Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Odom (Aug. 31, 2020)
T.Odom – August 31, 2020 – Payment of Attorney’s Fees in Commitment Proceedings
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
August 31, 2020
The Honorable Troy Farrell Odom
Chancellor, Twentieth Chancery Court District
Post Office Box 700
Brandon, Mississippi 39043
Re:
Payment of Attorney’s Fees in Commitment Proceedings
Dear Chancellor Odom:
The Office of the Attorney General is in receipt of your request for the issuance of an official
opinion.
Question Presented
May the chancery court assess, to the petitioner, costs of counsel appointed pursuant to Mississippi
Code Annotated Section 41-32-5(2)?
Background
Mississippi Code Annotated Section 41-31-5 pertains to the proceedings that follow a petition for
the commitment of alcoholics and drug addicts to public institutions for treatment. Section 41-32-
5(2) pertains to the proceedings that follow a petition for the commitment of alcoholics and drug
addicts to private treatment facilities.
Subparagraph (2) of each statute requires a chancellor to, before a hearing may be held on the
commitment petition, appoint an attorney to represent respondents who do not otherwise have an
attorney. Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-35-5(2), 41-32-5(2). Both statutes are silent as to who is
responsible for the payment of those court-appointed attorneys’ fees. It is the position of the
Rankin County Chancery Court, however, to assess those attorneys’ fees to the petitioner,
classifying such charges as court costs.
Brief Response
The Court may assess, to a non-indigent respondent or his/her estate, the costs of legal
representation incurred by an attorney appointed to represent the respondent in proceedings related
The Honorable Troy Farrell Odom
August 31, 2020
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
to alcohol and/or drug commitment to either a public or private facility.
We find no authority for a court to assess the petitioner (affiant) for the costs of legal counsel
appointed pursuant to Section 41-32-5(2), relating to commitment to private treatment facilities.
Applicable Law and Analysis
As a general rule, statutes or statutory provisions that relate to the same person or thing, or to the
same class of persons or things or appear to be indicative of a general policy on a cognate subject
matter are regarded as in pari materia. Lopez v. Holleman, 69 So. 2d 903 (Miss. 1954); MS AG
Op., Taylor at *3 (July 10, 1995).
Recognizing that there appears to be no statutory provision designating who should be assessed
the expenses for the services of an appointed attorney in commitment proceedings to private
institutions, we are of the opinion that Section 41-21-61 et seq., applicable to commitments to
public institutions, is indicative of legislative intent on a cognate subject matter and is, therefore,
applicable to commitment proceedings to private institutions.
Section 41-21-63 provides, in relevant part:
(1) No person, other than persons charged with crime, shall be committed to a
public treatment facility except under the provisions of Sections 41-21-61 through
41-21-107 or 43-21-611 or 43-21-315.
. . .
(2)(a) The chancery court, or the chancellor in vacation, shall have jurisdiction
under Sections 41-21-61 through 41-21-107 except over persons with unresolved
felony charges unless paragraph (b) of this subsection applies.
Section 41-21-79 provides:
The costs incidental to the court proceedings including, but not limited to, court
costs, prehearing hospitalization costs, cost of transportation, reasonable
physician’s, psychologist’s, nurse practitioner or physician assistant’s fees set by
the court, and reasonable attorney’s fees set by the court, shall be paid out of the
funds of the county of residence of the respondent in those instances where the
patient is indigent unless funds for those purposes are made available by the state.
However, if the respondent is not indigent, those costs shall be taxed against the
respondent or his or her estate. The total amount that may be charged for all of the
costs incidental to the court proceedings shall not exceed Four Hundred Dollars
($400.00). Costs incidental to the court proceedings permitted under this section
may not be charged to the affiant nor included in the fees and assessments permitted
under Section 41-21-65(6).
The Honorable Troy Farrell Odom
August 31, 2020
Page 3
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
Section 41-21-65(6) states:
The chancery clerk may charge a total filing fee for all services equal to the amount
set out in Section 25-7-9(o), and the appropriate state and county assessments as
required by law which include, but are not limited to, assessments for the Judicial
Operation Fund (Section 25-7-9(3)(b)); the Electronic Court System Fund (Section
25-7-9(3)(a)); the Civil Legal Assistance Fund (Section 25-7-9(1)(k)); the Court
Education and Training Fund (Section 37-26-3); State Court Constituent's Fund
(Section 37-26-9(4)); and reasonable court reporter's fee. Costs incidental to the
court proceedings as set forth in Section 41-21-79 may not be included in the
assessments permitted by this subsection. The total of the fees and assessments
permitted by this subsection may not exceed One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00).
Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-65(6) (emphasis added).
Costs incidental to the court proceedings as set forth in Section 41-21-79 include reasonable
attorneys’ fees. These fees, pursuant to Sections 41-21-65(6) and 41-21-79, may not be charged
to the petitioner/affiant but only to the non-indigent respondent or his/her estate.
Based upon our opinion that Section 41-21-61 et seq. is applicable to commitment proceedings to
public and private institutions, we further opine that the costs of legal counsel appointed by the
court to represent the respondent in such alcohol and/or drug commitment proceedings to a private
facility are to be borne by a non-indigent respondent or by his or her estate.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Phil Carter
Phil Carter
Special Assistant Attorney General