No. 18-86
Opinion letter to The Honorable Mike Lybyer
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 18-86
WILLIAM L. WEBSTER
ATTORNEY OENERAL
....._ '
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
JEFFERSON CITY
65102
March 12 , 1986
P. 0. Box 899
( 314) 7::11· 3321
OPINION LETTER NO. 18-86
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
Senator, District 16
State Capitol Building , Room 333
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Dear Senator Lybyer:
F·llED 1 I
;f !
This opinion is in response to your questions asking:
If vo~ers abolish township form of
government , 'what would the maximum tax rates
be for road and bridge purposes and for
general revenue purposes, furthermore, would
the county need a special election to
establish these tax limits or does the
County Commission set the rates according to
the statutes of Missouri and the Missouri
Constitution?
Because your opinion request is devoid of any specific
facts involving these questions, we will utilize the following
hypothetical:
X County is a third class, township organization
county with less than three hundred million dollars
($300,000,000.00) assessed valuation.
On November 4, 1980, the
date of the Hancock Amendment , Missouri Constitution, Article X,
Sections 16-24, was approved, X County had a general operating
levy of fifty cents ($.50) per one hundred dollars ($100.00)
assessed valuation , which had been imposed without a vote of1the
people under Missouri Constitutio~, Article X, Section 11(b)
and Section 137 . 065.1 , RSMo 1978.
Ten cents ($.10) of that
fifty cent ($ . SS) levy was apportioned t~ the townships under
Sections 65.380
and 137.070, RSMo 1978.
Prior to November 4 , 1980, all of the townships in X County
formed each township into a single road district under what is
now Section 231 . 160, RSMo 1978 .
See also Section 65.390,
RSMo 1978.
There are no special road districts organized under
Chapter 233, RSMo, in X County.
Prior to November 4, 1980, the
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
voters of the road district voted in a levy of thirty-five cents
($.35) per one hundred dollars ($100 . 00) assessed valuation for
road and bridgE purposes under Missouri Constitution, Article X,
Section 12(a).
See State ex re l~ to use of Moore v .
Wabash R. Co. , 35 Mo. 380, 208 S . W.2d 223 (1948) (holding that
townships are not road districts for purposes of the additional,
voter- approved, thirty- five cent ($.35) road and bridge levy in
Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 12(a)).
After the 1978 amendment to Missouri Constitution , Article
X, Section 12(a) out prior to November 4, 1980 , all of the
townships in X County imposed a levy of fifty cents ($.50) per
one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed valuation for road and
bridge purposes without a vote of the people under Missouri
Constitution , Article X, Section 12(a) .
See Opinion No. 129,
Lybyer, 1979 (concluding that the thirty- five to fifty cent
($.35 to $.50) voter approval requirement of the 1978 amendment
to Missouri Constitution, Article X, Section 12(a) applies only
to counties and that the thirty- five cent ($.35) limitation in
Section 137.585, RSMo 1978, was superseded by the 1978 amendment
to Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 12 (a)) , copy
enclosed.
X County , itself, did not have a tax levy for road
and bridge purposes on November 4 , 1980 .
In 1985, X County and its townships and road districts were
subjected to both the general reassessmen7 tax rate rollback
under Section 137.073 . 2 , RSMo Supp. 1985 ,
and the Hancock
Amendment tax gate rollback, Missouri Constitution, Article X,
Section 22(a).
X County ' s general operating levy was rolled
back to forty - five cents ($.45) under the statutory rollback and
to forty - six cents ($ . 46 ) under the Hancock Amendment rollback ,
resulting in a general operating levy of forty - five cents ($.45)
per one hundred dollars ($100.00) asse9sed valuation.
See
Section 137.073 . 5(2) , RSMo Supp. 1985;
Opinion No . 46,
Proffer , 1982 (requiring the lowest of the two figures to be
imposed) .
Nine cents ($.09) of X County's forty - five cent
($ . 45) general operating levy is allocated to the townships
under Section 137.070 , RSMo 1978.
More than six (6) months prior to the general election to
be held on November 4 , 1986, a petition signed by at least one
hundred (100) qualified electors of X County prayinq for the
abolition of township organization is filed 1
~ith the X County
Commission under Section 65.610, RSMo 1978.
The X County .
Commission submits the following question to the voters at a
special election called within sixty (60) days of the filing of
the petition but prior to the l a st day for setting 1986 property
tax rates, to-wit:
-
2 -
-
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
OFFICIAL BALLOT
(Check the one for which you wish to vote.)
Shall township organization form
YES
of county government be abolished
in
County?
