No. 37-65

Opinion letter to the Honorable Allen S. Parish

Year: 1965Length: 156 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Mo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 37-65

OPINION NO. 37 (1965) OPINION NO. 420 (1964) Answered by Letter - Storts Pebruary 25, 1965 Honorable All en s. Parish Prosecuttng Attorn«Y Saline County Jlai'ahall, IUsaouri Dear Allena On December 11, 1964 you sent ua your request tor an op~ion u to tlbether the Beeorder ot Deeds may legallY tile or record an instrument Where the notary public has not attue4 an ~reaa1on type seal to the aeknowle4gment but has ettixe4 a rubber stamp seal. !he C1rcuit Court of St. Lou1a County 1n State ex re~ . L1pa1tz.t et al.,. v. John IOob, Case -.,. 259700, Equ1 ty Vi Viaicn ordered tbe issuance of a writ ot JMndaaua to compel the Beeorder ot DeedS to accept and reeord a deed in whiCh the notary public' s seal was a rubber stamp seal. We agree with the eonelUDion reached by the Circuit JUdge. BS :df;mac Very truly your a, IOlDIAI a. DDiDdl Attomey General FILED 37
No. 37-65: Opinion letter to the Honorable Allen S. Parish | Justis AI