Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Crow (Aug. 23, 2023)
S.Crow - August 23, 2023 - Mississippi Code Annotated Section 65-1-179(4)
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
August 23, 2023
Shannon Crow, Esq.
Attorney, Yalobusha County Board of Supervisors
203 Wagner Street
Water Valley, Mississippi 38965
Re:
Mississippi Code Annotated Section 65-1-179(4)
Dear Mr. Crow:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Background
According to your request, in February 2019, a bridge in Yalobusha County (the “County”)
suffered irreparable damage due to flooding. In August 2019, the County and the Mississippi
Department of Transportation (“MDOT”) entered into an agreement to construct a new bridge (the
“Project”). Pursuant to the agreement, federal reimbursement for the cost of the Project would be
80%, and the County would be solely responsible for the remaining costs.
In October 2020, the County declared necessity for borrowing money, pursuant to Mississippi
Code Annotated Sections 17-21-51, et seq., for the sole purpose of paying costs it incurred on the
Project. The County directed that the General Obligation Note (“Note”) in the principal amount of
$686,604.87 be offered for sale on sealed bids, and Trustmark National Bank was confirmed and
approved as the highest bidder. The note requires the County to make five (5) annual payments of
$137,320.97 plus interest at 1.61%, commencing on February 1, 2022 and ending on February 1,
2026. The 2022 and 2023 payments were paid from funds budgeted by Yalobusha County
Supervisory District 5 where the Project is located.
In 2021, the County and MDOT accepted a bid for the Project in the amount of $16,240,280.65.
To date, the Project is ongoing, and the estimated total cost is in excess of $20 million, including
necessary work outside of the construction contract.
On or about August 1, 2022, the County and MDOT entered a Memorandum of Understanding
outlining the County’s receipt of $3,140,000.00 in Section 65-1-179 Emergency Road and Bridge
Shannon Crow, Esq.
August 23, 2023
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
Repair funds to be used on the Project. The County desires to use these Emergency Road and
Bridge Repair funds to service its debt on the Note.
Questions Presented
1. May Emergency Road and Bridge Repair funds be used to repay money borrowed out of
necessity by the County to pay Project costs when the money was borrowed prior to the
County’s award of the Emergency Road and Bridge Repair grant?
2. May the County’s Emergency Road and Bridge Repair funds be used to reimburse the
budget of Yalobusha County Supervisory District 5 for the Note payment remitted on
February 1, 2022 and/or for the Note payment remitted on February 1, 2023?
3. May the County’s remaining three (3) Note payments be paid from its Emergency Road
and Bridge Repair funds?
Brief Response
1. Borrow and expend are not synonymous. If the County makes the factual determination
that payment on the subject note is an “expen[se] on the [P]roject,” the County may use
the Emergency Road and Bridge Repair funds to make such payments that become due
after the date the County received the Emergency Road and Bridge Repair funds.
2. No. Even assuming the County makes the factual determination that payment towards the
Note is an “expen[se] on the [P]roject,” the County may not reimburse itself for any amount
that it expended on the Project prior to the date it received the Emergency Road and Bridge
Repair funds.
3. Please see the response to your first question.
Applicable Law and Discussion
Section 65-1-179(1) sets forth the creation of a special fund in the State Treasury known as the
Emergency Road and Bridge Repair (“ERBR”) Fund. Section 65-1-179(2) provides how the fund
shall be utilized:
Money in the fund shall be utilized by the Mississippi Department of
Transportation, with the advice of the Emergency Road and Bridge Repair Fund
Advisory Board, to provide funding for emergency repairs to roads, streets and
highways in this state and emergency bridge repairs on public roads, streets and
highways in this state, as determined by a majority vote of the Mississippi
Transportation Commission.
Relevant to this opinion, Section 65-1-179(4) provides, in pertinent part, “[u]nder no
circumstances . . . shall Emergency Road and Bridge Repair Fund monies be used to reimburse
Shannon Crow, Esq.
August 23, 2023
Page 3
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
any amount that has been expended on the project prior to the award of such monies to the
recipient.” (emphasis added).
While the statute does not define the term “expend,” Merriam-Webster defines the term as “to pay
out” or “to make use of for a specific purpose.” MERRIAM-WEBSTER DICTIONARY,
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/expend (last visited August 23, 2023). You ask
whether ERBR funds may be used to repay money borrowed out of necessity by the County to pay
Project costs when the money was borrowed prior to the County’s award of the ERBR grant.
Merriam-Webster defines “borrow” as “to receive with the implied or expressed intention of
returning the same or an equivalent.” MERRIAM-WEBSTER DICTIONARY, https://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/borrow (last visited August 23, 2023). Accordingly, “expend” and
“borrow” are not synonymous.
It is therefore the opinion of this office that if the County makes the factual determination that
payment on the subject note is an “expen[se] on the [P]roject,” the County may use the ERBR
funds to make such payments that become due after the County’s receipt of the ERBR funds. This
is because the expenditure occurs when the payment is made. This said, pursuant to Section 65-1-
179, any payment must still be in accordance with the County’s Memorandum of Understanding
with MDOT.
Finally, the County’s receipt of ERBR funds may implicate federal law. This opinion does not
consider such implications because this office may not opine on matters of federal law. Miss. Code
Ann. § 7-5-25.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Maggie Kate Bobo
Maggie Kate Bobo
Special Assistant Attorney General