NO
A majority of the voters approve the abolition of township
organization, and as provided in Sectio~ 1
6S.610 , RSMo 1978:
" [E)xcept as provided in section 65.620
all laws in force in
relation to counties not having township organization shall
immediately take effect and be in force in such county."
(Endnote added.)
X County does have time to create generf~ road
districts in the county under Section 231.010, RSMo 1978,
before the 1986 tax-rate-setting deadline.
I.
Maximum X County General Operating Levy
Which Can Be Imposed Without an Election.
Missouri Constitution, Article X, Section 11(b) and
Section 137.065, RSMo 1978, authorize X County to impose a levy
of fifty cents ($.50) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed
valuation for "county purposes" .
(This levy has been rolled
back to forty-five cents ($.45) in the hypothetical.)
Section
137 . 070, RSMo 1978, requires the apportionment of this levy for
" county purposes" to the county and to the townships on an
eighty percent/twenty percent (80%/20%) basis .
The twenty
percent (20%) moneys from the county general operating levy
which are allocated to the townships are not independent levies
of townships but are merely an allocation of county taxes over
to political subdivisions of the counties.
See State ex rel.
Conrad v. Piper, 214 Mo. 439, 114 S . W. 1, 2 (bane 1908).
Thus,
when the voters in X County abolish the township form of
government, they do not abolish authority for the twenty percent
(20%) moneys allocated to the townships, because the twenty
percent (20%) moneys are part of the county levy and such is not
an independent levy of the township that is abolished when the
township form of government is abolished.
Accordingly, the maximum general operating levy that
X County could impose without a vote is forty-five cents ($.45)
per one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed valuation .
-
3 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
!I.
Maximum X Countv Road and Bridge Levy
Which Can Be Imposed Without an Election.
Missouri Constitution, 1
~rticle X, Section 12(a) and
Section 137 . 555, RSMo 1978 ,
authorize counties not under
township organization to impose a road and bridge levy of thirty-
five cents ($.35) per one hundred dollars ($100 . 00) assessed
valuation without a vote.
The 1978 amendment to Missouri
Constitution, Article X, Section '12 (a) increased the maximum
county road and bridge levy to fifty cents ($.50) per one
hundred dollars ($100 . 00 ) assessed valuation; provided , that any
county road and bridge levy above thirty-five cents ($.35) has
to be voter- approved.
Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 22(a) provides in
part:
(a)
Counties and other political
subdivisions are hereby prohibited from
levyinq any tax, license or fees , not
authorized by law , charter or self-
enforcing provisions of the constitution
when this section is adopted or from
increasinq the cur rent levy of an existinq
tax , license or fees , above that current
leVy authorized by law or charter when this
section is adopted without the approval of
the required majority of the qualified
voters of that county or other political
subdivision voting thereon . . . .
(Emphasis added.)
In the instant hypothetical , X County was "not authorized
by law" to impose a road and bridge levy on November 4 , 1980 .
See Missouri Constitution, Article X, Section 12(a) (allowinq
only the county courts of counties not under township gover~ent
to impose road and bridge levies) .
Because X County was not
authorized by law to impose a road and bridge levy on November
4, 1980, it must have voter approval to now impose a road and
bridge levy under Missouri Constitution, Article X, Section
22(a) .
X County cannot impose a road and bridge levy without
voter approval.
The X County general road districts are in a similar
situation .
When township organization was abolished , the
township road dis~ricts were also abolished.
The newly formed
-
4 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
county general road districts must obtain voter approval before
they can impose the additional thirty- five cents ($.35) per one
hundred dollars ($100 . 00) assessed valuation road and bridge
levy authorized by Missouri Constitution, Article X, Section
12(a).
This result is not only reached under the Hancock
Amendment but also under the language of Missouri Constitution,
Article X, Section 12(a) , itself .
III .
The Maximum X County Road and Bridqe Levy
Which Can be Imposed With a Vote of the People .
Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 12(a) allows X
County to impose a county road and bridge levy of fifty cents
($ . 50) per one hundred dollars ($100 . 00 ) assessed valuation;
provided , that the rate above thirty- five cents ($.35) must be
approved by a vote.
See note 6 , supra.
The thirty- five
cent ($ . 35) limitation in Section 137.555 , RSMo 1978, should be
disregarded .
See Opinion No. 129, Lybyer , 1979 .
Missouri
Constitution , Article X, Section 12 (a) also allows the voters of
general road districts to authorize a levy of up to thirty-five
cents ($ . 35) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed
valuation to be used for road and bridge purposes.
As stated earlier, we believe the Hancock Amendment,
Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 22(a), is applicable
to the initial imposition of the X County road and bridge levy
and to the initial imposition of X County ' s general road
districts .
