15-214
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-214
Length: 568 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 214
Opinion No. 214
County Commissioners-Poor Tax-
Road Tax-Cancellation-Refund
-County BMrd of Equalization.
HELD: The power of the board of
county commissioners to refund taxes
illegally or erroneously collected, or to
order the cancellation of illegal speCial
poor and road assessments is inde-
pendent of the powers of the board
,,;tting as a county board of equaliza-
tion and may be exercised at any time.
150
OPINIONS OF THE ATTOHXEY GENERAL
May 20, 1933.
You haye submitted the following
questions:
"1. Does the hoard of county com-
missioners have the power and authol'-
ity to order cancellations of special
poor and road assessments for the CUI'-
rent year (1933) that are legally ex-
empt from such assessment at this
time, or can such cancellations only
he made when the commissioners sit
as a board of equalization?
"2. Does the board of county COIll-
missioners have the legal light to re-
fund erroneous collections for 1n33
speCial poor and road tax collections
at this time or must such actions be
made after the completion of the tax
roll ?"
Answering your second question first,
r call your attention to Section 22'22,
reading as follows: "Any taxes, per
centum, and costs paid more than once
or erroneously or illegally collected,
may, by order of rhe board of count~'
commissioners, be refunded by the
county treasurer, * * *" The Supreme
Court of California in Hayes v. Los
Angeles County, 33 Pac. 766. in con-
struing a similar statute, held that the
word "may" meant "shall"; in other
words, that it is the duty of the count~
commissioners to order the county treas-
urer to refund taxes illegally collected.
In my opinion such refund should be
made by the county commissioners
whenever demand is made therefor
after the illegal or erroneous collection
of the tax and such power is not de-
pendent upon the powers of the hoard
of equalization. This would be only
equitable and there appears to be no
sound reason for waiting until after
the completion of the tax roll.
Since it is the duty of the county com-
missioners to refund taxes illegally col-
lected, they must necessarily have the
power to order the cancellatiQn of il-
legal special poor and road assessments,
at any time, as there would be no pur-
pose or equity in collecting illegal taxes
and then ordering a refund. This is a
duty of the county commissioners. The
board of equalization is not concerned
with the cancellation of assessments or
refunding of taxes illegally collected.
That board meets "to examine the as-
sessment book and equalize the assess-
ment of property in the county." (See
Section 2113. R C. ~I., 1U21.)
I n the
following section as amended b~' Chap-
ter 187, Laws of 1933, the power of the
board of equalization is stated to be:
". * * to increase or lower any assess-
ment contained in the assessment book.
so as to equalize the assessment of thc
property contained therein, and make
the assessment conform to the true
yalue of such property in money, • • *."
In none of the sections of the code
dealing with the board of equalization
is any power given to that board to
cancel assessments
illegall~' made, or
refund taxes illegally or erroneously
collected. These are duties of the boarel
of county commissioners and are not
dependent upon the powers of the
board of equalization.