Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Turnage (Oct. 11, 2021)
J.Turnage - October 11, 2021 - Recreation Department Expenditures
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
October 11, 2021
Jeffrey J. Turnage, Esq.
Attorney, City of Columbus
Post Office Box 1366
Columbus, Mississippi 39703-1366
Re:
Recreation Department Expenditures
Dear Mr. Turnage:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Questions Presented
1. May the City of Columbus’ (the “City”) Recreational Department (the “Department”)
provide art and craft supplies to participants at a recreation authority neighborhood park
facility free of charge?
2. Assuming your answer to question number 1 is “no,” may the Department collect a fee for
participation in a program that is sufficient to cover the cost to the recreation authority for
the provision of the art and craft supplies?
3. The Department also provides after-school programs at its recreation authority facilities. Is
it legally allowed to staff the recreation facilities with employees to oversee the recreation
functions for free, or does it have to collect a fee from the program participants sufficient
to cover the salary of the employees?
4. If all the above questions are answered in the negative, may the City enter into an Interlocal
Agreement with the local school district in order to provide the service at its recreation
authority facility?
Preface
Columbus is a special charter municipality, and as such, the powers of the municipality flow
directly from its charter. Ordinarily, questions about the workings of a municipality operating
under a special charter should be answered by reference to the specific provisions of that charter;
however, if the special charter is silent on a particular matter, general statutory provisions would
Jeffrey J. Turnage, Esq.
October 11, 2021
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
apply. MS AG Op., Carouthers at *1 (June 28, 2019). You have indicated that the special charter
of the City of Columbus is silent on the matters raised herein, and this office accepts your assertion.
Thus, this opinion applies general statutory provisions.
Brief Response
1. Assuming the City has made the proper factual findings that the program is consistent with
Mississippi law, the Department may expend public funds for arts and crafts supplies to be
used by participants at a recreation authority neighborhood park facility, at no cost to the
participants.
2. Your second question is premised on a negative response to your first question. Because
we answered your first question in the affirmative, your second question is moot.
3. Assuming the City has made the proper factual findings that the program is consistent with
Mississippi law, the City is authorized to spend municipal funds to pay operational costs
of the park, which includes hiring personnel to run authorized programs.
4. Your fourth question is premised on negative responses to questions 1 through 3. Because
we have answered questions 1 and 3 in the affirmative, your fourth question is moot.
Applicable Law and Discussion
Pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 7-5-25, official opinions of the Attorney General
are limited to questions of law for future guidance and can neither validate nor invalidate past
action. Therefore, to the extent the Department currently operates an after-school program, we
provide guidance for prospective application only.
In response to your first question, multiple statutes authorize a municipality to create and fund
parks, playgrounds, and recreation facilities and to equip, maintain, and operate the same.1 See,
e.g., Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-1-3 (“The governing authority of each county and municipality may
create playgrounds and public parks, and for these purposes, each of such governing authorities
shall possess the power, where requisite, of eminent domain and the right to apply public money
thereto, and may issue bonds therefor as otherwise permitted by law.”); 21-17-1 (authorizing
municipalities to purchase real estate for “all proper municipal purposes, including parks”); 55-9-
1 (authorizing any available surplus funds to be used for “constructing, equipping, maintaining
and operating . . . recreational centers . . . or parks.”). Additionally, this office has previously
opined that municipalities have authority to implement recreational and athletic programs. MS AG
Op., Danos at *1 (Aug. 22, 2014) (relying on “Home Rule” authority set forth in Section 21-17-
5). Clearly, municipalities are vested with broad authority to establish, regulate, and fund parks
and recreational facilities.
1 This opinion presumes the City of Columbus has not established a park commission, pursuant to Section
21-37-33 et seq.
Jeffrey J. Turnage, Esq.
October 11, 2021
Page 3
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
Moreover, Section 17-3-1 authorizes counties and municipalities to expend public funds on
advertising, which includes “newspaper and magazine advertising and literature, publicity,
expositions, public entertainment or other form of advertising or publicity, which in the judgment
of such board or boards will be helpful toward advancing the moral, financial and other interests
of such municipality or county . . . .” Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-3-1–3.
Based on the broad authority set forth above, this office is of the opinion that if the City makes the
requisite factual findings that the program is consistent with Mississippi law, the Department—
through its duly-authorized budget—may expend public funds for arts and crafts supplies to be
used by participants at a recreation authority neighborhood park facility, at no cost to the
participants. See MS AG Op., Taylor at *1 (May 10, 1996) (finding municipal governing board
decides how municipal funds will be allocated for municipal parks, and the parks and recreation
director will thereafter decide “how funds which are not specifically designated for certain
purposes by the board of aldermen within the budget of the department will be spent”); see also
MS AG Op., Short at *1 (Oct. 9, 1998) (opining that a recreation department may provide free
transportation to and from participants’ residences, to recreation facilities, and on field trips).
Your second question is premised on a negative answer to your first question. Because we
answered your first question in the affirmative, your second question is moot.
With respect to your third question, in light of our response to your first question, if the City makes
the requisite factual findings, the Department may staff recreational facilities with employees to
oversee the Department’s authorized recreational functions at no cost to program participants. This
office has found that a municipality may operate its own baseball program for community children,
either through a municipal park commission or through the city itself. MS AG Op., Smith at *1
(Jan. 17, 1990); see also Danos, at *1 (recognizing a municipality’s authority to operate
recreational and athletic programs and to spend municipal funds in pursuit of such programs).
Operating the program would include hiring personnel to run the program and the purchasing of
necessary supplies, equipment, and uniforms. Smith at *1. It is the opinion of this office that the
City may use public funds to staff authorized programs.
Your fourth question is premised on negative responses to questions 1 through 3. Because we
have answered questions 1 and 3 in the affirmative, your fourth question is moot.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Misty Monroe
Misty Monroe
Special Assistant Attorney General