No. 25-88
The same person may not simultaneously hold the office of presiding commissioner of the county commission and the office of member of the board of directors of an ambulance district within that county.
Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-88
Mo!BULANCE DI:STRICTS:
CONFLICT OF INT~R'ES"r;
COUNTIES:
COUNTY COMMISS~ONS:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS<
INCOMPATIBILITY OF OFfiCES:
qthe s.ame person may .not s im~l.-
taneously hold the office of
presiding commissioner 9f the
county commission ~nd the office
of member of the board of
directors of an ~ulance
district within that county.
February 11, 1988
OPINIO~ NO. 25-88
The Honorable Stephen R. Waters
Representative, District 1
.-~
I
Fll.ED;
.f
State Capitol Building, Room 135 A-B
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
.;2 ~
~
Dear Representative Waters:
This opinion is in response to your question asking:
Can a Clark County elected official also
hold a position with the Clark County
Ambul~~ce District without a conflict of
interest?
Specifically, you are asking whether the Presiding
Commissioner of the Clark County Commission can simultaneously
hold office as Secretary-Tre~$urer of the Clark County Ambulance
District.
Although it is n,ot necessary that the secretary or
treasurer of an ambulance district also be. a member of the board
of directors, you have indicated that the subject of this
request is in fact also .a director.
See Section 190.055 .1,
RSMo 1986.
---·
There is no express constitutional or statutory provision
that prohibits the presiding commis.sioner of the county commis-
sion from occupying the office of ~ulance district director.
However, it is not; necessary that there be an express prohibi-
tion since the MissQuri courts recognize the common law doctrine
prohibiting ~ public officer from holding two incompatible
offices at th~ s~e time.
This doctrine of incompatibility of o.ffices is more fully
discussed in Missouri Attorney General Opinion No. 2, Anderson,
1961, a copy of which is enclosed.
The authorities citeQ in
that opinion conclude that offices are incompatible when the
duties and £unctions are inherently inconsistent and repugnant
so that one person cannot discharge the duties of both offices
faithfully. impartially, and efficiently. The authorities also
note that it is not an essential element of incompatibility that
The Honorable Stephen R. Waters
the clash of duty exist in all or in the greater part of the
official functions.
67 C.J.S. Officers S 27 (1978), states in
part:
Accordingly, a conflict of interest exists
where one office is subordinate to the
other, and subject in some degree to the
supervisory power of its incumbent, or
where the incumbent of one of the offices
has the power of appointment as to the
other office, or has the power to remove
the incumbent of the other or to punish the
other.
Furthermore, a conflict of interest
may be demonstrated by the power to regu-
late the compensation of the other, or to
audit his accounts.
The statutes outlining the authority and duties of the
commissioners of county commissions and the directors of
ambulance districts contain instances where obvious conflicts
would arise if the same person were to hold such offices simul-
taneously.
Section 190.050.1, RSMo 1986, authorizes the county
commission to create and reapportion the election districts for
ambulance districts.
Under certain circumstances, the county
commission is also authorized to fill vacancies on the ambulance
district board of directors when the board is unable to do so.
Section 190.052, RSMo 1986.
In light of these areas of potential conflict between the
offices, we conclude that there is in fact an incompatibility
and repugnancy between the office of presiding commissioner of a
county commission and the office of member of the board of
directors of an ambulance district within that county.
As a
result of such incompatibility and conflict, the same person may
not hold these offices simultaneously.
Conclusion
It is the opinion of this office that the same person may
not simultaneously hold the office of presiding commissioner of
the county commission and the office of member of the board of
directors of an ambulance district within that county.
Very truly yours,
~.J;$;
WILLIAM L. WEBSTER
Attorney General
Enclosure:
Attorney General Opinion No. 2, Anderson, 1961
-
2 -