Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Morris-Harris (June 29, 2023)
S.Morris-Harris - June 29, 2023 - Unauthorized Purchase
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
June 29, 2023
Stephanie N. Morris-Harris, Esq.
Attorney, Bolivar County Board of Supervisors
Post Office Box 698
Cleveland, Mississippi 38732
Re:
Unauthorized Purchase
Dear Ms. Morris-Harris:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Background
According to your request, the Bolivar County (“County”) Road Manager secured a $600 purchase
order for the one-week rental of certain equipment in September 2022. However, the equipment
was not returned to the rental company until January 2023, resulting in invoices to the County
totaling $7,272. The additional rental fees incurred for the rental of the equipment were not
authorized by the Bolivar County Board of Supervisors (“Board”), and thus, according to your
request, violate the relevant purchase laws.
Questions Presented
1. May Bolivar County petition a court of competent jurisdiction for authority to pay the
additional invoices, or must the court proceeding be initiated by the vendor?
2. Is there any authority under which Bolivar County may initiate an action in court to correct
the error/failure and pay the vendor?
Brief Response
Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 19-13-23 and 19-13-31 provide the statutory scheme for
persons having claims against a county. Under this scheme, a person must first file a claim with
the clerk of the board of supervisors. If the board of supervisors rejects or refuses the claim, the
claimant may appeal to the circuit court or may bring suit against the county.
Stephanie N. Morris-Harris, Esq.
June 29, 2023
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
Applicable Law and Discussion
As an initial matter, opinions of this office are limited to prospective questions of state law. Miss.
Code Ann. § 7-5-25. This office does not validate or invalidate past actions. Therefore, to the
extent your request deals with the County’s compliance with the central purchasing requirements
established in Sections 31-7-101 et seq., this office must decline to respond with an official
opinion. MS AG Op., Brock (Nov. 8, 2019). However, for informational purposes only, we find
the following purchasing laws relevant to your described circumstances: Section 65-17-1(9)
(providing county road manager may lease equipment “as may be necessary for operation of the
county road department in conformity with the budget, in accordance with the central purchase
system and existing laws and subject to approval of the board as to price or rental”); Section 65-
7-95 (providing requirements for board of supervisors to rent road machinery or equipment); and
Section 31-7-13(b) (providing bidding requirement and procedure for purchases over $5,000 but
not over $75,000).
Regarding the County’s ability to seek court authority or initiate a court action to pay the subject
invoices, it is the opinion of this office that Mississippi law does not authorize the County to do
so. Section 19-13-23 sets forth how claimants must submit claims against counties. It provides:
Any person having a just claim against any county shall first file the same on or
before the last day of the month for which such claim may be payable, with the
clerk of the board of supervisors for presentation to the board for allowance, which
said claim shall be properly dated and itemized, and shall be accompanied by any
evidence of performance or delivery as required by Section 19-13-25. The claimant
may amend said claim at any time before final rejection or allowance, and may
appear before the board and submit further evidence or argument in support thereof,
having a continuance for either or both of said purposes if desired.
Section 19-13-31(1) sets forth the requisite process once a claim has been submitted in accordance
with Section 19-13-23. Section 19-13-31(1) states, in pertinent part:
At each regular meeting of the board, the claims docket shall be called . . . . All
claims found by the board to be illegal, and which cannot be made legal by
amendment, shall be rejected or disallowed. All other claims shall be audited, and
all those found proper upon due proof shall be allowed in the order in which they
appear on the docket, whether or not there shall then be sufficient money in the
several funds on which warrants must be drawn for their payment. Those claims as
to which a continuance is requested by the claimant, and those found to be defective
but which might be perfected by amendment shall be continued.
. . .
If the board shall reject any such claim in whole or in part, or refuse, when requested
at a proper time, to pass finally thereon, the claimant may appeal to the circuit court,
or may bring suit against the county on such claim.
Stephanie N. Morris-Harris, Esq.
June 29, 2023
Page 3
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
. . .
In processing claims of vendors the board of supervisors shall be subject to the
provisions of Sections 31-7-301, 31-7-305, 31-7-309, 31-7-311, and 31-7-313.
(Emphasis added).
In summary, once a claimant has properly filed a claim against the County in accordance with
Section 19-13-23, the Board shall then follow the procedures for the administration of claims set
out in Section 19-13-31. If the Board makes the factual determination that a claim can be made
legal by amendment, then it may be approved and allowed. However, if the Board makes the
factual determination that a claim is “illegal, and . . . cannot be made legal by amendment,” it
“shall be rejected or disallowed.” Miss. Code Ann. § 19-13-31(1). Beyond this, to be allowed,
claims must be audited and determined proper upon due proof. Id.; see also MS AG Op., Sanders
at *2 (Oct. 18, 2013) (opining that a county board of supervisors “must examine the evidence
before it concerning the claim . . . make findings of fact, and reflect the same in the minutes”). If
a claim is rejected or refused by the Board pursuant to Section 19-13-31, the claimant must appeal
to the circuit court or bring suit against the County. Miss. Code Ann. § 19-13-31(1); see also Miss.
Code Ann. § 11-51-75 (providing procedure to appeal a judgment or decision of the board of
supervisors of a county).
It is thus the opinion of this office that Sections 19-13-23 and 19-13-31 do not authorize the County
to petition a court of competent jurisdiction for authority to pay an invoice, nor do they authorize
the County to initiate an action in court to correct the County’s failure to pay an invoice.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Maggie Kate Bobo
Maggie Kate Bobo
Special Assistant Attorney General