15-412
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-412
Length: 493 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 412
Opinion No. 412
Counties--Warrants--Registered War-
l'3nts, Payment of-"Debt Reduction'
Fund"
HELD: Hegistered county warrants
must be paid in the order of their regis-
tration.
The "Debt Heduction l!'und"
provided for in Section 3, Chapter 160,
La ws of 1933, does not relieve the gen-
eral fund of the county from paying,
in -the order of their registration, any
OPI:-iIO:-iS OF THE ATTOH:-iEY GE:-iI,}RAL
287
warrants left outstanding after the ex-
haustion of such "Debt Reduction
1<'lInd."
December 20, 19:3:3.
You submit the following question
for an opinion from this office:
"~Iay
the county treasurer in such districts
after collection of the special tax levy
made in accordance with Chapter 160,
Laws of 1933. in applying such money
"0 collected upon the outstanding war-
rant indebtedness prior to 19:3:3, pay
upon such outstanding warrant indeht-
edness any of the monies collected
from any of the other sources. or must
the county treasurer use such other
monies to pay upon the current ex-
penses of the school year, in which
':a>5e, if this is donc, in some of the
di!;tricts there will be a gap left in the
payment of the outstanding registercd
warrants against the district·:"
Chapter 160, Laws of 1933, Section
3, provides that school warrants issued
and outstanding at the close of the
school year enllin;.: ,June :30, 193:3, llla~'
he paid either by a ·bond issue or hy
special tax leYies running over a peri(}(l
of years, and the proceeds of such spe-
cial levies shall be deposited by the
county treasurer in a speCial fund-
"Debt Reduction 1<'lInd"-and shall be
used for no other purpose, etc.
'Varrants, however, must be paid in
the order of their registration.
(Sec-
tions 4752-4756 H. C. M. 1921.)
In Vol-
ume 14 of Attorney General's Opin-
ions, page 221, Attorney General Foot
rendered an extensh'e opinion on a
question similar to yours relating to a
.;pecial levy for county purposes. With
the reasoning and conclusion of tha t
opinion we agree.
In view of the fact that ,the statutes
require warrants to be paid in the or-
der of their registration we see no
way of filling the gap you refer to ex-
cept to llll.\' outstanding warrants in
the order of their registration out of
the debt Reduction Fund, each year
until that fund is exhausted and then
pay any remaining warrants of those
outstanding at the end of .June 30,
1!l33, out of the general fund of the
district. The statutes do not pro\'ide
for the payment of any warrants of
subsequent registration o\'er those of
prior registration under any circum-
stllnces known to us, nor can we find
any law to support such contention.
True, Chapter 160 pro\'ides a special
method for the payment of outstand-
in;.: warrants hut if such special meth-
od does not supply sufficient funds to
pay all of such warrants the regular
fund is not relie\'ed from paying any
hahlllce outstanding in 'the order of
registration.