15-54
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-54
Length: 730 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 54
Opinion No. 54
County Commissioners-Per Diem-
Poor Relief.
HELD:
A county commissioner is
not entitle<l to more than hi~ statutory
per diem for services rendered for ali-
ministering the county poor relief fund
even it hough he has been designated b~:
the hoard to do so and the work re-
quires pmcticaJly all of his time or six
days a week.
January 30, 1!l88.
You ha\'e submitted to this office
the question of whether you are en-
titled to pay for administeIing the poor
rel'ief where you have been deSignated
hy the other members of the board to
do so and the work requires practically
all your time. You state that Missoula
County is now a fifth class county.
Under this classification the commis-
sioners are authorized to meet for one
three days' session the first of each
month and other two day sessions when
necessary and proper notice is given,
Your county has estnblished n countv
fuel
yard and
county
commissary
which have rcsulted in matel;al say-
46
OPINIONS OF THE ATTOH:-:EY GEXERAL
ings to the county poor farm.
There
are some 2400 people in the county re-
eeh'ing 'aid from this source.
Super-
lising this work takes full time or six
anys a week. You wish to know wheth-
er you can be paid for the additional
I-illle when the board is not in session.
Section 4521 Hedsed Codes of :M:on-
bUla of 1921 pro\'idcs: "The Board of
Count~' Commissioners are vested with
ell'tin~ and exclusive superintendence of
the poor."
In the case of Jones v. Cooney, 81
1\'Iont. 340, 263 Pac. 429, our Supreme
Court had under consideration the
various statutory enactments relative
to the manner of caring for the poor.
After viewing these statutory provi-
sions and the history of this legisln tion
the court said: "The policy of the
legislature as disclosed br the enact-
ments referred to has been to repose
discretion in the commissioners respect-
ing the care of the sick, poor and in-
firm. Nowhere do we find any positivc
airection respecting that matter." And
again:
"It is plain that supenisory
and regulatory powers in the matter
are reposed in the commissioners. They
are gil'en wide latitude with respect to
rules and regulations authorized by
statute." And further: ;"Vhen the
character of the legislation enacted by
territory and sta'te \lith relation to the
care of the poor is considered and
analyzed as a whole one is led inevi-
tably to the conclusion that it has been
and is the poLicy of the law making
body to repose in the county commis-
sioners a wide discretion in the care
of the indigent, poor, sick and infirm
of their respective counties."
It is a general rule that whenever a
power is conferred upon the board of
c"Ouuty commissioners but the mode in
which the authority is to be exereised
is not indicated the hoard in its dis-
cretion may select any proper mode or
course of procedure.
Fishel' v. Still-
water County, 81 1\'Iont. 31, 261 Pac.
607. Section 4531 provides: "Any per-
son seeking relief must make appliea-
mon to any member of the board, who;
before granting an order for relief,
must require Sll'tisfactory evidence that
he has been a resident of the county
for two months immediately preceding
the day upon which the application is
made."
'Vhile <these general pronSlOns for
the care of the poor as construed by
our cQurt are I'ery broad and are ample
to authorize any method of doing the
work even to the exten t of designating
one member to look after all cases, stlill
that is not sufficient to satisfr you for
your question is whether yon can draw
pay at the per diem rate fixed by law
for each day you are occupied, where
the board is not in seSsion, and it is
admitteu that the amount of work is
sufficient to occupy all your time for
six days each week.
In the cases of State v. SWry, 53,
!\'Iont. 573, and State ex J·el. Paine v.
District Com·t, 53 1\'Iont. 350, our Su-
preme Court announced the rule that
unless the statute anthorizes payment
for sen'ices required to be rendered by
a public 'official none can be lawfull~'
made.
I find no provision of law at;-
thorizing payment for days when the
board is not convened as sudl. You ore
therefore addsed accordingly.