The rollback formula f~und in Section
137 . 073 . 6(1) (b) , RSMo Supp . 1985,
is inapplicable to these
levies , because these levies did not exist in 1985 , the year of
the tax rate rollbacks , and such could not be reduced under
those provisions.
Accordingly, X ~ounty may impose a road and bridge levy of
fifty cents ($ . 50) per one hundred dollars ($100 . 00) assessed
valuation upon a simple majority vote of the electorate .
X County may impose an additional thirty- five cents ($ . 35) per
one hundred dollars ($100.00) assessed valuation levy for road
and bridge purposes upon a simple majority vote o~ the
electorate in its general road districts .
Very truly yours,
~~
WILLIAM L . WEBSTER
Attorney General
-
5 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
NOTES
(For clarity , section quotations generally include headings by
the Revisor of Statutes .)
1Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 11(b) states,
in part:
Section 11(b).
Limitations on local
tax rates.
Any tax imposed upon such
property by municipalities, counties or
school districts , for their respective
purposes , shall not exceed the following
annual rates:
*
*
*
For counties
thirty-five cents on
the hundred dollars assessed valuation in
counties having three hundred million
dollars or more , assessed valuation and
having by operation of law attained the
classification of a county of the first
class; and fifty cents on the hundred
dollars assessed valuation in all other
counties;
*
*
*
2section 137.065.1 , RSMo 1978 , states:
137.065.
Limit of county taxes
increase -- election --ballot. -- 1 .
For
county purposes the annual tax on property,
not including taxes for the payment of valid
bonded indebtedness or renewal bonds issued
in lieu thereof, shall not exceed the rates
herein specified:
In counties having three
hundred million dollars or more assessed
valuation the rates shall not exceed thirty-
five cents on the hundred dollars assessed
valuation; and in counties having less than
three hundred million dollars assessed
valuation the rate shall not exceed fifty
cents; provided, that in any county the
maximum rates of taxation as herein limited
may be increased for not to exceed four
years, when the rate and purpose of the
increase are submitted to a vote and two-
-
6 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
thirds of the voters of the county voting
thereon shall vote therefor .
3section 65 . 380, RSMo 1978, states:
65.380 .
Estimate of expenses. -- The
township board of directors shall, annually,
not less than twenty nor more than sixty
days prior to the first day of September,
make out and file with the clerk of the
county court of their county an estimate of
the amount of money required to defray the
expenses of said township during the next
ensuring year.
Said estimates shall be
signed by the president and attested by the
clerk of the board .
The clerk of the county
court shall cause the same to be placed on
the tax books of said township~ provided
that the amount of such expenses shall not
exceed in any one year twenty cents on the
hundred dollars assessed valuation of the
taxable property within said township.
4section 137 . 070, RSMo 1978 , states:
137 . 070 .
Apportionment in counties
having township organization. -- In all
counties in this state which have now or may
hereafter adopt township organization, if
the amount of revenue desired and estimated
by the county court for county purposes and
the amount desired and estimated by any
township board for township purposes shall
together exceed the rate percent on the one
hundred dollars valuation allowed by section
11 of article X of the Constitution of
Missouri for county purposes, then it shall
be the duty of the county court to apportion
the tax for county purposes between the
county organization and the township
organization in the following manner, to
wit:
Eighty percent of the taxes which may
be legally levied for county purposes shall
be apportioned to the county organization
for county purposes, and twenty percent of
such taxes shall be apportioned to the
township organization for the purposes
provided by section 65.360, RSMo, of the
township organization law, as specified by
-
7 -
The Honorable Mike Lvbver
the township board; but the combined rate
for both the county and township
organizations shall not exceed the maximum
rate provided by the constitution .
5section 231 . 160, RSMo 1978, states:
231 . 160 .
Board to form districts
boundary lines -- established how --
overseer -- appointment . - -
The township
board of directors shall form the township
into one or more road districts.
If the
boundary line of any road district is along
a public road , then one or the other edge of
said road , and not the center line, shall be
the boundary line of such road; and, in the
event the township boards of adjoining
townships are unable to agree upon the
boundary lines of roads that are on the
boundary lines of townships, then the county
court, or county courts , of the particular
county, or counties , interested shall settle
boundary lines along such township lines.
In the month of April each year the board
shall appoint a road overseer for each
district, who shall serve for one year and
until his successor is appointed and
qualified.
Any road overseer may be removed
from office by the township board for
incompetency , neglect or other good cause,
and a successor may be appointed by them in
his stead.
6Missouri Constitution , Article X, Section 12(a) states:
Section 12(a).
