Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Holleman (Apr. 18, 2024)
T.Holleman - April 18, 2024 - County Public Defender's Salary
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
April 18, 2024
Tim C. Holleman, Esq.
Attorney, Harrison County Board of Supervisors
1720 23rd Avenue
Gulfport, Mississippi 39501
Re:
County Public Defender’s Salary
Dear Mr. Holleman:
The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.
Question Presented
Based on clarification we received from you by telephone, we understand your question to be:
Does the phrase “but in no event to exceed the compensation of the district attorney” set forth in
Mississippi Code Annotated Section 25-32-5 apply to a full-time public defender representing one
county?
Brief Response
Section 25-32-5’s phrase “but in no event to exceed the compensation of the district attorney”
applies to each category of full-time public defenders, i.e., “a public defender, who shall be full-
time, representing an entire circuit court district . . . a public defender representing one (1) county
. . . and . . . a public defender representing two (2) or more counties, but less than the entire circuit
court district.”
Applicable Law and Discussion
As an initial matter, to the extent this request involves any action already taken by the board of
supervisors, this office cannot validate or invalidate any past action.
Section 25-32-5 provides, in relevant part:
Compensation for the public defender shall be fixed by the board of supervisors, if
two (2) or more counties are acting jointly; however, the compensation for a public
defender, who shall be full-time, representing an entire circuit court district shall
not be less than the compensation of the district attorney, the compensation for a
public defender representing one (1) county shall not be less than the compensation
of the county prosecuting attorney and the compensation for a public defender
Tim C. Holleman, Esq.
April 18, 2024
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
representing two (2) or more counties, but less than the entire circuit court district,
shall not be less than the aggregate of the compensation for county prosecuting
attorneys of the counties served, but in no event to exceed the compensation of the
district attorney.
(emphasis added). As stated by the Mississippi Supreme Court, “[s]tatutes must be read according
to their intended purpose.” Manning v. State, 371 So. 3d 117, 127 (Miss. 2022).
Section 25-32-5 lays out the salary of public defenders based on the number of counties served,
and each category is proportional to the salary of the corresponding prosecutor. For a public
defender representing an entire multi-county circuit court district, the salary correlates to the salary
of the district attorney who also represents the entire multi-county circuit court district. For a public
defender who represents only one county, the salary correlates to the salary of the county
prosecutor representing only that one county. Likewise, a public defender who represents two or
more counties but less than an entire circuit court district has a salary that correlates to the salaries
of the county prosecutors representing those two or more counties. In sum, the salaries of the public
defenders and prosecuting attorneys are commensurate and proportional based on the number of
counties served.
This logic is reflected in the statute’s language and structure. Compensation of the public defender
is commensurate with the workload of the prosecutorial counterpart and is based on the category
of representation: district to district, county to county, and counties to counties. Thus, the plain
statutory purpose dictates that the final clause of the first sentence of Section 25-32-5 —“but in no
event to exceed the compensation of the district attorney”— refers to and captures all of the
preceding categories of public defenders. If the drafters had wanted to single out only the category
immediately preceding the limiting language, they could have simply said “not to exceed” instead
of “but in no event to exceed.” For the statute to retain its logical, proportional salary scheme, a
public defender representing only one county cannot make more than a district attorney
representing an entire multi-county circuit court district.
For these reasons, it is the opinion of this office that the phrase “but in no event to exceed the
compensation of the district attorney” applies to each category of full-time public defenders, i.e.,
“a public defender, who shall be full-time, representing an entire circuit court district . . . a public
defender representing one (1) county . . . and . . . a public defender representing two (2) or more
counties, but less than the entire circuit court district.” Miss. Code Ann. § 25-32-5.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Maggie Kate Bobo
Maggie Kate Bobo
Special Assistant Attorney General