11 MAC Pt. 4, R. 3.1
(A)(1)(a) and 3.1(A)(2) or a part of a grant awarded for the cost of
Cite as 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.1
(A)(1)(a) and 3.1(A)(2) or a part of a grant awarded for the cost of
employing a solid waste enforcement officer, described in Rule
3.2(A)(1)(d) and 3.2(A)(8).
(6)
Other Grant Guidelines
(a)
Generally, no grant shall be awarded under Rule 3.1(A)(3) and (4) for any
activity, which receives less than 75% of its waste tires from Mississippi
waste tire sites, retailers or residents. However, the Commission may
consider requests for funding from applicants who do not meet this
requirement contingent upon the applicant demonstrating that the activity
does or will accept Mississippi waste tires and that the award of the
requested funding would be in the best interest of the State of Mississippi.
The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to demonstrate that
eligibility requirements have been met.
(b)
No grant shall be awarded for the purchase or lease of equipment or other
property, unless it can be demonstrated that such equipment or property is
integral to the successful achievement of the overall goals of Rule
3.1(A)(1)(a), (b), or (c).
(c)
No grant shall be awarded to a local government under Rule 3.1(A)(3),
(4), or (5), if it is determined that the local government has not developed
an adequate local waste tire collection and clean-up program.
(d)
No grant shall be awarded if the grant is determined by the Department to
be inconsistent with a local, solid waste management plan that has been
submitted to and approved by the Commission.
B.
Grant Application Procedures
(1)
In order to receive consideration for a grant award from the Commission on
Environmental Quality, persons or entities shall submit to the Department an
application package, including an original and two (2) copies of a grant
application. The application package shall contain the following items:
(a)
a completed grant application form, as provided by the Department;
(b)
a detailed narrative description of the proposed activity and discussion of
the technical and economic feasibility of the project;
(c)
documentation of completion of the intergovernmental review process as
described in the appendix to this rule, including copies of all
intergovernmental review agency comments received;
(d)
a copy of all local, state, and federal permits to conduct the proposed
activity;
(e)
all other forms, documents, and supporting information required by the
Department.
(2)
Where funds requested exceed funds available, applications shall be evaluated
and ranked, with preference for approval based on the following factors:
(a)
For local community waste tire collection and clean-up grants:
(1)
The applicant has not been previously funded or has not received
funds during the current state fiscal year.
(2)
The project proposes to recycle waste tires for other uses rather
than conducting activities which simply lead to the disposal of the
tires.
(3)
The funds requested will be used as leverage, or matching for
additional funds.
(4)
The project is proposed to serve an area that has inadequate waste
tire management capacity.
(5)
The project proposes to process or manage a larger number of
waste tires than other projects proposed.
(b)
For waste tire recycling/research grants:
(1)
The project proposes to recycle the whole tire rather than use only
parts of the tire.
(2)
The project is an integral part of a county or regional waste tire
management plan.
(3)
The funds requested will be used as leverage, or matching for
additional funds.
(4)
The technical and/or economic merits of the project appear
superior to other projects proposed.
(5)
The project is proposed to serve an area that has inadequate waste
tire management capacity.
(6)
The project proposes to process or manage a larger number of
waste tires than other projects proposed.
(7)
The project proposes to employ higher numbers of persons than
other projects proposed.
(8)
The proposal is vital to the continuation and/or completion of an
on-going research project.
(9)
The project is proposed by a university, college, other academic
group, or public agency.
(c)
For tire-derived product grants:
(1)
The applicant has not been previously funded or has not received
funds during the current state fiscal year.
(2)
The tire-derived product to be used is a newly developed
product or has not previously been utilized in Mississippi.
(3)
The purchase of the tire-derived product will lead to the
establishment or growth of efforts to manufacture the product in
Mississippi.
(4)
The proposal is deemed to be creative and innovative and has a
high potential for providing additional solutions to the problems
of waste tire management.
(5)
The local government applicant has established an ongoing
successful waste tire collection and clean-up program including
an adequate number of collection sites and appropriate public
outreach efforts.
(d)
For solid waste enforcement officer grants:
(1)
The applicant has established an ongoing, successful, local solid
waste enforcement program.
(2)
The applicant has adopted enforceable and appropriate local
dumping ordinances or laws.
(3)
The applicant has demonstrated a long term commitment of
funding support to the employment and work efforts of a local
solid waste officer, rather than for just the proposed grant
period.
(4)
The applicant proposes an enforcement program that will serve
a wider geographic area and/or a larger population base than
other projects.
(5)
The applicant has established an ongoing successful waste tire
collection and clean-up program including an adequate number
of collection sites and appropriate public outreach efforts.
C.
Disapproval of Grant Applications
(1)
The Department may refuse to approve a grant application for any of the
following reasons:
(a)
the Department determines that the project is not consistent with state law or
with Rule 3.1(A) or (B) of these regulations;
(b)
the Department determines that the project is not consistent with the
approved local solid waste management plan;.
(c)
the Department determines that, for those proposals involving incentive
recycling projects, the project is not likely to result in the utilization of
a manufactured product or recovered rubber, or the utilization of waste
tires as a fuel or fuel supplement;
(d)
the Department determines that, for those proposals involving research
and demonstration projects, the project is not directly related to solving
a solid waste problem resulting from waste tires, or is not likely to
result in solving the problem;
(e)
the Department determines that the applicant does not possess the
required local, state, or federal permits necessary to construct or
conduct the proposed activity;
(f)
the applicant is in violation of, or delinquent on, any condition of a
previously awarded grant by this Department;
(g)
the applicant has been significantly or habitually in violation of
environmental laws, regulations, or permits;
(h)
the applicant has deliberately falsified information submitted as
part of the application;
(i)
the Department determines that the applicant has proposed
expenditures for grant project activities or components that are
unnecessary or that exceed the expected usual and customary costs for
such activities or components.
(j)
the Department determines there are insufficient funds in the waste tire
account.; and
(k)
the proposal ranks lower than other projects based on the factors
described in Rule 3.1(B).
(2)
If the Department should refuse to approve a grant application for any reason,
the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with
Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code Annotated.
D.
Conditions of Grant Awards
(1)
Grants made to counties, municipalities or regional solid waste management
authorities shall require compliance with all applicable procurement and
purchasing regulations established pursuant to state law.
(2)
At the discretion of the Commission, monies which are unspent after the
expiration date of the grant award shall be forfeited back into the waste tire
account.
(3)
Grants made to any person or group which are awarded for less than 100% of
the total estimated costs of the project shall ensure that the grantee's matching
share is expended or committed in proportion to the release of state grant
funds.
(4)
The Commission may include any other conditions as part of the grant award
which it determines are necessary to reasonably manage the project and/or
protect the environment.
E.
Reallocation of Funds
The Commission, upon determination that unused grant funds are available in a
particular category, may reallocate funds between the programs described in paragraph
A.1 of this rule.