16 MAC Pt. 3, R. 8.6
CLG Participation in the National Register Process
Cite as 16 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 8.6
CLG Participation in the National Register Process. The CLG will be involved in the
National Register process in the following manner:
A. Unless the CLG itself has initiated the nomination, the MDAH/SHPO will forward a
copy of completed National Register nominations to the CLG for all properties within
that jurisdiction within sixty (60) days of receipt of the nomination by MDAH.
The CLG shall submit a statement to the MDAH/SHPO regarding the eligibility of each
property or district proposed for nomination to the National Register within its
jurisdiction. This statement shall include the recommendation of the Commission and
must include the opinion of the chief elected official or governing body. The statement
may be as simple as an affirmation that the property is eligible, or it may be a lengthy
research report stating why the property should not be nominated. The statement or report
should concentrate on the property’s eligibility under the National Register of Historic
Places criteria. Guidelines on how to apply these criteria in the evaluation of an
individual property will be provided by the MDAH/SHPO. Reference could also be made
to the CLG’s historic preservation plan or other relevant planning documents. A copy of
the report prepared by the CLG for the MDAH/SHPO shall be made available within the
local jurisdiction for public inspection.
If the CLG does not provide a statement in a timely fashion, the nomination will be
processed. However, frequent failure to submit statements on the eligibility of properties
nominated within the jurisdiction of the CLG after the MDAH/SHPO has informed the
CLG of a pending nomination will be considered during the next scheduled performance
evaluation and may have an effect on the community’s continued certification.
B. Within sixty (60) days of the of the date of the nomination is forwarded to the CLG, after
providing a reasonable opportunity for public comments, the Commission shall prepare,
and the chief elected official or local coordinating official shall transmit to the
MDAH/SHPO and the property owner(s), a statement reflecting the CLG’s opinion
regarding the eligibility of the property. If the Commission and chief elected official or
governing body do not agree, both opinions shall be forwarded.
C. If both the Commission and the chief elected official or governing body recommend that
a property not be nominated because the property does not meet National Register of
Historic Places criteria, the MDAH/SHPO will so inform the property owner(s) and the
Mississippi Historic Preservation Professional Review Board (Review Board), and the
property will not be nominated unless an appeal is filed within sixty (60) days with the
MDAH/SHPO under the regulation established for the appeals process which is outlined
in Section 101 (c) (2) of the National Historic Preservation Act (and in the State Program
Manual).
D. If either or both the Commission and the chief elected official governing body agree that
the property meets National Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria, and when the
National Register nomination is professionally and technically sufficient to meet National
Register standards as interpreted by the MDAH/SHPO, the nomination will be
transmitted for review to the Review Board. The opinion or opinions of the Commission
and the chief elected official/governing body will be presented to the Review Board at
that time for its consideration.
E. After considering all opinions, the State Review Board shall make its recommendation to
the MDAH/SHPO, who will then make a final determination regarding submission of the
nomination to the Keeper of the National Register pursuant to Section 101 (a) of the Act
and 36 CFR 60.6. The Commission, the chief elected official/governing body, the
property owner, or any member of the public may appeal the final SHPO decision
directly to the Keeper under the provisions outlined in 36 CFR 60.12
In order to expedite the nomination process, a CLG may elect to send a supporting letter
with the nomination when it is first submitted to the MDAH/SHPO. The letter should be
signed by both the chief elected official and the authorized representative of the
Commission. The letter may be accompanied by a formal report, but should, at the least,
clearly state that in their opinion the property is eligible for the National Register.
Upon written agreement between the CLG and the MDAH/SHPO, the CLG may elect to
have all National Register nominations within their jurisdiction acted upon locally before
being submitted to MDAH. In this case, copies of any nominations received by MDAH
without having first been acted upon by the CLG will be provided to the CLG, and no
action will be taken by MDAH until the CLG has acted upon the nomination. If the city
has not acted upon the nomination within sixty (60) days, the applicant may resubmit it to
MDAH for action.
Upon written agreement between the CLG and the MDAH/SHPO, the CLG may elect to
assume responsibility for notification of property owners and the public throughout the
nomination process. In this case, it will be the responsibility of the CLG to meet the
public notice requirements specified by the National Register nomination procedures of
the Department of the Interior. In addition to the requirement for public input into the
above reporting requirement and notification to property owners regarding the CLG’s
opinion concerning the National Register eligibility of their property, the CLG will be
responsible for notifying property owners, other local government agencies, and county
and/or regional planning agencies as appropriate throughout the nomination process and
for providing MDAH/SHPO with copies of all notification notices. Unless otherwise
stated in the agreement, the MDAH/SHPO will provide notification of nominations to the
National Park Service, certified local program organizations, and appropriate federal and
state officials.
Participation in the notification procedures throughout the nomination process will
provide the CLG with greater opportunity for public input and for resolving local
differences of opinion prior to submission of the nomination to the Review Board.
If a CLG assumes the notification responsibilities, the MDAH/SHPO will provide
guidelines regarding persons to be contacted and the content and timing of the
notification letters. The CLG will maintain on file records documenting the notification
actions that are taken.
F. CLG notification procedures do not apply when a Federal agency nominates a property
under its ownership or control. CLSs are encouraged to coordinate with Federal agencies
to the extent practical, however, in the consideration of such nominations.