Add i tional tax rates
for county roads and bridges - -
road
districts -- reduction in rate may be
required , how.
In addition to the rates
authorized in section II [sic) for county
purposes, the county court in the several
counties not under township organization,
the township board of directors in the
counties under township organization, and
the proper administrative body in counties
adopting an alternative form of government,
may levy an additional tax, not exceeding
fifty cents on each hundred dollars assessed
valuation, all of such tax to be collected
-
8 -
-
The Honor able Mike Lybyer
and turned in to the county treasury to be
used for road and bridge purposes; provided
that , before any such county may increase
its tax levy for road and bri dge purposes
above thirty- five cents it must submit such
increase to the qualified voters of that
county at a general or special election and
receive the approval of a maj ority of the
voters voting on such increase .
In addition
to the above levy for road and bridge
purposes , it shall be the duty of the county
court, when so authorized by a majority of
the qualified electors of any road district ,
general or special, voting thereon at an
election held for such purpose , to make an
additional levy of not to exceed thirty- five
cents on the hundred dollars assessed
valuation on all taxable real and tangible
personal property within such district , to
be collected in the same manner as state and
county taxes, and placed to the credit of
the road district authorizing such levy ,
such election to be called and held in the
manner provided by law provided that the
general assembly may require by law that the
rates authorized her ein may be reduced.
7section 137.073.2 , RSMo Supp . 1985 , states:
2 .
Whenever changes in assessed
valuation that result from a general
reassessment of real property within the
county are entered in the assessor ' s books ,
the county clerk in all counties and the
assessor of St. Louis city shall notify each
political subdivision wholly or partially
within the county of the change in
valuation , and each political subdivision
wholly or partially within the county,
including municipalities maintaining their
own tax books, shall immediately revise the
rates of levy for each purpose for which
taxes are levied to the extent necessary to
produce from all taxable property, including
state assessed property , substantially the
same amount of tax revenue as \·las produced
in the previous year and , in addition
thereto , a percentage of the previous year ' s
-
9 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
revenues equal to the preceding valuation
factor of the political subdivision .
8The tax rate rollback provision in Missouri
Constitution, Article X, Section 22(a) provides :
If the assessed valuation of property as
finally equalized, excluding the value of
new construction and improvements, increases
by a larger percentage than the increase in
the general price level from the previous
year, the maximum authorized current levy
applied thereto in each county or other
political subdivision shall be reduced to
yield the same gross revenue from existing
property, adjusted for changes in the
general price level, as could have been
collected at the existing authorized levy on
the prior assessed value .
9The relevant language in Section 137.073.5(2), RSMo
Supp. 1985, states:
(2)
Each political subdivision shall
annually calculate each tax rate it is
authorized to levy and, in establishing each
tax rate , shall consider each provision for
tax rate rollback or reduction , provided in
this section and section 22 of article X of
the Constitution of Missouri, separately and
without regard to annual tax rate reductions
provided in sections 67 . 505 and 164.013,
RSMo.
Each political subdivision shall set
each tax rate it is authorized to levy using
the calculation that produces the lowest tax
rate ceiling.
10section 65.610 . 1, RSMo 1978 , provides:
65.610.
Aboli tion of township
organization -- procedure. -- 1.
Upon the
petition of at least on hundred qualified
electors of any county having heretofore
adopted township organization, praying
therefor, the county court shall submit the
question of the abolition of township
organization to the voters of the county at
a general or special election.
If the
petition is filed six months or more prior
-
10 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
to a general election, the proposition shall
be submitted at a special election to be
ordered by the county court within sixty
days after the pe-tition is filed; if the
petition is filed less than six months
before a general election, then the
proposition shall be submitted at the
general election next succeeding the filing
of the petition .
The election shall be
conducted, the vote canvassed and the result
declared in the same manner as provided by
law in respect to elections of county
officers.
The clerk of the county court
shall give notice that a proposition for the
abolition of township organization form of
county government in the county is to be
voted upon by causing a copy of the order of
the county court authorizing such election
to be published at least once each week for
three successive weeks, the last insertion
to be not more than one week prior to the
election, in some newspaper published in the
county where the election is to be held, if
there is a newspaper published in the county
and, if not, by posting printed or written
handbills in at least two public places in
each election precinct in the county at
least b;enty-one days prior to the date of
election.
The clerk of the county court
shall provide the ballot which shall be
printed and in substantially the following
form:
OFFICIAL BALLOT
(Check the one for which you want to vote)
Shall township organization form of
YES
county government be abolished in
County?
