No. 37-78
Opinion letter to Mrs. Carolyn Ashford
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 37-78
~~~~iuoa?W
JOHN ASHCROFT
JEFFERSON CITY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
65101
January 10, 1978
OPINION LETTER NO.
37
Mrs. Carolyn Ashford, Director
Department of Natural Resources
1014 Madison Street
Jefferson City, Missouri
65101
Dear Mrs. Ashford:
This is in response to your question:
"Does the Missouri Air Conservation Commis-
sion have the authority under Chapter 203,
RSMo, to compel air contaminant sources to
disclose to the agency the types of informa-
tion referred to in the attached letter from
the Regional Administrator of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency?
Specifically,
can the agency compel a source to disclose
process descriptions and production data for
operations which result in the emission or
potential emission of air contaminants, and
can the agency compel a source which is burn-
ing natural gas to disclose gas shortage pro-
jections, alternate fuel needs, expected in-
creases in air contaminant emissions from
alternate fuels, and the other information
referred to on page one of the EPA letter?"
(314) 751-3321
The EPA letter which you reference informs the state agency
that certain information developed by the Federal Energy Admini-
stration with respect to the natural gas supply situation, can be
made available to the state agency only if the conditions of 40
C.F .R. §2 ._301 (h) (3), relating to the disclosure of confidential
business information, are met.
The same stipulation applies to
the disclosure to the state of process descriptions and production
data acquired by EPA personnel during inspections of air contaminant
sources.
Mrs. Carolyn Ashford
40 C.F.R. §2.30l(h) (3)
business information can be
of two conditions are met.
condition, which is:
provides that so-called confidential
disclosed to the states only if one
Your question goes to the first
"The agency has first furnished to the EPA
office having custody of the information
a written opinion from the agency's chief
legal officer or counsel stating that un-
der applicable state or local law the
agency has the authority to compel a bus-
iness which possess such information to
disclose it to the agency, ..• " 40 C.F.R.
§ 2 . 3 01 (h) ( 3) ( i) •
The resolution of your question will necessarily provide the opinion
called for in the federal regulation.
Section 203.050.1, RSMo Supp. 1975, provides that the Air
Conservation Commission has the following powers, inter alia:
"(3) (a) To require persons engaged in
operations which result in air pollution
to file reports containing information re-
lating to rate, period of emission and com-
position of effluent;
*
*
*
"(8) Develop such facts and make such
investigations as are consistent with the
purposes of sections 203.020, 203.040 to
203.100, 203.120, 203.140 to 203.170 and
203.190 and 203.195, and, in connection
'therewith, to enter or authorize any rep-
resentative of the commission to enter at
all reasonable times and upon reasonable
notice in or upon any private or public
property for the purpose of inspecting or
investigating any condition which the
commission or executive secretary shall
have probable cause to believe to be an
air contaminant source •.• "
The quoted passages from Section 203.050.1 appear to be a broad
grant of authority to acquire facts relevant to the prevention,
abatement and control of air pollution, the stated goal of the
Air Conservation Law.
Section 203.030, RSMo 1969.
Moreover,
the authority expressly conferred by Section 203.050.1 is enhanced
by the doctrine of implied powers.
An administrative agency not
only has those powers expressly granted, but also by implication,
-2-
Mrs. Carolyn Ashford
such additional powers as are necessary for the due and efficient
exercise of the powers expressly granted, or as may be fairly
implied from the statute granting the express powers.
State
on inf. McKittrick v. Wymore, 132 S.W.2d 979 (Mo. Bane 1939).
A statutory grant of power carries with it, by implication, every-
thing necessary to carry out the power and make it effectual and
complete.
Id.
With respect to the first category of information mentioned
in your question, process descriptions and production data, it is
our opinion that the Air Conservation Commission can compel air
contaminant sources to disclose such information.
The specific
grant of authority in Section 203.050.1(3) (a) refers to reports
relating to
Ji ::..:.:. ::.2 1
peri.oi...L o.E SII"i._Lssicrl a.nt..J. COfi.lpOs.i tior1 oi CiilU.Cl1 c.~ n
However, it is obvious that such authority would be less effective
if the agency could not check the accuracy of the information
relating to rate, period and composition of emissions by reference
to the production method and related data.
We are also aware that
the rate, period and composition of some air pollution emissions
cannot be readily determined except by calculations based on
production methods, rates and raw materials.
Therefore, in order
to carry out the statutory mandate to prevent, abate and control
air pollution, the power to require submission of process des-
criptions and production data by air contaminant sources is neces-
sarily implied from the power to require submission of information
relating to rate, period and composition of emissions.
Moreover, the agency can require some information respecting
process descriptions and production data in another way, irrespective
of the desire of the source to disclose such information.
Accord-
ing to the EPA letter, the subject information is being obtained
by EPA personnel as they inspect air contaminant sources.
Repre-
sentatives of the Air Conservation Commission also have the power
to inspect sources, and, if necessary, to obtain search warrants
in aid thereof.
Section 203.050.1(8).
Thus, the agency inspectors
can, for all practical purposes, compel the source to disclose such
information by compelling the source to submit to the inspection.
With respect to the second category of information referenced
in your question, data relating to the current natural gas shortage
and its effect on air contaminant emissions, we are also of the
opinion that the Air Conservation Commission can compel disclosure
of such information by the affected sources.
Disclosure of data
relative to increased emissions of air contaminants, due to fuel
switching, can obviously be compelled under the express authority
to require disclosure of rate, period and composition of the
effluents.
Section 203.050.1(3) (a).
Plant by plant projection of
gas shortages and alternate fuel needs is the sort of ancillary
information which the agency necessarily must have in order to
make the emission increase data meaningful.
Thus, the agency,
by necessary implication, has the authority to compel the disclosure
of such information.
-3-
Mrs. Carolyn Ashford
The other information referred to in the EPA letter are such
things as number and type of combustors at each plant, the firing
rate of such combustors, the name and address of the source and
its parent company, SIC (Standard Industrial Classification)
Codes, and Federal Energy Administration identification numbers.
This data appears to be the sort of information the agency would
require in order to double-check the accuracy of emission data
submitted by the source.
Thus, such information would be necessary
to the effective administration of the regulatory program.
The
Air Conservation Commission has the implied power to compel dis-
closure of such information, in order to carry out the powers
expressly granted to the agency by the legislature.
Very truly yours,
~&-e--
JOHN ASHCROFT
Attorney General
-4-