No. 22-88
(1) A decision by the county commission to close the courthouse would be beyond its authority and thus void; however, the commission is not prohibited from reducing the number of hours each day the courthouse is open to the public, and (2) the county commission's failure to pay elected officials does not alleviate or affect the county's obligation to pay them.
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 22-88
COUNTIES:
COUNTY COMMISSIONS:
(1) A decision by the county
commission to close the
courthouse would be beyond its
authoritv and thus void;
however,-the commission is not
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
COUNTY COURTHOUSE:
prohibited from reducing the number of hours each day the
courthouse is open to the public, and (2) the county
commission's failure to pay elected officials does not alleviate
or affect the county's obligation to pay them.
July 27, 1.988
Mr. Winston Buford
Shannon County Prosecuting Attorney
Post Office Box 429
Eminence, Missouri 65466
Dear Mr. Buford:
OPINION NO. 22-88
This opinion is in response to your questions asking:
QUESTION NO. 1:
Can the county
commissioners order the closing of the
courthouse doors?
QUESTION NO. 2:
Can the county
commissioners cease paying elected county
officials?
QUESTION NO. 1
Section 49.310, RSMo 1986, requires the county commission
(formerly called the county court) to erect and maintain a
courthouse at the established county seat, stating in pertinent
part:
The county commission in each county in
this state shall erect and maintain at the
established seat of justice a
good and
sufficient courthouse, •••
The county commission's powers are limited and defined by
statute and whenever the county steps outside of and beyond this
authority its acts are void.
Browning-Ferris Industries of
Kansas City, Inc. v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801, 808 (Mo. App.
1984).
Accordingly, the county commission must keep the
courthouse doors open.
A "county courthouse" is a building
Winston Buford
wherein courts are held and records kept and county officers
maintain their offices and perform their function at the county
seat.
Odell v. Pile, 260 S.W.2d 521, 524 (Mo. 1953).
Th~
public must have reasonable access to the county's official
records, as well as the circuit court's official records, and
reasonable access to the offices of the county officials for
conducting county and court business.
However, we find no law
prohibiting a commission from reducing the number of hours each
day the courthouse is held open to the public for conducting
county and court business.
QUESTION NO. 2
Section 50.330, RSMo 1986, requires payment of county
officials' salaries:
"Any salary provided for a county officer,
deputies and assistants, shall be paid in monthly installments
on the first day of each month, by warrants drawn on the county
treasury."
(Emphasis added).
The salary of the elected county
officials is determined by statute enacted by the legislature,
which amounts to a mandate to the county commission to budget
such amounts.
Failure to do so does not prevent the creation of
the obligation.
The legislature has created the obligation by
statute, and such obligations imposed by the legislature have
priority over other such items as to which the county commission
has discretion to determine whether or not such obligation
should be incurred.
To permit public officials elected or
appointed to receive, by agreement or otherwise, a less
compensation for their services than fixed by law, would be
contrary to "public policy" of the state.
Reed v. Jackson
Countv, 142 S.W.2d 862, 865 (Mo. 1940).
The Missouri Supreme Court noted in Gill v. Buchanan
Countv, 142 S.W.2d 665 (Mo. 1940) that:
Failure to budget funds for the full
~ount of salaries due officers of the county,
under the applicable law, which the county
court must obey cannot bar the right to be
paid the balance.
~., 142 S.W.2d at 668.
In view of Section 50.330, RSMo 1986, and the above-cited
court decisions, it is clear that to permit pub1ic officers,
elected or appointed, to receive, by agreement or otherwise, a
less compensation for their services than fixed by law, would be
contrary to the public policy of the state.
-
2 -
!j
Winston Buford
Concl.usion
It is tbe op1n1.on of this office that: (1) a decision by
the county commission to cl.ose the courthouse would .be beyond
its authority and thus void; however, the commission is not
prohibited from reducing the number of hours each day the
courthouse is open to the publicr and (2) the county
commission's failure to pay elected officials does not alleviate
or affect the county's obligation to pay them.
Very truly yours,
~L~
Attorney General
-
3 -