15-586

Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-586

Length: 367 wordsOfficial source

Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 586

Opinion No. 586 Banks and Banking-Location. Moving of-Phwe of Business. l\loving of -Notice to Stockhohlers. HELD: Where all stockholders have consented to the moving of a bank it is not necessary to delay the moving for six weeks while a notice is bein;.; published and mailed to the stock- holders. August 8, 1934. You have today requested that we give you an opinion on the following question: "We would like to ask if we have the right to permit a state bank to mm'e its location within the county without the usual six weeks time for holding a meeting when said move is consented to by the unanimous vote of all stockholders." Section 16, Chapter 89, Laws of 1927. provides for the changing of place of husiness of a bank, and Section 17 re- quires that a notice of such change. signed by a majority of the directors, shall be published for six successive weeks and a written or printed copy of the notice shall be deposited in the post office, addressed to each stock- holder at his usual place of business at least sb:: weeks previous to the date of meeting, at which time a vote of at least two-thirds of all the shares of stock shall be necessar'y in order to change the place of business of a state. bank. The notice required by Section 17 is for the benefit of stockholders. No notice to or consent of depOSitors is required. Since all stockholders have consented to moving the bank, in my opinion it will not be necessary to delay the mov- ing for six weeks, while a notice is being published and mailed as pro- vided by said Section 17. No useful purpose could be served in giving such notice. The law does not require such useless procedure. Each stockholder, in giving his consent, waives his statu- tory right of notice and he would he estopped from making objection. The solvency of the bank is not affected and a depositor cannot complain. He is also at liherty to withdraw his funds in case he wishes to do so. Regardless of these facts, the stat- ute does not require that notice be given to him.