15-586
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-586
Length: 367 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 586
Opinion No. 586
Banks and Banking-Location. Moving
of-Phwe of Business. l\loving of
-Notice to Stockhohlers.
HELD: Where all stockholders have
consented to the moving of a bank it
is not necessary to delay the moving
for six weeks while a notice is bein;.;
published and mailed to the stock-
holders.
August 8, 1934.
You have today requested that we
give you an opinion on the following
question:
"We would like to ask if we have
the right to permit a state bank to
mm'e its location within the county
without the usual six weeks time for
holding a meeting when said move is
consented to by the unanimous vote
of all stockholders."
Section 16, Chapter 89, Laws of 1927.
provides for the changing of place of
husiness of a bank, and Section 17 re-
quires that a notice of such change.
signed by a majority of the directors,
shall be published for six successive
weeks and a written or printed copy of
the notice shall be deposited in the
post office, addressed to each stock-
holder at his usual place of business at
least sb:: weeks previous to the date
of meeting, at which time a vote of
at least two-thirds of all the shares
of stock shall be necessar'y in order to
change the place of business of a state.
bank. The notice required by Section
17 is for the benefit of stockholders.
No notice to or consent of depOSitors
is required.
Since all stockholders have consented
to moving the bank, in my opinion it
will not be necessary to delay the mov-
ing for six weeks, while a notice is
being published and mailed as pro-
vided by said Section 17. No useful
purpose could be served in giving such
notice. The law does not require such
useless procedure.
Each stockholder,
in giving his consent, waives his statu-
tory right of notice and he would he
estopped from making objection. The
solvency of the bank is not affected
and a depositor cannot complain. He is
also at liherty to withdraw his funds
in case he wishes to do so.
Regardless of these facts, the stat-
ute does not require that notice be
given to him.