Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Hensarling (Dec. 17, 2021)
R.Hensarling - December 17, 2021 - Jurisdiction of City Police Officer for Security Purposes
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
December 17, 2021
Mr. Robert Hensarling
President, McComb/Pike County Airport Board
1018 Pinehurst West
McComb, Mississippi 39648
Re:
Jurisdiction of City Police Officer for Security Purposes
Dear Mr. Hensarling:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Background Facts
The McComb/Pike County Airport (“Airport”) was established by a joint resolution between the
City of McComb and Pike County pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 61-5-1 et seq.,
and it is located within the city limits of Magnolia, Mississippi.
Question Presented
Can a City of McComb police officer, acting in his or her official capacity, provide security at the
Airport Board meeting, given that the Airport office is located within the city limits of Magnolia,
rather than within McComb?
Brief Response
No, the territorial jurisdiction of police officers of a municipality is limited to the corporate limits
of the municipality. Therefore, a City of McComb police officer could not provide official on-duty
security services at the Airport located within the city limits of Magnolia.
Applicable Law and Discussion
The territorial jurisdiction of a municipal police department is set by Section 21-21-1. MS AG
Op., Stanford at *1 (Apr. 15, 1988). Section 21-21-1 provides, in part:
The marshal or chief of police shall be the chief law enforcement officer of the
municipality and shall have control and supervision of all police officers employed
Mr. Robert Hensarling
December 17, 2021
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
by said municipality. The marshal or chief of police shall be an ex officio constable
within the boundaries of the municipality, and he shall perform such other duties as
shall be required of him by proper ordinance.
In describing the jurisdiction of municipal police officers to areas outside the corporate limits of
the municipality, this office has consistently opined in the following manner:
The territorial jurisdiction of the chief of police and therefore all police officers of
a municipality serving under him is thereby limited to the corporate limits of the
municipality. This office knows of no statutory authority which extends the
jurisdiction of municipal police officers to areas outside the municipality, simply
because such areas are owned by the municipality.
MS AG Op., Stanford at *1 (Apr. 15, 1988).
In Stanford, we found that a city police department would have no jurisdiction at an airport that
the city owns but was outside the city limits. As a general matter, “a municipal police department
is not authorized to enforce the law beyond the municipal limits, even where property outside the
city is owned by the city.” MS AG Op., Bowman at *2 (Mar. 9, 2001) (involving an airport located
in one county but owned and operated by a municipality and a different county). Notably, there is
an exception in a case of hot pursuit. MS AG Op., Richardson at *1 (Dec. 18, 1998); MS AG Op.,
Denton at *1 (Nov. 1, 2013). Accordingly, the City of McComb’s police officers, in their official
capacity, would not have jurisdiction to provide security services at the Airport.
Pursuant to Sections 61-5-13 and 61-5-39, the joint airport board could appoint airport guards to
enforce the Airport Board’s ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations, with the approval of
the governing boards of the City of McComb and Pike County.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Gregory Alston
Gregory Alston
Special Assistant Attorney General