No. 8-84
Opinion letter to The Honorable John A. Birch
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 8-84
.JOHN ASHCROFT
ATTORNEY GENERAL
~~~¥~
POST OFFICE BOX 899
.JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI 65102
April 12, 1984
OPINION LETTER NO. 8-84
The Honorable John A. Birch
Representative, District 31
10106 Northwest 72nd Street
Weatherby Lake, Missouri
64152
Dear Representative Birch:
This opinion is in response to your question asking:
1.
Does Opinion letter No. 99, dated March
17, 1981, apply to second class counties?
2.
Section 137.560, RSMo 1978, provides that
funds
provided
for in Section 137.555
(the one-fifth by the county from spe-
cials) shall be shown as a separate item
on all of the financial, budget and other
accounting
statements
of
the
county.
Does depositing such funds in the county
road district account and showing as a
line item receipt source comply with this
requirement?
(314) 751-3321
We assume for purposes of this
op~n~on that the exceptions
for certain second
cla~j counties contained in Sections 13 7. 554
and 137.556, RSMo 1978,_
do not apply to your first question.
Opinion Letter No. 99, referred to in your first question,
concluded that the special road and bridge tax, imposed by Section
137.555 and Article X, Section 12(a), Missouri Constitution, is to
be paid into the special road and bridge fund in the county trea-
sury, to be used for road and bridge purposes and no other pur-
poses whatever.
The statute also contains a provision regarding
the portion of the road and bridge tax which is collected and paid
All statutory references are to RSMo 1978, unless otherwise
indicated.
1.
,~
The Honorable John A. Birch
upon any property lying and being within any special road dis-
trict.
Four-fifths of the money collected and paid upon this
property is to be disbursed to the credit of the special road
district from which it arose and is payable to such special road
district upon warrants of the county court in favor of the commis-
sioners or treasurer of such special road district; the other
one-fifth of these funds is to be retained in the Special Road and
Bridge Fund to be used, in the discretion of the county court, for
improving or repairing any street in any incorporated city or
village in the county, provided said street forms
a part of a
continuous highway of said county leading through such city or
village.
In construing this statute, the 1981 opinion letter went on
to conclude that the county court in such a case has no authority
to give the one-fifth portion mentioned above to the special road
district for use for either roads or bridges, because the General
Assembly has provided for the exact use of the funds and has not
authorized the county court to do otherwise with the remaining
one-fifth portion.
Opinion No. 99 is consistent with the Dillon rule, as stated
in Lancaster v. County of Atchison, 352 No. 1039, 180 S. "1-l. 2d 706,
708 (bane 1944) (quoting, Dillon on Municipal Corporations Section
89 (3d ed.)):
[C]ounties
like
other
public
corporations,
"can exercise
the
following
powers
and
no
others:
(1) those granted in express '"orcls;
(2) those necessarily or fairly implied in or
incident to the powers expressly granted; (3)
those essential to the declared objects and
purpose of the corporation- -not simply con-
venient, but indispensable.
Any fair, reason-
able doubt concerning the existence of power
is resolved by the courts against the corpora-
tion and the pm,ver is denied."
Under the Dillon rule, before a second class county may give
its funds to a special road <'listrict, a stA.tute must exist that
expressly or impliedly gives the county this power.
(VIe do not
believe the po,Jer to give funds to a road district is an essential
or inherent power, absent any unusual circumstances.)
The General
Assembly has given counties the authority to grant their funds to
certain fire protection districts and public library districts.
Section 6 7. 250.
The General Assembly has given counties no such
power to counties with regard to road districts.
Cf.
Sections
137.554 and 137.556 (authorizing second class counties to expend
certain road
and bridge taxes in certain cities,
towns,
and
villages).
In
fact,
Section 50.550 prohibits
counties
from
'-2-
,,
The Honorable John A. Birch
expending funds
on bridges located in special road districts.
Opinion No.
36, Parish,
1968.
Accordingly,
we
conclude that
second class counties may not grant to special road districts the
one-fifth portion of road and bridge taxes derived
from such
special road districts for use on either roads or bridges.
The second question asked deals with Section 13 7. 560, which
states:
The funds provided for in section 137.555
shall be shov.m as a separate item on all of
the financial,
budget
and other accounting
statements of the county, and such fund shall
be
specifically
and
expressly
shown
and
designated on all such as the special road and
bridge fund of such county.
He
assume
for purposes
of this
opinion letter that the
"county road district account" referred to in your second question
is
the Special Road
and
Bridge
Fund
referred to
in Section
137.560.
\tJe
conclude that the one-fifth portion of road and
bridge taxes derived from special road districts does not have to
be accounted for as a "line-item receipt source".
Rather, Section
13 7. 555 provides that all of the road and bridge tax money is to
be deposited in the Special Road and Bridge Fund.
The four..;fifths
portion of the road and bridge taxes derived from property lying
in a special road district is then disbursed to the appropriate
special road district, v.Jhen supported by the proper documentation,
e.g. , a warrant, shO'I,v-ing, inter alia, how the four- fifths portion
is computed.
Under the accounting method described above, the
one-fifth portion of the road and bridge taxes derived from the
property in a special· road district is not accounted for separate-
ly as a line item receipt apart from the other moneys in the
Special Road and Bridge Fund.
This above-described accounting
method complies with Sections 13 7. 555 and 13 7. 560 and does not
account for the one-fifth portion as a line-item receipt.
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT
Attorney General
I ,..··-3-