16-82
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-82
Length: 365 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82
Opinion No. 82.
Public Administrator-Estates-
Fees, Recovery of.
HELD:
Where a public adminis-
trator, in good faith and proceeding
solely in the fulfilling of his duties,
has filed for letters of administration
and paid the fee and where an heir
subsequently appears and successfully
contests granting of letters (1) the
county cannot refund the fee to the
public administrator (2) but it would
seem that the court would
be au-
thorized to require the repayment of
such expenditure by the adminis-
trator.
Mr. William R. Taylor
County Attorney
Anaconda, Montana
April 18, 1935.
Your question is as follows:
"The public administrator applied
for letters of administration in an
estate. He was justified in believ-
ing that the deceased did not have
any relatives in this State.
Subse-
quently to his filing for letters an
heir appeared and successfully con-
tested the granting of letters of ad-
ministration to the public adminis-
trator, and applied for and received
letters of administration in his own
name.
"The
public
administrator
ad-
vanced the fee required for the fil-
ing of letters of administration, and
now would like to have that sum of
money refunded."
Your letter is not exactly clear as
to whether you refer to the right of
the clerk of court to refund the mon-
ey, or the right of the public admin-
istrator to receive same from the es-
tate.
If you are referring to the right of
the county to refund this money, I am
of the opinion that same cannot be
done.
If you are referring to the right of
the court to require repayment of
this fee by the administrator to the
public administrator, there appears to
be no direct authority. It is made
the duty of the public administrator
to take charge of estates under Sec-
tion 9990, R. C. M. 1921, and he may
be required to surrender his admin-
istration to the proper party under
Section 9994, R. C. M. 1921.
Where he has acted in good faith
and proceeded solely in the fulfilling
of his duties, it would seem to me
that the court would be authorized to
require the repayment of his expen-
ditures by the administrator.