16-20
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-20
Length: 430 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 20
Opinion No. 20.
Offices and Officers-Mileage.
HELD: Where a public officer finds
it necessary to use his automobile in
the performance of his official duties,
he may collect mileage for the round
trip of the car when his official busi-
ness does not permit him to return
with the car and where, for the re-
mainder of the journey, he may use
rail transportation.
Hon. John J. Holmes
State Auditor
The Capitol
January 4, 1935.
You have submitted the question
whether the Governor is entitled to
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
19
mileage for the use of his automobile
from Glacier Park to Helena, where
he made a trip by automobile from
Helena to Glacier Park, but did not
himself return with the car from Gla-
cier Park to Helena. His official busi-
ness took him from Glacier Park to
Ft. Peck and to Great Falls, whither
he was able to, and did travel by rail.
By Chapter 16, Laws of 1933,
amending Sections 4884 and 958, Re-
vised Codes, the legislature provided
for compensation at the rate of seven
cents per mile to a public official
whenever it shall be necessary for him
to use his automobile in the perform-
ance of his official duty. This mile-
age undoubtedly was intended to cov-
er merely the actual cost of operation
of the automobile. When a public of-
ficial finds it necessary in the per-
formance of his duty that he travel by
automobile in order to reach a certain
destination, he should be permitted to
collect mileage for the return of the
automobile to his home where the re-
turn of the automobile is actually
necessary and when his official busi-
ness does not permit him to return
with the car himself, for the cost to
him is the same whether he returns
with the automobile or not. If he was
justified in using his car to reach
Glacier Park, then he should be per-
mitted to charge for the round trip.
Apparently it was the intention of
the legislature to compensate an of-
ficial for using his car for the dis-
tance his car necessarily travels
where such means of transportation
is necessary in the performance of
his official duty. The purpose of the
Act is to provide a fair compensation
for the use of the car.
We believe
this is a reasonable construction of
the Act.
Upon the facts presented, I am of
the opinion that a claim for mileage
for use of the car from Glacier Park
to Helena, .is proper and should be al-
lowed.