15-201
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-201
Length: 954 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 201
Opinion No. 201
Taxation-Delinquent Taxes-Interest
-Constitutional Law.
HELD:
(1) Any tax delinquent
prior to March 2, 1931, must draw in-
terest up to that date at the rate of
12% per annum until March 16, 1003.
and to the extent that Ch. 176, I...aws of
1933, a ttem pts to change the rate
chargeable before that date to that ex-
tent the statute is unconstitutional.
(2) As to all taxes which are levied
and become delinquent after March 2,
1931, such taxes must be figured at the
rate of two-thirds of 1% per month and
Ilpparently the same is true as to all
interest on delinquent taxes which may
Ilccrue after March 16, 1933.
May 9, 1933.
You inquired as to the constitution-
ality .of Chapter 176, Laws of 1933, and
in particular Section 5 thereof. This
law is an amendment of Chapter 100,
Laws of 1929, relating to the procedure
by action in procuring of tax deeds.
Section 5 provides in part as follows:
"Any defendant to said action may
make redemption of said lands from
said tax sale by pay i n g the total
amount of delinquent taxes and penal-
ties with interest thereon at eight per
cent per annum from <late of payment,
which plaintiff shall have paid together
with costs of the action"
Your question must also include the
question as to the rate of interest to be
charged on delinquent taxes. Prior to
l\farch 7, 1923, all taxes which became
delinquent required a penalty of ten
per cent. Chapter 96, Laws of 1923,
amended this penalty changing same to
five per cent and repealed Sections
2175 and 2188, Revised Codes, fixing
the penalty for delinquent taxes. Up
to March 2, 1931, delinquent taxes drew
interest at the rate of twelve per cent
per annum. By Chapter 67, Laws of
1931, the interest was changed so that
delinquent taxes drew interest at the
rate of two-thirds of one per cent per
month. This law specifically provided
tha t its provisions were not retroactive
and applied only to levies from and
after the first Monday of March, 1931.
It is clear that all taxes which become
delinquent after March 2, 1931, draw
interest at the rate of eight per cent
per annum. This is true whether Cha~
ter 176, Laws of 1933, is or is not un-
constitutional.
The difficult question is as to taxes
which become delinquent prior to March
2, 1931. Certainly under the decisions
in Sanderson v. Bateman, 78 Mont. 235,
and State ex reI. Kain v. Fischl, 94
Mont. 92, any attempt to reduce the
rate of delinquent taxes where interest
has already accrued prior to the pass-
age of the act is unconstitutional under
these two decisions. Therefore, any tax
delinquent prior to March 2, 1931, must
draw interest up to that date at the rate
of twelve per cent per annum and to
the extent that Chapter 176, Laws of
1933, attempts to change the rate
chargeable before that date to that ex-
tent the statute is unconstitutional.
Chapter 67, Laws of 1931, specifi-
cally provides: "Section 2. It is speci-
fically prm'ided that the provisions of
this Act are not retroactive and shall
apply only to tax levies made on as-
sessments levied from and after the
first Monday in March, 1931."
"In computing all penalties and de-
linquencies on the sale of property for
the non-payment of taxes, or the acqui-
sition of tax titles, any levies hereto-
fore made shall 'be computed on the
hasis of the then existing laws, but
levies made on assessments for 1931
and thereafter shall be computed on
the basis provided in this Act for their
respective portions, and all Acts and
parts of Acts in conflict herewith are
amended in accordance with the pro-
yisions of this Act."
Therefore Chapter 67 does not change
the rate of interest as to taxes which
become delinquent on a levy prior to
the first Monday of March. 1931. All
of such taxes must carry interest at
twelve per cent per /lnnum until March
16, 1933. On that date Chapter 176,
Laws of 1933, became effective. This
law is primarily a law in relation to
procedure. It does, however, show a
clear intent on the part of the legis-
lature that where the same is not pro-
hibited by the constitution all delin-
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
141
quent taxes shall draw interest at the
rate of eight per cent per annum.
It is to be noted that sections 2210
and 2221, Revised Codes of 1921, which
fix the delinquent tax interest rate at
twelve per cent per annum, have never
been expressly repealed. As to all taxes
which are levied and become delinquent
after March 2, 1931, such taxes must
be figured at the rate of two-thirds of
one per cent per month and apparently
the same is true as to all interest on
delinquent taxes which may accrue
after March 16, 1933. To this extent
the former conflicting acts are repealed
hy implication. The defect in Section
5 of Chapter 176, Laws of 1933, which
is herein mentioned, would not consti-
tute a cause for declaring the whole of
such Chapter unconstitutional as the
remainder of the act would serve its
whole purpose altholJgh the method of
computing interest necessary to redeem
cannot apply in all instances. (Flynn v.
Beaverhead County, 54 Mont. 309.)
The intricacies of this opinion are
caused by the intricacies and incon-
sistencies of the laws which I have at-
tempted to reconcile and so far as pos-
sible carry out the express intent of
the legislature of this state.
Note: Sec. 2221, supra, was repealed
by Chap. 163, Laws of 1935.