23 MAC Pt. 102, R. 1.14
Recipients Moving to Mississippi From Another State
Cite as 23 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 102, R. 1.14
Recipients Moving to Mississippi From Another State
A. Termination of Benefits in the Former State of Residence.
1. An individual coming to Mississippi from another state may be considered a resident of
Mississippi in the month of the move, provided the individual intends to reside in
Mississippi.
2. Individuals are not entitled to duplication of Medicaid services from both the former state
and Mississippi. When a Medicaid recipient moves from one state to another, the former
state initiates the change effective the first month in which it can administratively terminate
the case in accordance with timely and adequate notice regulations.
B. Request for Mississippi Medicaid Prior to Termination in Former State.
1. There will be occasions when a recipient requests that eligibility in Mississippi begin prior
to the effective date of closure in the former state. Neither state can deny coverage because
of administrative requirements or time constraints needed to take action to terminate
benefits in the former state.
2. When an individual is no longer a resident of a state, that state is not required to pay for
any services incurred in Mississippi.
a) If the former state will pay out-of-state claims or the partial and subsequent months for
a nursing home recipient, Mississippi cannot approve eligibility until the former state
has terminated services.
b) If the former state will not pay out-of-state claims, duplication of services is not an
issue, and Medicaid eligibility in Mississippi can potentially begin with the month of
the move.
C. If an institutionalized individual moves to Mississippi, that individual must apply for benefits
in Mississippi and must meet all eligibility requirements. If the individual is transferred directly
from one medical facility to another, the time spent in the out-of-state facility can be used to
meet the thirty (30) consecutive day requirement.
D. When two (2) or more states cannot agree on residence, the state where the individual is
physically located is the individual’s residence. Coordination efforts should ensure that an
eligible person does not experience a discontinuation of benefits.