No. 22-85
Opinion letter to Eugene J. Feldhausen
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 22-85
WILLIAM L. WEBSTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
~~~4~
POST OFFICE BOX 899
.JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI 6SI02
February 1, 1985
(314) 751-3321
DIRECT DIAL:
OPINION LETTER NO. 22-85
Eugene J. Feldhausen
Chairman, Missouri Highvvays and
Transportation Commission
Post Office Box 270
Jefferson City, Missouri
65102
Dear Mr. Feldhausen:
This letter is in response to your request for an opinion of
this office asking:
Is the Missouri Highway and Transportation Corn-
mission authorized to enter into an agreement
with St. Louis County to permit the county to
close a portion of State Highway Route 40 in
St. Louis County near the Missouri River and to
construct a temporary levee across the highway
at such time as the Missouri River is forecast
to reach the 100-year flood stage within twenty-
four hours.
By agreement executed on September 7, 1984, the Missouri High-
ways and Transportation Commission and St. Louis County, Missouri,
contracted for the closing of U.S. Highway 40-61 under flood condi-
tions.
In essence, after notice to the Commission of predicted
flooding, St. Louis County will construct a temporary levee across
Highway 40 in accordance with construction plans approved by the
Commission.
The county will be responsible for detour signing and,
after flood waters recede, restoration of the right-of-way to pre-
flood conditions.
All expenses are the responsibility of the county.
The ~1issouri Highways and Transportation Commission is estab-
lished by Article IV, Section 29, Missouri Constitution.
Pursuant
to that provision, the Commission has authority over all state
transportation facilities as provided by law, including bridges and
highways, and has authority to limit access to, from and across
state highways where the public interest and safety may require.
Eugene J. Feldhausen
Article IV, Section 31, Missouri Constitution, states in part:
The commission may enter into contracts with
cities, counties or other political subdivi-
sions for and concerning the maintenance of,
and regulation of traffic on any state highway
within such cities, counties or subdivision.
Under the flooding conditions described in the agreement, High-
way 40 would be impassable whether St. Louis County constructed its
levee or not.
Thus, St. Louis County is not limiting access to,
from or across state highways.
Clearly, the agreement benefits both
the state and the county by protecting the portion of the highway
protected by the levee, by providing for necessary detours, and by
protecting the substantial amount of public and private property
within the levee.
It is, therefore, the opinion of this office that the agreement
is squarely within the constitutional authorization of contracts
"for and concerning the maintenance of, and regulation of traffic"
on Highway 40, a state highway, and is, therefore, a valid agreement
between the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission and St.
Louis County, Missouri.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM L. WEBSTER
Attorney General
-2-