No. 22-80
Opinion Letter to The Honorable Carl Muckler
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 22-80
July 24, 1980
The Honorable Carl Muckler
Representative, District 56
Room 109C , Capitol Buil ding
Jefferson City , Missouri
65101
Dear Mr . Muckler:
OPINION LETTER NO . 2~
(Answer by Letter-Allen)
F r LED
:<2
This letter is in response to your request for an opinion
asking whether Chapter 34, the state purchasing law , requires
that professional services contracts be bid through the corn-
missioner of administration.
In our Opinion No . 163 , dated August 22, 1975 , to Nielsen,
we concluded that the phrase "contractual services " as used
in § 34.010 , RSMo, includes insurance purchased by the state
and therefor e that such insurance must be purchased pursuant
to the provisions of Chapter 34 , except as otherwise provided
by law.
We enclose a copy of that opinion.
It is our understanding that Opinion No. 163- 1975 may
have been misunderstood to apply to physicians, attorneys and
expert witnesses who are part of an attorney ' s case .
At the time of the enactment of the purchasing law in 1933
the practice of medicine and the practice of law were considered
the historical learned professions and were not subject to bid .
It seems clear that the legislature in enacting such law did not
intend to include these historic l earned professions.
While
such professional services are now bid in a number of contexts
there has been no change in the statutes since they were first
enacted to indicate that such professional services are to be
included within the requirements of the purchasing law.
Accord-
ingly, we conclude that such services are not subject to the
requirements that they be bid under the purchasing law.
The Honorabl e Carl Muckler
The expert witness services to which we refer are of a
particularly unique character because such expert witnesses are a
part of an attorney ' s case for which the attorney bears the
professional responsibility .
As a consequence , it is our view
that the services of such expert witnesses were not and are not
now subject to the requirements of the purchasing law .
It is our view that professions and services other than
those of physicians , attorneys and such expert witnesses are
subject to the requirements of the purchasing law.
Although we have concluded that services of physicians ,
attorneys and such expert witnesses are not included within the
provisions of the purchasing law , Chapter 34 , we wish to make it
clear that there is nothing to prohibit the bidding for such
services if the officer requi ring the service desires such bids.
Very truly yours ,
Enclosure
Att ' y Gen . Op . 163- 1975
-
2 -