15-203
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-203
Length: 450 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 203
Opinion No. 203
Schools-Tl"Ustees-lUeetings, Notire of
amI Business Tt'ansacted-High
Schools-PI"incipal, Election of.
HELD: 1\'0
meetfn~ of a board of
school trustees should be held without
~iying each trustee reasonable notice of
the time and place and the purpose for
which any meeting is called. No bu;;;i-
ne;;;s should be transacted at such meet·
in~ except such as is noticed in the
call for the meeting. (Under the fact;;;,
the re-election of the high school prin-
cipal was the Imsiness of the special
meeting.) .
May 6, 1933.
You have requested my opinion on
the right of a high school hoard of
trustees to re-elect a principal at a
speCial meeting and ha ye gh'en full
details of the action taken by the hoard
at >;uch meeting.
'While there is no specific statute
providin~ for special meetin~s of the
trustees. no meetin,g should be held
without
gh-in~ each of the trustees
reasona ble notice of the time and place
and the purpose for which any meet-
ing is called and no business should he
transacted at such meeting except such
as is noticed in the call for the meet-
ing. Howe,-er, we ,vould say that in
any particular emergency if the trus-
tees should all meet in regular meet-
ing and all agree that a meeting should
be held at that time and spread such
agreement on the minutes, they could
transact any iJusiness that they desired
to take up of an emergency nature and
possibly any bmsiness of any kind, the
transaction of which is not specifically
prohiiJited by law.
Subsection 3 of Section 83 of Chapter
148 of the Laws of ID31, pro,-ides that
a principal may be chosen for not to
exceed two years.
The meeting of
.January 12, 1931, employing a pt;ncipal
for three years was not a legal trans-
action. The meeting of March 14, Ifl33,
employing the principal, for one year
would he a legal meeting if it were
properly called and held, which would
have to he determined by the facts. In
any eyent. it is clearly the purpose of
the hoard to re-employ the principal and
if no action was taken prior to May 1.
1933, the prinCipal will hold over in
the absence of any alh-ice to him that
he ,vas not to be re-employed prior to
that date.
See opinion No. 131 (this Yol.) , rela-
tive to the employment of teachers and
superintendents and principals. which
we think will enable YOU to determine
the legality of the action of your board
in regard to the employment of vour
pl·incipnl. 1Ve do not have nil the fllcts
nccessaJ'~- to determine the le~alits of
the meetings at which such action 'was
taken.