No. 37-78

Opinion letter to Mrs. Carolyn Ashford

Year: 1978Length: 1,191 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 37-78

~~~~iuoa?W JOHN ASHCROFT JEFFERSON CITY ATTORNEY GENERAL 65101 January 10, 1978 OPINION LETTER NO. 37 Mrs. Carolyn Ashford, Director Department of Natural Resources 1014 Madison Street Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Dear Mrs. Ashford: This is in response to your question: "Does the Missouri Air Conservation Commis- sion have the authority under Chapter 203, RSMo, to compel air contaminant sources to disclose to the agency the types of informa- tion referred to in the attached letter from the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency? Specifically, can the agency compel a source to disclose process descriptions and production data for operations which result in the emission or potential emission of air contaminants, and can the agency compel a source which is burn- ing natural gas to disclose gas shortage pro- jections, alternate fuel needs, expected in- creases in air contaminant emissions from alternate fuels, and the other information referred to on page one of the EPA letter?" (314) 751-3321 The EPA letter which you reference informs the state agency that certain information developed by the Federal Energy Admini- stration with respect to the natural gas supply situation, can be made available to the state agency only if the conditions of 40 C.F .R. §2 ._301 (h) (3), relating to the disclosure of confidential business information, are met. The same stipulation applies to the disclosure to the state of process descriptions and production data acquired by EPA personnel during inspections of air contaminant sources. Mrs. Carolyn Ashford 40 C.F.R. §2.30l(h) (3) business information can be of two conditions are met. condition, which is: provides that so-called confidential disclosed to the states only if one Your question goes to the first "The agency has first furnished to the EPA office having custody of the information a written opinion from the agency's chief legal officer or counsel stating that un- der applicable state or local law the agency has the authority to compel a bus- iness which possess such information to disclose it to the agency, ..• " 40 C.F.R. § 2 . 3 01 (h) ( 3) ( i) • The resolution of your question will necessarily provide the opinion called for in the federal regulation. Section 203.050.1, RSMo Supp. 1975, provides that the Air Conservation Commission has the following powers, inter alia: "(3) (a) To require persons engaged in operations which result in air pollution to file reports containing information re- lating to rate, period of emission and com- position of effluent; * * * "(8) Develop such facts and make such investigations as are consistent with the purposes of sections 203.020, 203.040 to 203.100, 203.120, 203.140 to 203.170 and 203.190 and 203.195, and, in connection 'therewith, to enter or authorize any rep- resentative of the commission to enter at all reasonable times and upon reasonable notice in or upon any private or public property for the purpose of inspecting or investigating any condition which the commission or executive secretary shall have probable cause to believe to be an air contaminant source •.• " The quoted passages from Section 203.050.1 appear to be a broad grant of authority to acquire facts relevant to the prevention, abatement and control of air pollution, the stated goal of the Air Conservation Law. Section 203.030, RSMo 1969. Moreover, the authority expressly conferred by Section 203.050.1 is enhanced by the doctrine of implied powers. An administrative agency not only has those powers expressly granted, but also by implication, -2- Mrs. Carolyn Ashford such additional powers as are necessary for the due and efficient exercise of the powers expressly granted, or as may be fairly implied from the statute granting the express powers. State on inf. McKittrick v. Wymore, 132 S.W.2d 979 (Mo. Bane 1939). A statutory grant of power carries with it, by implication, every- thing necessary to carry out the power and make it effectual and complete. Id. With respect to the first category of information mentioned in your question, process descriptions and production data, it is our opinion that the Air Conservation Commission can compel air contaminant sources to disclose such information. The specific grant of authority in Section 203.050.1(3) (a) refers to reports relating to Ji ::..:.:. ::.2 1 peri.oi...L o.E SII"i._Lssicrl a.nt..J. COfi.lpOs.i tior1 oi CiilU.Cl1 c.~ n However, it is obvious that such authority would be less effective if the agency could not check the accuracy of the information relating to rate, period and composition of emissions by reference to the production method and related data. We are also aware that the rate, period and composition of some air pollution emissions cannot be readily determined except by calculations based on production methods, rates and raw materials. Therefore, in order to carry out the statutory mandate to prevent, abate and control air pollution, the power to require submission of process des- criptions and production data by air contaminant sources is neces- sarily implied from the power to require submission of information relating to rate, period and composition of emissions. Moreover, the agency can require some information respecting process descriptions and production data in another way, irrespective of the desire of the source to disclose such information. Accord- ing to the EPA letter, the subject information is being obtained by EPA personnel as they inspect air contaminant sources. Repre- sentatives of the Air Conservation Commission also have the power to inspect sources, and, if necessary, to obtain search warrants in aid thereof. Section 203.050.1(8). Thus, the agency inspectors can, for all practical purposes, compel the source to disclose such information by compelling the source to submit to the inspection. With respect to the second category of information referenced in your question, data relating to the current natural gas shortage and its effect on air contaminant emissions, we are also of the opinion that the Air Conservation Commission can compel disclosure of such information by the affected sources. Disclosure of data relative to increased emissions of air contaminants, due to fuel switching, can obviously be compelled under the express authority to require disclosure of rate, period and composition of the effluents. Section 203.050.1(3) (a). Plant by plant projection of gas shortages and alternate fuel needs is the sort of ancillary information which the agency necessarily must have in order to make the emission increase data meaningful. Thus, the agency, by necessary implication, has the authority to compel the disclosure of such information. -3- Mrs. Carolyn Ashford The other information referred to in the EPA letter are such things as number and type of combustors at each plant, the firing rate of such combustors, the name and address of the source and its parent company, SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Codes, and Federal Energy Administration identification numbers. This data appears to be the sort of information the agency would require in order to double-check the accuracy of emission data submitted by the source. Thus, such information would be necessary to the effective administration of the regulatory program. The Air Conservation Commission has the implied power to compel dis- closure of such information, in order to carry out the powers expressly granted to the agency by the legislature. Very truly yours, ~&-e-- JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General -4-
No. 37-78: Opinion letter to Mrs. Carolyn Ashford | Justis AI