Miss. Op. Att'y Gen., Espy (Aug. 31, 2020)
M.Espy – August 31, 2020 – Eminent Domain
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
August 31, 2020
Mike Espy, Esq.
Board Attorney, Madison County Board of Supervisors
Post Office Box 608
Canton, Mississippi 39046
Re:
Eminent Domain
Dear Mr. Espy:
The Office of the Attorney General is in receipt of your request for the issuance of an official
opinion.
Question Presented
Must Madison County offer “just compensation,” pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section
43-37-3(c)(i), to commercial stores that are parties to a “cross parking agreement,” though none
have an ownership interest in the property the county seeks to acquire?
Background
Madison County intends to acquire a right-of-way in order to expand a heavily trafficked county
roadway. The property is owned by one store, located within a commercial shopping center.
However, all stores in the shopping center are parties to a “cross parking agreement.” The property
the county seeks to acquire does not touch upon, lessen, diminish or reduce any part of the parking
lot or access area(s) within the shopping center.
Brief Response
Pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 7-5-25, the Office of the Attorney General is
authorized to issue official opinions upon questions of state law only. Thus, we cannot by official
opinion interpret the terms or provisions of an agreement or contract or infer facts that may be
relevant to our opinion. Thus, this opinion is not based on any term or provision of the referenced
cross parking agreement, a copy of which was not provided with your request. Further, this office
Mike Espy, Esq.
August 31, 2020
Page 2
550 HIGH STREET • SUITE 1200 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
POST OFFICE BOX 220 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
TELEPHONE (601) 359-3680
has relied solely upon the background facts as were provided by your request and as recited above
in the issuance of its official opinion.
Madison County must only pay just compensation to the owner of the real property being acquired,
in accordance with Section 43-37-3.
Applicable Law and Discussion
Our constitution mandates that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use except
upon due compensation to the owner thereof. MISS. CONST. art III, § 17 (emphasis added).
Due compensation has two components: The value of the property taken and the damage, if any,
to the remainder. Trustees of Wade Baptist Church v. Miss. State Highway Comm’n, 469 So. 2d
1241, 1244 (Miss. 1985) (citing Miss. State Highway Comm’n v. McArn, 246 So. 2d 512, 514
(Miss. 1971)). Stated differently, when a part of a larger tract is taken, the property owner is
entitled to the difference between the fair market value of the whole tract, immediately prior to the
taking, and the fair market value of the remaining tract, immediately after the taking. Neither
access nor parking are attributes or capabilities of land subject to separate valuation in eminent
domain proceedings. They may be considered only insofar as they affect the value of the property
remaining after the taking. Trustees of Wade Baptist Church, 469 So. 2d at 1245; Muse v. Miss.
State Highway Comm’n, 103 So. 2d 839, 847 (Miss. 1958).
The facts set forth in your request, however, do not mention an alteration or restriction of either
access or parking by virtue of Madison County’s intended acquisition.
Mississippi Code Annotated Section 43-37-3 sets forth the necessary procedures and prerequisites
for the acquisition of real property using public funds. This section requires that every reasonable
effort be made to negotiate with the owner of the real property prospectively being acquired. See
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-37-3(a), (c)(i). Only the owner of the real property being acquired is entitled
to just compensation and, where appropriate, additional compensation may be warranted for
damages to the remaining real property. Miss. Code Ann. § 43-37-3(c)(i). Section 43-37-3 makes
no provision for just compensation to be paid to others.
It is, therefore, the opinion of this office that Madison County may only pay just compensation to
the owner of real property the county acquires, pursuant to Section 43-37-3.
If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Kim P. Turner
Kim P. Turner
Assistant Attorney General