15-635
Montana Attorney General Opinion 15-635
Length: 361 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 15 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 635
Opinion No. 635
l\lotOI' Vehicles-l\Iotor Number
-Chattel l\Iortgage--Con-
ditional Sales Contract.
HELD: Chapter 159, Laws of 1933,
does not require that the motor number
be included in the description of the
motor vehicle described in a chattel
mortgage or conditional sales contract;
hence the Registrar of Motor Vehicles
may not require it.
Octo her :W, 11)34.
A mortgagee of a motor vehicle,
holding a mortgage on a motor vehicle
described as follows:
"1928 Dodge
Brougham, 1934 license No. 16-1119"
lias submitted to you a certified copy
of the chattel mortgage and asked you
to file the same. No proof has been
submitted that. the license numher de-
scribed was issued for the motor ve-
hicle covered by the mortgage. It is
doubtful if this chattel mortgage would
be notice to subsequent purchasers and
encumbrancers.
You have submitted the following:
"The point, as we see it, is, are
we compelled to accept conditional
sales contracts or chattel mortgages
for filing without the motor number
being supplied? All the reeords in
this office depend entirely upon the
description of the car, and the descrip-
tion of the car is the motor number.
If we file indiscriminately these chat-
tel mortgages or conditional sales con-
tracts and a transfer was applied for,
giving the correct description of the
car, there would be nothing what-
ever in our records to indicate that a
chattel mortgage or a
conditional
sales contract existed."
Since the statute (Chap. 159, Laws
of 1933) does not require that the motor
number be included in the description
of the motor vehicle described in a
chattel mortgage or conditional sales
contract, you may not require it.
If, however, a mortgagee chooses to
take a chattel mortgage or conditional
sales contract on a motor vehicle with-
out adequate description and you are
not able to connect it with the motor
vehicle registered, it would probably
not protect him against subsequent pur-
chasers and encumbrancers. It is my
opinion, however, that you should ac-
OPI~IONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
439
cept it for what it is worth and if it
is not sufficient to protect the mort-
gagee it is his loss, not yours.