Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Frieson (Jan. 24, 2023)
R.Frieson - January 24, 2023 - Consultant Selecting Contractor for Town Construction Project
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
January 24, 2023
Renetha L. Frieson, Esq.
Attorney, Town of Tutwiler
Post Office Box 1811
Greenville, Mississippi 39702-1811
Re:
Consultant Selecting Contractor for Town Construction Project
Dear Ms. Frieson:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Background
Your request provides the facts as follows: The town of Tutwiler is in the process of constructing
a park that is anticipated to cost more than $75,000.00. In accordance with Section 31-7-13(c) of
the Mississippi Code, the town clerk advertised for competitive bids; however, no bids were
received in response to the advertisement. The design consultant for the project requested
permission to extend “private invitations” to potential qualified contractors, to select a contractor
from the top three bidders of the potential qualified contractors, and to recommend the contractor
he selects to the Board of Supervisors for approval.
Questions Presented
1. Can the Board of Aldermen authorize a design consultant to extend “private invitations” to
potential qualified contractors for competitive bids when no bids were received after
publishing for competitive bids in the local newspaper under Section 31-7-13(c)?
2. Would allowing the design consultant to extend “private invitations” for competitive bids
violate Section 31-7-13(c) when no bids were received after publishing for competitive
bids in the local newspaper under Section 31-7-13(c)?
3. If the Board of Aldermen is permitted to authorize the design consultant to extend “private
invitations” to potential qualified contractors, can the Board of Aldermen allow the design
consultant to select and recommend a contractor from the top three bidders resulting from
the design consultant’s private invitation?
Renetha L. Frieson, Esq.
January 24, 2023
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
Brief Response
1. No. Issuing private invitations to select contractors does not comply with the publication
or notice requirements in Section 31-7-13(c) for purchases over $75,000. If the publication
and notice deadlines have passed, and no bids were received, the procedure set out in
Section 31-7-13 must start anew.
2. Our response to your first question renders this question moot.
3. Our response to your first question renders this question moot.
Applicable Law and Discussion
As an initial matter, the Office of the Attorney General is authorized to issue official opinions for
prospective use only and cannot validate or invalidate past actions. See Miss. Code Ann. § 7-5-25.
In response to your first question, Section 31-7-13(c)(i), which outlines the mandatory bidding
procedure for purchases over $75,000.00 provides, in relevant part:
Purchases which involve an expenditure of more than Seventy-five Thousand
Dollars ($75,000.00), exclusive of freight and shipping charges, may be made from
the lowest and best bidder after advertising for competitive bids once each week
for two (2) consecutive weeks in a regular newspaper published in the county or
municipality in which such agency or governing authority is located.
* *
*
*
*
The date as published for the bid opening shall not be less than seven (7) working
days after the last published notice; however, if the purchase involves a construction
project in which the estimated cost is in excess of Seventy-five Thousand Dollars
($75,000.00), such bids shall not be opened in less than fifteen (15) working days
after the last notice is published and the notice for the purchase of such construction
shall be published once each week for two (2) consecutive weeks. . . . The notice
of intention to let contracts or purchase equipment shall state the time and place at
which bids shall be received, list the contracts to be made or types of equipment or
supplies to be purchased, and, if all plans and/or specifications are not published,
refer to the plans and/or specifications on file. If there is no newspaper published
in the county or municipality, then such notice shall be given by posting same at
the courthouse, or for municipalities at the city hall, and at two (2) other public
places in the county or municipality, and also by publication once each week for
two (2) consecutive weeks in some newspaper having a general circulation in the
county or municipality in the above-provided manner. . . .
Miss. Code Ann. § 31-7-13(c)(i)1, 3.
Renetha L. Frieson, Esq.
January 24, 2023
Page 3
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
The municipality must also comply with the requirements for determining the lowest and best bid
in Section 31-7-13(d)(i), which specifically provides:
If any governing authority accepts a bid other than the lowest bid actually
submitted, it shall place on its minutes detailed calculations and narrative summary
showing that the accepted bid was determined to be the lowest and best bid,
including the dollar amount of the accepted bid and the dollar amount of the lowest
bid. No agency or governing authority shall accept a bid based on items not
included in the specifications.
The above quoted sections do not provide for issuing private invitations for bids in lieu of the
mandatory publication and notice procedures as described in your request. Further, allowing a third
party to select and recommend a contractor from a limited pool of bidders who respond to the
private invitation does not comply with the procedure for selecting the lowest and best bid. The
Mississippi Supreme Court has held that county supervisors “may act and authorize bids and
contracts only by orders and resolves formally adopted and entered on the minutes.” Richardson
v. Canton Farm Equipment, Inc., 608 So. 2d 1240, 1246 (Miss. 1992). This is true for a municipal
board of aldermen as well. Interpreting Section 31-7-13, this office has previously opined that
there is “no authority which would permit the board to consider a bid for which there was no
authorized advertisement.” MS AG Op., Evans at *1 (Aug. 16, 1995). While the town could
contact potential contractors in addition to publication to let them know about the project so that
they may submit bids in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 31-7-13, doing such in
lieu of the statutory bidding procedure is not authorized by the statute. Accordingly, it is the
opinion of this office that Tutwiler must comply with the publication and notice deadlines and the
procedure for selecting the lowest and best bid in Section 31-7-13(d)(i), which does not
contemplate or allow for private invitations for bids in lieu of the competitive bid procedure. If the
publication and notice deadlines have passed, and no bids were received, the procedure set out in
Section 31-7-13 must start anew.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Beebe Garrard
Beebe Garrard
Special Assistant Attorney General