7 CSR 10-18.040
Opportunity to Appeal Proposed Disqualification and Review Board Proceedings
PURPOSE: This rule provides for the contractor to appeal any recommended disqualification and provides the procedures for the
review board.
(1) Appeal of Proposed Disqualification. Any
contractor who is recommended for disqualification may appeal the decision to the review
board and request an informal hearing.
(2) Procedure for Appeals. The contractor
shall submit its request in writing for an informal hearing to the Secretary, Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission, P.O.
Box 270, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Requests for review shall be submitted by the
contractor within thirty (30) calendar days
after the date the notice of proposed disqualification was mailed to the contractor. If the
contractor requests a timely informal hearing,
the department shall advise the contractor of
the time, date and place for the informal
hearing. This is not a contested case under
Chapter 536, RSMo. The rules of evidence
shall not apply at the hearing.
(3) Review Board Proceedings. The review
board shall review the information received by
the department and the contractor regarding
the proposed disqualification. The contractor
may submit documentation to support its position at the informal hearing. The contractor
may also present any argument regarding the
proposed disqualification. Additionally, the
review board may request further information
or documentation from the contractor or any
department employee, and shall be provided
with any further information or documents
deemed relevant to its review. Upon review of
all the information provided to the review
board, the review board will make its written
findings and recommendations to the chief
engineer.
(4) Time of Review Board’s Proposed Finding and Recommendation. The review board
will make its findings and recommendations
within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of
the review board’s hearing.
(5) Review Board’s Written Report. The
review board shall make a written report to
the chief engineer, summarizing its findings
and recommendations regarding whether the
contractor should be disqualified. A cause for
disqualification must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. The chief engineer may concur in or modify the review
board’s findings and recommendations.
(6) Procedures for When No Appeal is Taken
on the Department’s Recommendation. If the
contractor does not timely appeal the department’s recommendation, the division engineer
or director shall forward the recommendation
to the chief engineer for an abbreviated review
of the written recommendation for disqualification, setting forth its supporting reasons.
The review board will not participate in this
review. If the chief engineer does not concur
in the recommendation that the contractor be
disqualified, s/he shall notify the contractor in
writing of its continued status as responsible.
If the chief engineer believes disqualification
is appropriate after this review, s/he shall
inform the contractor of the department’s decision that the contractor be disqualified and the
length of time for the disqualification.
(7) No Appeal for Certain Causes of Disqualification. Whenever a proposed action is
based upon a conviction, judgment, admission, or debarment, or other declaration of
ineligibility by another state, political subdivision, or federal entity for any of the causes
listed in subsection (1)(C) or (E) of 7 CSR
10-18.020, and adequate evidence of that
event may be established by documented evidence a fact-finding hearing need not be conducted.
AUTHORITY: Art. IV, section 29, Mo.
Const., sections 226.020, 226.130, 226.150,
227.030, 227.100, and 227.210, RSMo 2016
and Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
part 29.* Original rule filed Dec. 12, 1996,
effective June 30, 1997. Amended: Filed Dec.
8, 2016, effective July 30, 2017.
*Original authority: 226.020, RSMo (1939); 226.130,
RSMo (1939), amended 1993, 1995; 226.150, RSMo
(1939), amended 1977; 227.030, RSMo (1939); 227.100,
RSMo (1939), amended 1963, 1967, 1969, 2002; and
227.210, RSMo (1939).