No. 2-85

Opinion letter to Mary-Jean Hackwood

Year: 1985Length: 1,304 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2-85

WILLIAM L. WEBSTER ATTORNEY GENERAL ~!}~~~ POST OFFICE BOX 899 .JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI 65102 February 1, 1985 (314) 751-3321 DIRECT DIAL: OPINION LETTER NO. 2-85 Mary-Jean Hackwood Executive Secretary Missouri State Employees' 900 Leslie Boulevard Jefferson City, Missouri Dear Ms. Hackwood: Retirement System 65101 ... .-., ~: r I' This opinion letter is in response to your questions asking: Does the benefit increase from 1 1/4% to 1 1/3% apply to the initial retirement benefit of re- tirees or is it to include any cost of living increases that have been received by the retirees? If your determination is that the increase is to be applied to the initial benefit amount, rather than the amount currently being received by a retiree, should the cost of living increase by Section[sJ 104.415 and 104.612 be recalculated retroactively on the initial benefit payment and brought up to date or should the cost of living increases accrued to date be paid until such time the next cost of living adjustment is made? Section 104.612.1 and .2, RSMo Supp. 1984, states: 1. Each special consultant employed or eligible for emplo~nent on May 12, 1981, by a board of trustees of a retirement system as provided in section 104.610 shall, in addition to duties prescribed in section 104.610, and upon request of the board of trustees, give the board, orally or in writing, a short detailed Mary-Jean Backwood statement on the problems of retirement under the current monthly benefits. 2. As compensation for the extra duty im- posed by subsection 1 of this section, each special consultant shall receive, in addition to all other compensation provided by law, an increase in compensation each year, computed upon the total amount which the consultant re- ceived in the previous year from state retire- ment benefits, compensation under the provisions of section 104.610, and compensation under the provisions of this section, of eighty percent of the increase in the consumer price index calcu- lated in the manner specified in section 104.415. Any such annual increase in compensation, how- ever, shall not exceed five percent, nor be less than four percent, and the total increase in compensation to each special consultant pursuant to the provisions of this subsection shall not exceed fifty percent of the total retirement benefits and compensation he or she was receiving immediately prior to May 12, 1981. Section 104.415, RSMo Supp. 1984, states: 1. Each.member who retires on or after May 12, 1981, shall receive each year an in- crease in the amount of benefits received by the member during the preceding year of eighty percent of the increase in the consumer price index calculated in the manner hereinafter pro- vided. Such annual benefit increase, however, shall not exceed five percent, nor be less than four percent, and the total increase in the amount of benefits received pursuant to the provisions of this subsection shall not exceed fifty percent of the initial benefit which the member received upon retirement. 2. For the purposes of this section, any increase in the consumer price index shall be determined by the board in February of each year, based upon the consumer price index for the preceding calendar year over the consumer price index for the calendar year immediately prior thereto. Any increase so determined shall -2- Mary-Jean Backwood be applied by the board in calculating any bene- fit increases that become payable under this section for the twelve-month period beginning with the March first immediately following such determination. 3. An annual increase, if any is due, shall be payable Donthly beginning on a date specified by the board. Nothing in this sec- tion shall be construed to prohibit a member from waiving his right to receive the annual increase provided pursuant to this section. However, the waiver may not extend beyond the age permitted by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA). The waiver shall be final as to the annual increase waived. As can be seen by these statutes, members of the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System ("MOSERS") who retire on or after May 12, 1981, receive a cost of living allowance ("COLA") as a part of their basic retirement benefits. Members of MOSERS who retired prior to May 12, 1981, receive the COLA as a part of their special consultant pay. Both COLAs are calculated in the same manner and are based on the amount received in the previous year from state retirement benefits. Section 104.610.1, RSMo Supp. 1984, states: Any person, who is receiving or hereafter may receive state retirement benefits from the Missouri state employees' retirement system, a legislators' retirement system, or the highway employees' and highway patrol retirement system, upon application to the board of trustees of the system from which he or she is receiving retire- ment benefits, shall be made, constituted, ap- pointed and employed by the board as a special consultant on the problems of retirement, aging, and other state matters, for the remainder of the person's life, and upon request of the board, or other state agencies where such person was employed prior to retirement, give opinions, and be available to give opinions in writing, or orally, in response to such requests, as may be required, and for such services shall be compen- sated monthly, in an amount, which, when added to any monthly state retirement benefits received initially on his retirement, shall be equal to -3- Mary-Jean Hackwood the state retirement benefits the person would be-receiving currently if he had benefited from Changes in the law effecting InCreases in t~ rate in the-r0rillUia for calculating benefi~in his respective retirement system, for his type- of employment, made subsequent to the date of his retirement; except that in calculating such benefits the meaning of "average compensation" shall be that ascribed to it by the law in ef- fect on December 31, 1980. [Emphasis added.] Such section provides retirees with special consultant pay in an amount equal to the state retirement benefits that person would be receiving currently if he or she had benefited from changes in the law effecting increases in the rate in the formula for calcu- lating benefits in his respective retirement system. Section 104.374.1, RSMo Supp. 1984, states: The normal annuity of a member, other than a member of the general assembly or a member who served in an elective state office, shall be an amount equal to one and one-third percent of the average compensation of the member multiplied by the number of years of creditable service of the member. Prior to the enactment of Senate Committee Substitute for House Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1370, 82nd General Assembly, Second Regular Session, the rate used to calculate the deferred normal annuity was one and one-fourth percent rather than one and one-third percent. The calculation of the deferred normal annuity is dependent upon the "rate", the average compensation of the individual, and the number of years of creditable service. We believe that the special consultant compensation under the new version of Section 104.610 is calculated by merely substituting the "old rate" for the new one and one-third percent (l-l/3%) rate introduced by Sec- tion 104.374, RSMo Supp. 1984. One does not multiply the new one and one-third percent (l-l/3%) rate by any amount of accrued cost- of-living benefits. Such cost-of-living benefits are calculated separately under Sections 104.415 and 104.612, RSMo Supp. 1984. Accordingly, we conclude that the rate increase from one and one-fourth percent (l-l/4%) to one and one-third percent (l-l/3%) is applied to the calculation of the special consultant compensa- tion provided by Section 104.610, RSMo Supp. 1984, without regard -4- Mary-Jean Hackwood to cost-of-living benefit adjustments. Cost-of-living benefit adjustments are calculated annually under Sections 104.415 and 104.612, RSMo Supp. 1984. Such cost-of-living benefit adjustments are not calculated retroactively. Very truly yours, ~··~ WILLIAM L. WEBSTER Attorney General -5-
No. 2-85: Opinion letter to Mary-Jean Hackwood | Justis AI