16-109
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-109
Length: 455 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 109
Opinion No. 109.
County Coroners-Fees-Investiga-
tion-Inquests.
HELD: If an investigation into a
sudden or violent death is a part of
an inquest the coroner may be al-
lowed his fee, but not otherwise.
Miss Frances Elge
County Attorney
Helena, Montana
May 24, 1935.
Yesterday Dr. Otto G. Klein made
inquiry concerning right of coroner to
receive fees for investigations when
no inquest has been held. Some as-
pects of the question appear not to
have been considered and it seems ad-
visable to issue an opinion covering
these points.
I find that a number of years ago
Wellington D. Rankin, then Attorney
General, issued an opinion to the ef-
fect that the county coroner is not
authorized to charge per diem for
going to the place where he is called
to investigate the cause of death with-
out holding an inquest. (9 Opinions of
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
111
Attorney General 296), This opinion
was agreed to by Attorney General
Foot in 1927. (12 Opinions of Attor-
ney General 141).
These opinions rest upon the rule
that unless there is express statutory
authority for the payment of official
fees such fees cannot be paid, and
since no statute provides for any fee
for a coroner other than upon the days
engaged in holding inquests, no other
fee can be allowed. There is, of course,
a distinction between mileage and
fees.
While this condition may work hard-
ship upon the coroner, I do not see
how the situation can be changed
until the legislature provides for com-
pensation while making investiga-
tions as well as while holding inquests.
I might add that the coroner is not
required to go to the place of death
and investigate every sudden death
which occurs. He is required to go
only when he "* * * is informed that
a person has been killed, or has com-
mitted suicide, or has died under such'
circumstances as to afford a reason-
able ground to suspect that his death
has been occasioned by the act of
another by criminal means, * * *"
and, apparently, such requirement
makes it mandatory that whenever
these conditions appear the coroner
must hold an inquest. (Section 12381,
R. C. M. 1921.) This statute contem-
plates that the coroner shall exercise
a reasonable discretion in determining
whether or not the facts brought to
his attention are sufficient to afford
a reasonable ground for the suspicion
mentioned in the statute. (12 Opinions
of Attorney General 141).
Depending on the facts of the case,
an investigation may, or may not, be
a part of an inquest. If it be a part of
the inquest, then the fee may be al-
lowed. (10 Opinions of Attorney Gen-
eral 199).