funds (MO) avail-
able to the Adjutant General, or whether
sucl1 reimbursement requires a specific ap-
propriation by the General Assembly?"
The answer to your question necessitates, as a preliminary
matter, an analysis of the legal relationship which exists be-
tween the United States Government and the Adjutant General of
Missouri with respect to the military property issued to the
Missouri National Guard.
We assume that any military property
to which you refer is property contemplated by 32 U.S.C. § 710
and National Guard Regulation 735-11, paragraph 1-11.
We fur-
thermore assume that the Adjutant General of Missouri has ac-
knowledged receipt of all military property issued to the Mis-
souri National Guard by the United States Government pursuant
(314) 751·3321
to the provisions in Title 32 of the United States Code which
provides the conditions upon which the property is issued.
Therefore, we assume that the Missouri National Guard, through
the Adjutant General of Missouri, has received the property with
the knowledge of the conditions upon which it was issued and
thus is contractually bound with the United States Government
Mr. Wm. Kenneth Carnes
to account for that property pursuant to 32 U.S.C. § 710 and
National Guard Regulation 735-11.
The law in this state has recognized the principle that
when a state enters into a validly authorized contract it binds
itself to the performance of that contract just as any private
citizen would do by so contracting and cannot invoke any privi-
lege of sovereign immunity.
V. S. DiCarlo Construction Company,
Incorporated v. State, 485 S.W.2d 52 (Mo. 1972).
See also Sec-
tion 490.460, RSMo 1969.
We believe, therefore, that the Mis-
souri National Guard cannot be excused from the performance of
any contractual obligations it has assumed simply because it is
an arm of the state government.
Accordingly, unless the state
of Missouri can assert a valid defense under the law of con-
tracts, it is bound to reimburse the United States Government
for the value of military property under the terms and condi-
tions upon which the property was received and acknowledged by
the Adjutant General.
Your specific question dealing with the specificity of ap-
propriations from which funds may be spent to reimburse the
United States Government for this lost, damaged, or destroyed
military property requires an analysis of the specific appro-
priations for the fiscal year for which such payments are to be
made.
In this regard, it is clear that every appropriation must
specify distinctly the purpose for which moneys are to expended.
State ex inf. Danforth v. Merrell, 530 S.W.2d 209 (Mo.Banc 1975).
The Missouri General Assembly has a duty to fix the purpose for
each appropriation and moneys cannot be paid out except as for
the purpose fixed.
Article IV, Sections 23 and 28, Constitution
of Missouri; Nacy v. LePage, 111 S.W.2d 25, 26 (Mo. 1937);
State ex rel. Cason v. Bond, 495 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.Banc 1973).
We believe that an appropriation to reimburse the United
States Government for the val\-].e of military property lost, dam-
aged, or destroyed must be specific to the extent that there is
a clear legislative intent seen in the appropriation legislation
which identifies the appropriated funds for the purpose of reim-
bursement to the United States Government for such property.
It is our view that the Adjutant General may reimburse the
United States Government for the value of military property re-
ceived by the state of Missouri under 32 U.S.C. § 710 and which
is lost, damaged, or destroyed if there is an appropriation
which provides for payment to the federal goverment for military
property lost, damaged, or destroyed.
-2-
Yours very truly,
/"."""
~~~~- ~~~·{A_c,Po~r-:sft
t)
ASHCROFT
Attorney General