7 CSR 10-4.010
Administrative Review of Denial of Eligibility Or Amount of Relocation Assistance Benefits
PURPOSE: This rule provides a uniform system for administrative
review of department determinations as to the eligibility for
relocation assistance payments, the amount of relocation
assistance payments, or both.
(1) Request for Administrative Review. Any person aggrieved by
a final district determination as to eligibility for, the amount
of a relocation assistance payment, or both, is entitled to
administrative review of the determination by filing a written
request for hearing with the district engineer.
(A) Receipt Deadline. The request for hearing must be
received by the district engineer within sixty (60) days after
receipt by the applicant of the written notice of relocation
claim rejection from the district engineer.
(B) Application. To be sufficient to authorize administrative
review, the applicant’s written request for hearing shall identify
the person requesting the hearing, state that such person is
eligible for a relocation assistance payment, and request that
a relocation assistance payment in a specific amount be made
to such person.
(C) Answer. No answer or response by the department is
necessary. Upon receipt of a request for hearing, the district
engineer immediately shall forward the request along with a
copy of the district engineer’s written notice of relocation claim
rejection to the commission’s chief counsel. The chief counsel
shall acknowledge receipt of the request and assign counsel as
the commission’s hearing examiner and department counsel,
respectively, to the hearing.
(2) Untimely Request for Administrative Review. Untimely
requests for hearing shall result in the appeal board having no
jurisdiction to hear the request. As a result, the commission’s
hearing examiner shall issue an order that dismisses the
applicant’s request and notify the applicant or counsel for
applicant and department counsel in writing by certified mail,
return receipt requested of the order.
(3) Hearing Officer. The hearing examiner will conduct the
hearing as provided in Chapter 536, RSMo and this rule,
including, but not limited to, ruling on all discovery matters,
objections, and motions, and having the hearing record
transcribed.
(4) Notice of Hearing. The hearing examiner shall give written
notice of the date of the hearing to the applicant or counsel
for applicant and counsel for the department, and the hearing
date will be not less than fifteen (15) days from the date of
the notice. In instances where more than one (1) request for
hearing is received from the same applicant, the hearing
examiner may consolidate the cases. Either party may request
that the hearing examiner grant a continuance. All hearings
will be held at the Missouri Department of Transportation
Building, 105 W. Capitol Avenue, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
(5) Discovery. Any party may conduct any method of discovery
authorized in Chapter 536, RSMo.
(6) Subpoenas. Witnesses may be summoned to appear to give
testimony or to give testimony and produce documents from
a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum issued by the hearing
examiner as authorized under section 536.077, RSMo.
(7) Hearing. There are only two (2) ultimate issues in a
relocation assistance case—eligibility of the applicant for a
relocation assistance payment and the amount of the payment.
The applicant presents evidence first at the hearing in support
of the applicant’s claim for relocation assistance benefits. Then
the department presents its evidence. The parties may make
closing arguments before conclusion of the hearing. Any party
may file a written brief and the hearing examiner may request
any party to file a written brief, suggested findings of fact and
conclusions of law, or both, within the time set by the hearing
examiner.
(8) Record. Any party may obtain a copy of the transcript of the
hearing at that party’s expense.
(9) Report and Order. The hearing examiner shall submit to
the appeal board a copy of the record along with a proposed
report and order.
(10) Final Decision of the Appeal Board. The commission
delegates to and vests its final authority to determine relocation
assistance claims in an appeal board which consists of the
chief engineer or a designated assistant, the assistant to the
state design engineer right-of-way, or a designated assistant
and the chief counsel or a designated counsel that did not
serve as the hearing examiner at the hearing. The board shall
render a final decision by a majority vote with each board
member having one (1) vote. The appeal board’s decision shall
be the final decision of the commission.
(11) Conflict With Other Administrative Rules. The provisions
of this rule supersede any inconsistent provisions in 7 CSR 104.020.
AUTHORITY: sections 226.150 and 523.210, RSMo 2016; 42 U.S.C.
Chapter 61; 23 CFR Part 710; and 49 CFR Part 24.* Original rule
filed June 9, 1975, effective June 19, 1975. Amended: Filed Nov. 24,
1975, effective Dec. 4, 1975. Refiled March 17, 1976. Rescinded and
readopted: Filed March 4, 1983, effective June 15, 1983. Amended:
Filed May 17, 1993, effective Jan. 31, 1994. Amended: Filed Nov. 14,
2017, effective June 30, 2018.
*Original authority: 226.150, RSMo 1939, amended 1977 and 523.210, RSMo 1971.
Smith v. Missouri State Highway Commission, 488 SW2d 230
(Mo. App. 1972). Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review an
appeal of State Highway Commission’s denial of assistance under
the Federal Highway Relocation Assistance Act of 1968. Court held
commission’s rulings were quasijudicial and affected “private
rights” of appellant, thus making judicial review possible by
Article 5, Section 22, Constitution of Missouri, 1945. (“Contested
case.”)
Davis Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission, 141
SW2d 214 (Mo. App. 1940). By the terms of section 8106 (now
section 226.150, RSMo (1969)) it was the duty of the State Highway
Commission when federal funds were made available for use on
the projects (road projects), in this case within the limits of the
City of Sedalia, to comply with all rules and conditions, that is to
say, requirements made by the Bureau of Public Roads, to obtain
TRANSPORTATION
the payment to the state of Missouri of the allotment made by the
federal government.