No
If a majority of the electors voting upon
the proposition shall vote for the abolition
thereof the township organization form of
county government shall be declared to have ·
been abolished; and township organization
shall cease in said county; and except as
provided in section 65 . 620 all laws in force
in relation to counties not having township
-
11 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
organization shall immediately take effect
and be in force in such county.
11s
t'
ec 10n 65 . 620 , RSMo Supp. 1984 , states:
65 . 620 .
Abolition of township
g over nment -- effect -- 1 .
Whenever any
county abolishes township organization the
county treasurer and ex officio collector
shall immediately settle his accounts as
treasurer with the county court and shall
thereafter perform all duties , exercise all
powers , have all rights and be subject to
all liabilities imposed and conferred upon
the county collector of revenue under
chapter 52 , RSMo, until the first Monday in
March after the general election next
following the abolishment of township
organization and until a collector of
revenue for the county is elected and
qualified .
The person elected collector at
the general election as aforesaid , if that
election is not one for collector of revenue
under chapter 52 , RSMo, shall serve until
the first Monday in March following the
election and qualification of a collector of
revenue under chapter 52, RSMo.
Upon
abolition of township organization a county
treasurer shall be appointed to serve until
the expiration of the term of such officer
pursuant to chapter 54 , RSMo .
2 .
Upon abolition of township
organization , title to all property of all
kinds theretofore owned by the several
townships of the county shall vest in the
county and the county shall be liable for
all outstanding obligations and liabilities
of the several townships .
3.
The terms of office of all
township officers shall expire on the
abolition of township organi zation and the
township trustee of each township shall
immediately settle his accounts with the
county clerk and all township officers shall
promptly deliver to the appropriate county
officers, as directed by the county court ,
-
12 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
all books, papers, records and property
pertaining to their offices.
12section 231.010, RSMo 1978, states:
231 . 010.
County courts to divide
counties into road districts. -- The county
courts of all counties, other than those
under township organization, shall, during
the month of January, 1918, with the advice
and assistance of the county highway
engineer, divide their counties into road
districts, all to be numbered, of suitable
and convenient size, road mileage and
taxable property considered .
Said courts
shall, during the month of January
biennially thereafter, have authority to
change the boundaries of any such road
district as the best interest of the public
may require.
13section 137 . 555, RSMo 1978 , states:
137.555.
Special road and bridge tax ,
how levied , collected and disbursed . -- In
addition to other levies authorized by law,
the county court in counties not adopting an
alternative form, of government and the
proper administrative body in counties
adopting an alternative form of government ,
in their discretion may levy an additional
tax , not exceeding thirty- five cents on each
one hundred dollars assessed valuation, all
of such tax to be collected and turned into
the county treasury, where it shall be known
and designated as "The Special Road and
Bridge Fund " to be used for road and bridge
purposes and for no other purpose whatever;
provided, however , that all that part or
portion of said tax which shall arise from
and be collected and paid upon any property
lying and being within any special road
district shall be paid into the county
treasury and four-fifths of such part or
portion of said tax so arising from and
collected and paid upon any property lying
and being within any such special road
district shall be placed to the credit of
such special road district from which it
-
13 -
The Honorable Mike Lybyer
arose and shall be paid out to such special
road district upon warrants of the county
court , in favor of the commissioners or
treasurer of the district as the case may
be; provided further , that the part of said
special road and bridge tax arising from and
paid upon property not situated in any
special road district and the one- fifth part
retained in the county treasury may, in the
discretion of the county court , be used in
imp~oving or repairing any street in any
incorporated city or village in the county,
if said street shall form a part of a
continuous highway of said county leading
through such city or village.
The thirty- five cent ($.35) limitation in this statute should be
disregarded. See Opinion No. 129, Lybyer , 1979.
14s t·
ec 10n 137.073.6(1) (b) , RSMo Supp. 1985, provides:
6 .
(1)
In all political
subdivisions except school districts, the
tax r~te ceiling established pursuant to
this section shall not be exceeded in the
year of the tax rate reduction or thereafter
unless a higher tax rate is approved by a
vote of the people.
Approval of the higher
tax rate shall be by at least a majority of
votes cast , except:
*
*
*
(b)
When a higher tax rate , before
reduction , could have been approved by a
majority of the votes cast, the maximum tax
rat~ increase that can be approved by a
majority after reduction shall be completed
as follows:
The maximum cumulative percent
the original tax rate ceiling can be
increased by a majority vote in the future
shall be the same percent which the tax rate
prior to reduction was exceeded by the
maximum tax rate that could be voted by a
majority; any increase in the tax rate
ceiling beyond that percent shall require
approval by at least two- thirds of the votes
cast;
-
14 -