16-95
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-95
Length: 210 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 95
Opinion No. 95.
Justice of the Peace-Official Bond-
Premium-Liability for Counties.
HELD: Chapter 45, Laws of 1935,
authorizes the county to pay the pre-
miums on surety bonds of Justices of
the Peace, but it is not retroactive.
Mr. L. D. Glenn
County Attorney
Harlowton, Montana
May 4, 1935.
You have inquired whether under
the provisions of Chapter 45, Laws of
1935, the payment of the premium on
a surety bond for a justice of the
peace is an obligation of the county.
The Attorney General, in an opin-
ion in Volume 10, Report and Official
Opinions of Attorney General, page
266, held that a county is not re-
quired to pay the premium on a surety
bond of a justice of the peace since
the latter is not a county officer but
a township officer, and Section 6236,
R. C. M. 1921, was not broad enough
to include township officers.
While said Chapter 45 broadens
said Section 6236 to include township
officers, it is not expressly retroac-
tive.
Section 3, Revised Codes, pro-
vides that no law is retroactive unless
expressly so declared.
Chapter 45,
therefore, would not authorize pay-
ment of the premium on a surety bond
furnished before the Act went into
effect on February 20, 1935.