15-395
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-395
Length: 723 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 395
Opinion No. 395
Banks amI Banking-Capital Stock,
Reduction of -Stock hoi deI's l\Ieet-
ing, Notice of.
HELD:
Section Ii, Chapter 89,
Laws of 11)2i, requires forty-two days
notice between date of mailing, as well
as first Imblication of notice, and the
l1ate of stockholders' meeting.
Novemher 23, 1!)33
You hU\'e suhmitted ftH· my examina-
tion and approval certificate of pro-
ceedings reducing the capital stock of
the Citizens State Bank of Choteau,
~rontana, from $50,000 to $30,000 and
reducing the number of shares of
stock of said bank. The certificate of
the above proceedings discloses that
the notice of stockholders meeting held
(.n Xoyember 3, 11)33, was published
in the Choteau Acantha on September
28, Octoher 5. Octoher 12, Octo her Hl,
October 22 and XO\'ember 2, 1933 and
that such notice was mailed to the
stockholders on September 2i, 11)33.
Section Ii, Chapter 89, Laws of 192i,
pertaining to the procedure to be fol-
lowed for diminishing the capital :;tock
of i1 bank, provides: ,,*.... It shall
be the duties of the trustees or di-
rectors to publish a notice signed by at
least a majority of them in a newspa-
!ler in the county, if any shall he pull-
lished therein, six
succe~sive weeks,
and to deposit a written or l)\;nted
copy thc\'eof in the postoffice, ad-
dressed to each stDckholder at his us-
ual place of residence at least six
\"eeks p\'e\'ious to the day of the meet-
ing, .... * ."
"A week consists of seven consecu-
th'e days."
(Section 4280, R. C. M.
Hl21.)
Six weeks would necessarily
consist of forty-two days.
Forty-two
(lays pre\'ious to Novemher 3, the date
of the meeting. exclusive of the day
of mailing, would reach back as far as
September 21, which would be the
last day mailing could be made in or-
der to allow for the specified time.
Since the notices were not mailed l1n-
til September 2i, or
onl~' thirty-six
da~'s prior to date of meeting. six week,,;
did not elapse between the date of
lllailing and the date of the meeting.
Since the statute was not complied
with, it is my opinion that the proceed-
ings for the reduction of the capital
litock II re not effecth·e.
The statute also requires publica-
tion of the notice "six succes!:o;ve
weeks".
This undoubtedly means six
weeks 01' forty-two days prior to the
meeting.
This requirement,
in
my
opinion, does not have reference to
the number of insertions in the paper
but to the time notice shall be gh'en,
that is, six weeks or forty-two days.
The statute specifies the number of
weeks-not the number of times the
notice shall he publisbed.
Since only
thirty-five days elapsed he tween the
276
OPIXIOXS 0]<' THE ATTORXEY GEXERAL
date of the first puhlication and the
date of the meeting the requirement of
the statute was not met.
\Ve call attention to the case of
Gan)" v. :Martin. 70 "Mont. 587. 227
Pac. 573, where a" similar question wa;:
discussed b~' our Supreme Court. 'rhe
reasoning of the court in that case, in
my opinion, would be applicable.
The
rule is "ell stated in a Nebraska easp.
State v. Hanson. 80 Neb. 724, 115 X.
W. 2!)4:
"Where the time mentione(l
by the statute expresses the duration
of the notice, the same must be pub-
lished for and during the time men-
tioned. \Yhere, however, the time men-
tioned indicates
onl~' the number of
times the notice is require(l to be pub-
lished, it is satisfied if the notice is
published thc numher of times men-
tioned." (See also Scilley v. Hed Lodge
Hosehud Irriga tion District, 83
~Iont.
282. 272 Pac. 543.)
As stated ill the Garry case the sub-
ject of the publication of notice has
~ivpn the courts much trouhle.
Even
tlwugh there may be some douht as
to whether or not the publication of the
notice was sufficient. there can be no
doubt that the mruiling of the notice
(lid 1I0t meet the requirement of the
statute.
In order that there may not
he an~' question in case the procedure
should be gone m·er. I would suggest
tha tat least forty-two days intenene
between the date of the publication, as
well as the date of the mailing, and
the date of the meeting. and also that
there be seven publications.