15-416
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-416
Length: 401 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 416
Opinion No. 416
Hanks and Banking-Superintendent of
Banks, Powers of-Proxies-Voting
Bank Stock.
HELD:
The
Superintendent
of
Banks has no authority under the 'stat-
ute to vote bank stock by proxy, and
his doing so would be inconsistent with
his duties as Superintendent and in
yiolation of Section 5S, Chapter S9,
Laws of 1927.
January 5, 1934.
You have submitted paragraph 6 of
a contract made in connection with till'
)Iontana Bank and Trust Company of
Great }j'alls, Montana, being in the fol-
lowing language: "6. 'While Mr. Brem-
er's stock in the new bank is to be is-
sued to him, it is to be deposited un-
der a Trust Agreement to be aplll'o\'ed
hy the Superintendent of Banks, with
O1'l:\IO:\S OF '1'I-IE A'l'TOH:\EY GE:\ERAL
28ll
D. A. Crichton, A. t". Stiles and Frank
Hoherts as Trustees for the depositors
of the dosed bank. or their successors
in interest, such stock to be \'oted hy
the Superintendent of Banks of the
State of :\Iontana, or his successors in
office."
You have asked my opinion
on the following question:
"WilI you
kindly adYise me if I have any author-
it~· to vote stock as Superintendent of
Banks, or whether I could 11I1,e the
proxy from the stockholder on record
and Simply appro\'e of the party to
Whom he g-iYes the proxy'!"
Section 58, Chapter S9, Laws of :\Ion-
tana, 1927, provides: "Neither the Su-
perintendent of Banks nor any bank
examiner shall be interested in or a
horrower from any State bank, directl~
or indireotlv."
In view of the abo\'e-
quoted stat'ute it is my opinion that
~'un have no authol'ity tu ,'ute the stock
in q nestion for to do so might in(\i-
rectly, if not directly, interest yon ill
the ba nk.
In order to vote the stock
on any question or issue it would be
nec('ssar.I· for ~'on to give consideration
to and to pass judgment upon such
question or issue.
Your judgment as
Superintendent of Banks might be in-
fluenced ,by such action.
"Thile, of
course, YOl; a re not financially inter-
ested in the bank, yet the duties and
obligations of voting the stock as proxy
would, in my opinion, be inconsistent
with your duty 'as Superintendent of
Banks.
'While there lIIi;.:ht he some douht in
this connection, if there is any doubt
at a II you should, in my opinion, re-
frain from Yoting said stock.